Flopping, SGA and Ant
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2025 4:06 pm
I just finished listening to the Locked on Wolves podcast, and while Ben Beecken was quite complimentary of SGA, he also was outraged at the amount of flopping he did during last night's game. He also commented on the disparity of free throw attempts between the respective high scorers, and blamed a lot of it on SGA's acting. It got me thinking...why is there so much disdain for players who try to influence the referees with some acting? Further, wouldn't some of our players be more productive if they copied what SGA does?
In every other sport I can think of, pretending something has happened that hasn't is a regular (and often admired) part of the game. If a pitcher delivers a pitch out of the strike zone, the catchers who are most admired for "framing" quickly move their glove into the strike zone to try to convince the umpire the pitch was actually a strike. Would we rather the catcher not do this because it is dishonest? Heck, some catchers with batting averages in the low 200s have carved out long careers because of their ability to "frame"...i.e. cheat. Speaking from a personal perspective, I have been an outfielder for decades. If I trap a line drive in front of me but it's a close call, the first thing I do is raise my glove in the air signaling to the ump that I actually caught it. Same with wide receivers in football...when they have clearly caught a ball off the ground and they know it, they give the "catch" signal to the refs to try to convince them it didn't hit the ground. Cheaters?
So why do we treat NBA floppers differently than baseball and football players, when they are really only doing the same thing...trying to convince the referees that they have been fouled. Ant repeatedly complains to the refs when he thinks he has been fouled, and it doesn't seem to do him much good...in fact, I would argue that it actually makes it less likely that a ref will award him a foul later, because refs don't like to be shown up. It seems to me that Ant could learn a lot from SGA about flopping. SGA and Ant are both remarkably talented and athletic basketball players who love to attack the rim, but SGA averages 7.9 free throw attempts per game this season, and Ant only 3.8. What do we attribute that to? Hometown fans well often attribute it to referee bias, especially with big market players, but SGA plays in one of the smallest markets in the Association. I think the disparity is mostly because SGA is better at convincing refs that he has been fouled...yes, flopping. You know, like framing.
Ant is as athletic as SGA and a better long-range shooter. I think if he changed his focus to convincing the referees that he has been fouled rather than complaining that a foul hasn't been called, a 25 PPG scorer could instantly become closer to a 30 PPG scorer...he's that good. And here's my pledge: if Ant learns to flop like SGA and starts shooting 8-10 free throws per game, I promise not to be outraged by him!
Thoughts?
In every other sport I can think of, pretending something has happened that hasn't is a regular (and often admired) part of the game. If a pitcher delivers a pitch out of the strike zone, the catchers who are most admired for "framing" quickly move their glove into the strike zone to try to convince the umpire the pitch was actually a strike. Would we rather the catcher not do this because it is dishonest? Heck, some catchers with batting averages in the low 200s have carved out long careers because of their ability to "frame"...i.e. cheat. Speaking from a personal perspective, I have been an outfielder for decades. If I trap a line drive in front of me but it's a close call, the first thing I do is raise my glove in the air signaling to the ump that I actually caught it. Same with wide receivers in football...when they have clearly caught a ball off the ground and they know it, they give the "catch" signal to the refs to try to convince them it didn't hit the ground. Cheaters?
So why do we treat NBA floppers differently than baseball and football players, when they are really only doing the same thing...trying to convince the referees that they have been fouled. Ant repeatedly complains to the refs when he thinks he has been fouled, and it doesn't seem to do him much good...in fact, I would argue that it actually makes it less likely that a ref will award him a foul later, because refs don't like to be shown up. It seems to me that Ant could learn a lot from SGA about flopping. SGA and Ant are both remarkably talented and athletic basketball players who love to attack the rim, but SGA averages 7.9 free throw attempts per game this season, and Ant only 3.8. What do we attribute that to? Hometown fans well often attribute it to referee bias, especially with big market players, but SGA plays in one of the smallest markets in the Association. I think the disparity is mostly because SGA is better at convincing refs that he has been fouled...yes, flopping. You know, like framing.
Ant is as athletic as SGA and a better long-range shooter. I think if he changed his focus to convincing the referees that he has been fouled rather than complaining that a foul hasn't been called, a 25 PPG scorer could instantly become closer to a 30 PPG scorer...he's that good. And here's my pledge: if Ant learns to flop like SGA and starts shooting 8-10 free throws per game, I promise not to be outraged by him!
Thoughts?