Page 1 of 1
Should we have?
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:09 pm
by Papalrep
All this doom and gloom about Love leaving. So should we have traded him for Waiters and a lotto pick/ Taken Trey Burke instead of trading down? What's another rebuild, after all, we're the TWolves
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:11 am
by BloopOracle
no, if we trade him ( and I don't think we should) it should be for a top 3 pick this draft
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:57 am
by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
I think Father Sarducci was referring to the deal proposed 5 months ago by CLE that had Love going to CLE for the #1 pick in the draft/Waters/salaries.
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:06 am
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
So we would have traded Love for Oladipo, Waiters, and Thompson. Then drafted Olynyk at 9 more than likely since Flip really liked him.
Ehh. I think we can get better if we need to trade him.
EDIT: I said Oladipo because Flip loved him (so do I) and he honestly should have gone No. 1 overall.
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:29 am
by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
A 3-way with Varejao going to OKC and #12/Perkins going to MIN might have made the deal slightly better.
Would Waiters and Thompson been enough salary under league rules?
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:41 am
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
JasonIsDaMan wrote:A 3-way with Varejao going to OKC and #12/Perkins going to MIN might have made the deal slightly better.
Would Waiters and Thompson been enough salary under league rules?
Perkins is trash and is set to make $9.6M next year. I'd rather him not be included at all even if it means we didn't get that 12th pick.
Re: Should we have?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:12 am
by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
I'm having a tough time trying to think of an argument. The only thing I can think of is Waiters and Thompson might not being enough salary under league rules and eventually "Kendrick Perkins" will become "Kendrick Perkins Expiring Contract".