Kekgeek grades G40 vs warriors
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:25 pm
Donte: A
Ant: C
Jaden: A-
Randle: D+
Rudy: B-
Naz: B+
Conley: C
Naw: C
Ant: C
Jaden: A-
Randle: D+
Rudy: B-
Naz: B+
Conley: C
Naw: C
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=31766
Sounds like you finally got beaten down enough Tim to join the rest of us on the pessimism train! Sorry we'll miss your positivity (for the time being at least).60WinTim wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:49 pm It sucks we are basically .500 team. Expectations were so much higher, even with an expectation of a "slight" step back from the KAT trade.
Finch has to be in a tough spot -- swapping Naz and Randle is a logical move, but not a good idea if the goal is to move Randle by the trade deadline.
No, we can't lose Tim! Anyway, I get it...that was not a good loss.Q-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:17 pmSounds like you finally got beaten down enough Tim to join the rest of us on the pessimism train! Sorry we'll miss your positivity (for the time being at least).60WinTim wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:49 pm It sucks we are basically .500 team. Expectations were so much higher, even with an expectation of a "slight" step back from the KAT trade.
Finch has to be in a tough spot -- swapping Naz and Randle is a logical move, but not a good idea if the goal is to move Randle by the trade deadline.
I don't want to blame this whole thing on the ownership mess, but the timing of it couldn't be worse. And how freakin' long does it take to rule on this thing!? I really hope the uncertainty doesn't prevent Connelly from making any moves as we near the trade deadline. I would think getting out from under Randle's contract would be pretty uncontroversial and "ownernship agnostic" if what we get in return is off the books after this year.
Interesting....I wonder if they just come to a settlement of some sort where Glen gives up majority ownership, but gets a bigger nut than what was originally agreed to.FNG wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:17 pmNo, we can't lose Tim! Anyway, I get it...that was not a good loss.Q-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:17 pmSounds like you finally got beaten down enough Tim to join the rest of us on the pessimism train! Sorry we'll miss your positivity (for the time being at least).60WinTim wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:49 pm It sucks we are basically .500 team. Expectations were so much higher, even with an expectation of a "slight" step back from the KAT trade.
Finch has to be in a tough spot -- swapping Naz and Randle is a logical move, but not a good idea if the goal is to move Randle by the trade deadline.
I don't want to blame this whole thing on the ownership mess, but the timing of it couldn't be worse. And how freakin' long does it take to rule on this thing!? I really hope the uncertainty doesn't prevent Connelly from making any moves as we near the trade deadline. I would think getting out from under Randle's contract would be pretty uncontroversial and "ownernship agnostic" if what we get in return is off the books after this year.
As for the ownership thing, who knows how much of a distraction it has been. You may have noticed that Glen and Becky have not been at any games for the past month or so, and I have heard that Glen is quite sick. Not sure what implications that has for resolution of the ownership issue, but it could impact how fast it gets resolved.
Glen broke his hip. That’s why he has not been at games. We do not want Glen to dieQ-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:25 pmInteresting....I wonder if they just come to a settlement of some sort where Glen gives up majority ownership, but gets a bigger nut than what was originally agreed to.FNG wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:17 pmNo, we can't lose Tim! Anyway, I get it...that was not a good loss.Q-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:17 pm
Sounds like you finally got beaten down enough Tim to join the rest of us on the pessimism train! Sorry we'll miss your positivity (for the time being at least).
I don't want to blame this whole thing on the ownership mess, but the timing of it couldn't be worse. And how freakin' long does it take to rule on this thing!? I really hope the uncertainty doesn't prevent Connelly from making any moves as we near the trade deadline. I would think getting out from under Randle's contract would be pretty uncontroversial and "ownernship agnostic" if what we get in return is off the books after this year.
As for the ownership thing, who knows how much of a distraction it has been. You may have noticed that Glen and Becky have not been at any games for the past month or so, and I have heard that Glen is quite sick. Not sure what implications that has for resolution of the ownership issue, but it could impact how fast it gets resolved.
That sounds like more specific information than I had, kek. A friend of his told me two weeks ago that Glen was doing very poorly, but didn't give me any details. I assumed he meant sick, but more likely it's the hip.kekgeek wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:52 pmGlen broke his hip. That’s why he has not been at games. We do not want Glen to dieQ-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:25 pmInteresting....I wonder if they just come to a settlement of some sort where Glen gives up majority ownership, but gets a bigger nut than what was originally agreed to.FNG wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:17 pm
No, we can't lose Tim! Anyway, I get it...that was not a good loss.
As for the ownership thing, who knows how much of a distraction it has been. You may have noticed that Glen and Becky have not been at any games for the past month or so, and I have heard that Glen is quite sick. Not sure what implications that has for resolution of the ownership issue, but it could impact how fast it gets resolved.
He could be sick and your buddy is right but about a month ago the Timberwolves announced he broke his hip and would not be attending gamesFNG wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:55 pmThat sounds like more specific information than I had, kek. A friend of his told me two weeks ago that Glen was doing very poorly, but didn't give me any details. I assumed he meant sick, but more likely it's the hip.