How many players would you take over our guy by position?
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:56 pm
Thought about this watching Jeff Teague during the Atlanta game. How many PGs would you gladly take in exchange for Ricky, straight-up?
Just glancing over the rosters, I see 2-3 superior point guards almost *per division*.
Rajon Rondo
Deron Williams
Kyle Lowry
Stephen Curry
Chris Paul
Goran Dragic
Tony Parker
Mike Conley
John Wall
Ty Lawson
Damian Lillard
Kyrie Irving
That's 12 slam dunks for me, but I'd also consider swapping for one of the following as well:
Jeff Teague
Kemba Walker
Jrue Holiday
Reggie Jackson
Add it all up and Rubio might not even be a top 15 point guard in this league.
At the center position? Much shorter list:
Roy Hibbert
Dwight Howard
Tim Duncan
Tyson Chandler
Joakim Noah
Marc Gasol
Almost all rim protectors, though. Almost like that's the primary purpose of the position in today's NBA...
SG/SF is kind of a catch-all "wing player" category. The number of guys you'd take ahead of Martin is fairly long. The number you'd take ahead of Brewer is even longer.
Sixth Man: if our primary 6th man is JJ, there must be 20-30 bench guys you'd take over him, right?
PF is, IMO, the only position of legitimate strength on this team. Center is debate-able; Pek gives you scoring (which could be easily redistributed to other positions) and rebounding (sorta standard issue at the position) but no rim protection (which can't be "made up" at other positions very easily). PG is arguably a straight weakness given the importance and strength of the position in today's NBA. Our wings and bench have to be among the very worst in the league.
This is a talent-poor team with limited assets for improvement going forward. That's what happens when you draft poorly pretty much forever. Love won't stick around for another quasi-rebuild. The more we get for him, and the sooner we get it, the better. Much as it might suck to suffer through another rebuild, we need to do it right. Trade everything of value on the current roster for picks, tank hard for 2-3 seasons, and pray we knock 3-4 consecutive drafts out of the park. That is literally the only way to build a contender in a small market.
Just glancing over the rosters, I see 2-3 superior point guards almost *per division*.
Rajon Rondo
Deron Williams
Kyle Lowry
Stephen Curry
Chris Paul
Goran Dragic
Tony Parker
Mike Conley
John Wall
Ty Lawson
Damian Lillard
Kyrie Irving
That's 12 slam dunks for me, but I'd also consider swapping for one of the following as well:
Jeff Teague
Kemba Walker
Jrue Holiday
Reggie Jackson
Add it all up and Rubio might not even be a top 15 point guard in this league.
At the center position? Much shorter list:
Roy Hibbert
Dwight Howard
Tim Duncan
Tyson Chandler
Joakim Noah
Marc Gasol
Almost all rim protectors, though. Almost like that's the primary purpose of the position in today's NBA...
SG/SF is kind of a catch-all "wing player" category. The number of guys you'd take ahead of Martin is fairly long. The number you'd take ahead of Brewer is even longer.
Sixth Man: if our primary 6th man is JJ, there must be 20-30 bench guys you'd take over him, right?
PF is, IMO, the only position of legitimate strength on this team. Center is debate-able; Pek gives you scoring (which could be easily redistributed to other positions) and rebounding (sorta standard issue at the position) but no rim protection (which can't be "made up" at other positions very easily). PG is arguably a straight weakness given the importance and strength of the position in today's NBA. Our wings and bench have to be among the very worst in the league.
This is a talent-poor team with limited assets for improvement going forward. That's what happens when you draft poorly pretty much forever. Love won't stick around for another quasi-rebuild. The more we get for him, and the sooner we get it, the better. Much as it might suck to suffer through another rebuild, we need to do it right. Trade everything of value on the current roster for picks, tank hard for 2-3 seasons, and pray we knock 3-4 consecutive drafts out of the park. That is literally the only way to build a contender in a small market.