Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
- khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
I won't do it for any other picks, but just to keep the sanity on the board Stein tweeted Isaac to the Magic. Didn't have a shot at him.
- Crazysauce
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
I want terrance ferguson
- longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
BloopOracle wrote:instant reaction around the league seems to feel that we fleeced the Bulls
Good to hear, Bloop. I think we clearly won this deal, but only a good pick at 16 will make this a fleece. DraftExpress has my guy Allen with the 7-5 wingspan at 16. Butler and Allen would be a home run, I think.
- BloopOracle
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
TheSP wrote:60WinTim wrote:So who is going to be disappointed if Isaac falls to #7?
I gotta say, at some point you have to go with sure things instead of potential. I am good with Butler.
I'm just confused at this point. Hate losing all that potential with Zach and Dunn, throw in Isaac, OUCH! The window is open now with is great if you ignore the monster in GS.
I am going super Homer but if we end up becoming a really good team really quick towns is going to be an absolute nightmare mismatch against Golden State and Cleveland. Not saying we would beat them but who the fuck is going to stop him?
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
BloopOracle wrote:instant reaction around the league seems to feel that we fleeced the Bulls
Yeah. If you step back and say other than defense, Dunn was pretty disappointing as a rookie. Zach can hit a 3-pointer, but on-off numbers did not favor him. And #7 in a draft is a complete gamble.
We gave up uncertain potential for an all-star. We already have great potential in Wiggins and KAT. Pretty good deal for the Wolves.
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
I remember liking Ike but I didn't feel like scouting another 20 guys. Lol
- longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
crazysauce wrote:I want terrance ferguson
Only 31% on college level threes, crazy...I think we need a better shooter than that. What do you like?
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
Markkanen does make a lot of sense with Chicago.we will see if that's the pick.
- SameOldNudityDrew
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
60WinTim wrote:BloopOracle wrote:instant reaction around the league seems to feel that we fleeced the Bulls
Yeah. If you step back and say other than defense, Dunn was pretty disappointing as a rookie. Zach can hit a 3-pointer, but on-off numbers did not favor him. And #7 in a draft is a complete gamble.
We gave up uncertain potential for an all-star. We already have great potential in Wiggins and KAT. Pretty good deal for the Wolves.
The part of me that only cares about championships is disappointed because it's true, nobody other than GS is coming out of the West in the next few years unless they get unlucky with injuries. We need to build for 3 years from now.
On the other hand, I think this is an objectively good deal for us. Dunn might not end up being more than a one-way player. LaVine is the same, just on the other end. And the 7 pick could end up being meh as well. In exchange we get a legit two-way All-Star and a pick that is not really THAT much worse than what we gave up. Good deal.
Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver
longstrangetrip wrote:crazysauce wrote:I want terrance ferguson
Only 31% on college level threes, crazy...I think we need a better shooter than that. What do you like?
That was the international 3 he didn't play in college.