Minnesota Sports Forum

Apparently the Kings are interested in Otto Porter, I'm guessing they won't need to give up many assets to take on his contract. If your the Wolves why wouldn't you try and see if they're interested in Wiggins. I'm convinced Ogokie will be better then Wig very soon.

The other team I'd hit up would be Orlando, they seem desparate to make the playoffs and would make a move for a wing, something the very much need.

Remember when people were wondering why the Spurs didn't resign Jonathon Simmons after he came out of nowhere to be a serviceable player?

He's currently shooting 33.6%.

The rub is that Orlando needs a PG more than anything... and... they might believe Evan Fournier and Terrence Ross are better than Wiggins for less money.

Nobody is gonna trade for a max contract guy who scored 0 points in a game. That simple

I agree with you, but if someone is willing to take on Porter's contact, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibly to get someone to bite on Wig

Duke13 wrote:I agree with you, but if someone is willing to take on Porter's contact, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibly to get someone to bite on Wig

I agree with you that Wiggins value is low but if we are going to trade him I believe his value could raise in the offseason when multiple teams miss out on top free agents and they panic.

kekgeek1 wrote:

Duke13 wrote:I agree with you, but if someone is willing to take on Porter's contact, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibly to get someone to bite on Wig

I agree with you that Wiggins value is low but if we are going to trade him I believe his value could raise in the offseason when multiple teams miss out on top free agents and they panic.

I doubt it. Nobody is gonna 'panic sign' Wiggins. We're stuck with him eating up max money for an average player. Yay!

What about Beal for Wiggins? Maybe the wizards think they can bring the best out of wiggins? Any way wizards do that deal? Heard we and spurs were talking to them.

crazysauce wrote:What about Beal for Wiggins? Maybe the wizards think they can bring the best out of wiggins? Any way wizards do that deal? Heard we and spurs were talking to them.

They didn't do butler for Beal no way they do it for Wiggins

If you are trading Wiggins it's basically to dump him. There is no sense the Wolves are looking to do that. I'm not there yet either. I saw part of an article about John Wall's trade value...basically according to what they found from talking to NBA folks his contract is un-moveable. Someone will take Wiggins at some point if it comes to that. I think this offseason makes more sense as it's been suggested already.

https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/bradley_beal_vs_andrew_wiggins.htm


Numbers wouldnt suggest the trade is really that farfetched.