Page 1 of 1
Sorry, I guess we still suck
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:53 pm
by Papalrep
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/story/espn-measure-says-wolves-only-have-15th-best-young-core-in-nba-072215
Re: Sorry, I guess we still suck
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 7:55 am
by AbeVigodaLive
I know we've discussed this before... but after reading the opening of that guy's column... I hate the list (article) even more. Most of the opening is prefacing how irrelevant it all is.
Stats are nice. But, stats + context is a helluva lot better. C'mon ESPN.
[Note: Again, it's not sour grapes over the Wolves listing. My beef is with the parameters of the list. It's fraught with flaws, rendering it effectively worthless... which SHOULD have never made it to the ESPN website.]
Re: Sorry, I guess we still suck
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:59 am
by Monster
AbeVigodaLive wrote:I know we've discussed this before... but after reading the opening of that guy's column... I hate the list (article) even more. Most of the opening is prefacing how irrelevant it all is.
Stats are nice. But, stats + context is a helluva lot better. C'mon ESPN.
[Note: Again, it's not sour grapes over the Wolves listing. My beef is with the parameters of the list. It's fraught with flaws, rendering it effectively worthless... which SHOULD have never made it to the ESPN website.]
Where is the list of teams with old cores? (Players 35 and above) The Wolves have to at least be average t now with adding Miller right? Lol
Re: Sorry, I guess we still suck
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:17 am
by AbeVigodaLive
monsterpile wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:I know we've discussed this before... but after reading the opening of that guy's column... I hate the list (article) even more. Most of the opening is prefacing how irrelevant it all is.
Stats are nice. But, stats + context is a helluva lot better. C'mon ESPN.
[Note: Again, it's not sour grapes over the Wolves listing. My beef is with the parameters of the list. It's fraught with flaws, rendering it effectively worthless... which SHOULD have never made it to the ESPN website.]
Where is the list of teams with old cores? (Players 35 and above) The Wolves have to at least be average t now with adding Miller right? Lol
Minnesota is ranked #1 for pick-and-roll tandems over 38 years old.