Page 1 of 2
Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 3:55 pm
by Lipoli390
Kevin Durant (Age 21) (2009/10) TS% = .607; PPG = 30.1
Shaquille O'Neal (Age 21) (1993-94) TS% = .605; PPG = 29.3
Andrian Dantley (Age 20) (1976-77) TS% = .601; PPG = 20.3
Zach LaVine (Age 21) (2016-17) TS% = .601; PPG = 21.1
Just thought this was in interesting comparison someone sent me.
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:13 pm
by BloopOracle
huh?
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:20 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Try again, Lip!
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:33 pm
by Wile E Coyote [enjin:17432808]
404 Not Found
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:36 pm
by Lipoli390
Kevin Durant (Age 21) (2009/10) TS% = .607; PPG = 30.1
Shaquille O'Neal (Age 21) (1993-94) TS% = .605; PPG = 29.3
Andrian Dantley (Age 20) (1976-77) TS% = .601; PPG = 20.3
Zach LaVine (Age 21) (2016-17) TS% = .601; PPG = 21.1
Just thought this was in interesting comparison someone sent me.
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:36 pm
by AbeVigodaLive
Holy shitballs.
That's a great photo!
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:40 pm
by Lipoli390
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Holy shitballs.
That's a great photo!
lol
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:47 pm
by Wile E Coyote [enjin:17432808]
Zach's value is definitely rising, for us and other teams. I would guess that ORL would trade the farm for a guy like Zach. They can't score and don't have anyone with a very high ceiling.
Hold onto Zach Wolves mgmt.
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:15 pm
by Lipoli390
I'm thinking that Zach is our 5-year guy next Fall. If so, that makes Wiggins a 4-year guy because the other 5-year deal has to be reserved for KAT the following Fall. So I would hope our front office can get a sense of whether Andrew would be cool with the 4-year deal. If not, then we'll need to seriously consider trading him either by this season's trade deadline or next summer.
Re: Zach LaVine
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:20 pm
by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
lipoli390 wrote:I'm thinking that Zach is our 5-year guy next Fall. If so, that makes Wiggins a 4-year guy because the other 5-year deal has to be reserved for KAT the following Fall. So I would hope our front office can get a sense of whether Andrew would be cool with the 4-year deal. If not, then we'll need to seriously consider trading him either by this season's trade deadline or next summer.
What? You slap the RFA tag on him and match any offer he gets. Why in the world would we trade him like we have to when we don't?