Re: Bucks@Wolves GDT
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:21 pm
Wiggs zero assists is because too many bricklayers tonight. Wiggs passing has looked good despite the lack of assists.
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=26810
thedoper wrote:Camden0916 wrote:Wiggins has actually been pretty good tonight. Scoring the ball efficiently. This is less of a criticism -- rather, it's just odd to see. How does Wiggins manage to have the ball in his hands as much as he does, but still have zero assists through almost 30 minutes? It's just really odd. And it's not a singular event. Anyone have any ideas?
I think whats even more puzzling with the lack of assists and how people discuss his handle here that he still has a career positive assist to turnover ratio. He has the ball a lot but despite all the bad shots and ugly dribbling he still makes the right basketball plays, even with his passing. Which is why coaches probably keep playing him.
Q12543 wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Q12543 wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:Napier hurt. Hurt his hamstring. Dane Moore said he heard him say he popped it. We are not deep at PG and Napier is the only guy on the bench that can create offense for himself
Let the Jordan McLaughlin era begin!
Before the season, i thought it woukd be culver. After watching culver, i think well see point wiggs again.
Ugh....
Let's try Point Okogie, just for the sheer chaos that would ensue.
some people are expecting something more than what Wiggins is being asked to do. Sure, the assists could be better . . . . but tonight he drew 3 defenders on multiple occasions and kicked to the wide open 2 for . . . clank. His rebounds could have been higher but on multiple occasions he tipped to someone else or kept the ball alive. We are trying to play team basketball, stat stuffing is bullshit (Love/Towns et al. . . ) and Wiggins is doing what the coaches want him to do. Play within the flow, draw and kick . .. etc ...Jim Pete with the ultimate prisoner of the moment commentary. Wiggins makes a three and an aesthetically-pleasing layup to end the half and Jim says, "He's having a great season. You have to admit it." He's had his moments, but by all accounts he still has a long way to go for it to be a solid season let alone a great one.
Good fight from the Wolves tonight through the first half. Hope they don't come up flat in the third quarter.
You don't think he's had a solid start to the season?
It depends on what context. He's had a solid start if you compare him to the last two years of himself, but he's been meh overall from a league-wide perspective. There have been the usual flashes of great play -- namely, the end of the Brooklyn and Miami games -- but the whole picture looks less impressive when you dig into the matter.
You confuse me a little bit. You've already established he's a lower echelon player in the league. For somebody who is one of the poorer players in the league, 20.4/5.6/2.0 plus his late game heroics would seem to be solid. At least most reasonable observers would say that.
PorkChop wrote:As much flack as Teague gets on this board does anyone wanna acknowledge the win/loss record based on his play compared to everyone else?