Page 9 of 14
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:59 pm
by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Still waiting on hockey, khans, Carlos, cam, phenom.....anyone else?
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:35 am
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Update with latest predictions added:
Bleed - 38
Big O, Pork - 39
Volans - 40
Kekgeek - 41
Abe, Shumway - 42
Q, Monster, D'Natagal - 43
Drew, Mr. Brightside, Mikkeman - 44
Future, Crazysauce, tpoff217, apollotsg - 45
Doper, Kiwi, Maelstrom - 46
Jerry, Mstermisty, Lipoli - 47
TeamRicky, LST - 48
Cool - 49
SP - 50
Worldk - 51
Phenom - 54
Tim - 60
Looks like a sideways bell curve, with 45 wins as the median.
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:39 am
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
BizarroJerry wrote:Still waiting on hockey, khans, Carlos, cam, phenom.....anyone else?
Phenom guessed 54, but yeah, haven't heard from the others.
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:47 am
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Big O wrote:In support of my and the "other white meat's" prediction. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/the-timberwolves-will-be-worse-than-you-think-this-season/?utm_content=buffer089df&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
That's a good article Big O. We're already seeing the effects of having a rookie backup PG (how many seasons in a row do we have a rookie PG either starting or as a backup in the mix? It seems like every damn year we're breaking in someone at that position). Dunn has been incredibly inefficient as a PG - and I mean that in the broadest sense thus far. As the writer said, almost all rookie PGs are net negatives their first season.
He went on to make other good points. While most of us as fans would be super disappointed to see this team win only 37 or 38 games, that's really not a horrible year nor should it be totally unexpected.
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:56 am
by bleedspeed
Bottom line. I just don't trust this team. It seems like the Vikings, Wild, and Twins can get lucky, but this team takes hope and crushes it. I think we have a solid core, but I don't see anything coming easily for this franchise and we will take a few years for it all to come together. When it does come together it will be forged in steal and be force for years to come. Not a one hit wonder boy band.
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:59 am
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
bleedspeed177 wrote:Bottom line. I just don't trust this team. It seems like the Vikings, Wild, and Twins can get lucky, but this team takes hope and crushes it. I think we have a solid core, but I don't see anything coming easily for this franchise and we will take a few years for it all to come together. When it does come together it will be forged in steal and be force for years to come. Not a one hit wonder boy band.
That's dramatic stuff there Bleed. I like it!
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:52 pm
by bleedspeed
Man my grammar sucks . "STEEL" and "BE A FORCE"
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:31 pm
by Papalrep
Q- That's a good article Big O. We're already seeing the effects of having a rookie backup PG (how many seasons in a row do we have a rookie PG either starting or as a backup in the mix? It seems like every damn year we're breaking in someone at that position). Dunn has been incredibly inefficient as a PG - and I mean that in the broadest sense thus far. As the writer said, almost all rookie PGs are net negatives their first season.
Is it to early for "Dunn is a huge disappointment"? or how about "shoulda drafted Hield"?
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:18 pm
by Monster
papalrep wrote:Q- That's a good article Big O. We're already seeing the effects of having a rookie backup PG (how many seasons in a row do we have a rookie PG either starting or as a backup in the mix? It seems like every damn year we're breaking in someone at that position). Dunn has been incredibly inefficient as a PG - and I mean that in the broadest sense thus far. As the writer said, almost all rookie PGs are net negatives their first season.
Is it to early for "Dunn is a huge disappointment"? or how about "shoulda drafted Hield"?
If you watched Buddy's last game where he didn't score then what? :)
Re: ***Official 2016-2017 Wins Prediction Thread***
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:52 pm
by bleedspeed
It really all depends on if he becomes a bust or not. It is nice to do it early. I was hoping he was drafted before we picked, but was not to sad when Bender didn't drop to us. I have not been paying to close of attention.