Page 1 of 7
Match madness thread
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:47 am
by kekgeek
Just thought we should have one
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:48 am
by kekgeek
David Roddy from Colorado St. Is going to be a borderline 1st round pick. He is from MN
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:33 pm
by Leado01
The quality of basketball at the college level is so much better than it was 15-20-30 years ago. The strength and conditioning and skills are off the charts. I would struggle as an NBA scout to choose.
How many All Americans will go undrafted or late in the 2nd round this year?
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:31 pm
by Porckchop
Holmgren has 19pts 17rebs 4asst 7 blocks. Seems almost effortless.
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:11 pm
by Q-is-here
St. Peter's may be one of the better coached teams I've seen. They really have their shit together in terms of team defense and executing their offense.
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:42 pm
by kekgeek
Chet is such a defensive force
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 1:27 pm
by Q-is-here
Not impressed with Cockburn for those of you who think his size may be a difference maker for the Wolves and we should target him in the draft. Seems very heavy-footed. Big and strong for sure, but that advantage shrinks considerably at the next level. His decision making is very slow along with his foot speed. He also plays on a pretty low burn intensity wise.
I'd definitely rank Oscar Tshiebwe higher than Cockburn, although I don't think he's a guaranteed difference maker either.
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:02 pm
by kekgeek
Q-was-here wrote:Not impressed with Cockburn for those of you who think his size may be a difference maker for the Wolves and we should target him in the draft. Seems very heavy-footed. Big and strong for sure, but that advantage shrinks considerably at the next level. His decision making is very slow along with his foot speed. He also plays on a pretty low burn intensity wise.
I'd definitely rank Oscar Tshiebwe higher than Cockburn, although I don't think he's a guaranteed difference maker either.
Ya no thank you on Cockburn for me. He can't shoot, is not a good roller and a good but not elite rebounder. Would rather have a guy who can be a constant roller on offense
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:04 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Q-was-here wrote:Not impressed with Cockburn for those of you who think his size may be a difference maker for the Wolves and we should target him in the draft. Seems very heavy-footed. Big and strong for sure, but that advantage shrinks considerably at the next level. His decision making is very slow along with his foot speed. He also plays on a pretty low burn intensity wise.
I'd definitely rank Oscar Tshiebwe higher than Cockburn, although I don't think he's a guaranteed difference maker either.
I don't see either of them being a good fit for the Wolves. Not sure either of them will stick in the NBA, to be honest.
Re: Match madness thread
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:28 pm
by Monster
Camden wrote:Q-was-here wrote:Not impressed with Cockburn for those of you who think his size may be a difference maker for the Wolves and we should target him in the draft. Seems very heavy-footed. Big and strong for sure, but that advantage shrinks considerably at the next level. His decision making is very slow along with his foot speed. He also plays on a pretty low burn intensity wise.
I'd definitely rank Oscar Tshiebwe higher than Cockburn, although I don't think he's a guaranteed difference maker either.
I don't see either of them being a good fit for the Wolves. Not sure either of them will stick in the NBA, to be honest.
I watched a chunk of that game against Houston and I had the same thoughts Q. I might be interested him with a 2nd rounder or I suppose a 2-way deal but what ai saw today didn't really make me want to target him at all. He didn't look very explosive vertically.