I'm Not Kekgeek's Grades G7
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 8:57 pm
Randle - A+
Rudy - A
DDV - A
Jaden - A
Conley - A-
Naz - A-
Dilly - C
Clark - B
Shannon - B
Rudy - A
DDV - A
Jaden - A
Conley - A-
Naz - A-
Dilly - C
Clark - B
Shannon - B
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=32044
I agree with you on TSJ and Clark as well as Bones. But I’m going to stick with Q’s grades on Julius and Naz. An A for Conley doesn’t make sense to me. I’d give him a B. Here are my slightly less generous grades:FNG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:15 pm Wow, if you had been one of my profs in college, maybe I would have done better than a 2.3 GPA!
That said, after a slow start, it was a good team win...so most of the high grades are deserved. I would downgrade both Clark and TSJ to C's though...Clark's 0-4 at the line alone downgrades him, and I hardly noticed Shannon except for the one dunk. I want to knock Ju and Naz down a little because of that horrible run in the 3rd when they couldn't stop anyone, but I won't. Hyland actually played some real minutes, and I would give him a D.
Really good to win two games on the road without our highest scorer. It gets much more difficult Wednesday night against the Knickerbockers, so we needed these two wins.
Lipoli390 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:23 pmI agree with you on TSJ and Clark as well as Bones. But I’m going to stick with Q’s grades on Julius and Naz. An A for Conley doesn’t make sense to me. I’d give him a B. Here are my slightly less generous grades:FNG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:15 pm Wow, if you had been one of my profs in college, maybe I would have done better than a 2.3 GPA!
That said, after a slow start, it was a good team win...so most of the high grades are deserved. I would downgrade both Clark and TSJ to C's though...Clark's 0-4 at the line alone downgrades him, and I hardly noticed Shannon except for the one dunk. I want to knock Ju and Naz down a little because of that horrible run in the 3rd when they couldn't stop anyone, but I won't. Hyland actually played some real minutes, and I would give him a D.
Really good to win two games on the road without our highest scorer. It gets much more difficult Wednesday night against the Knickerbockers, so we needed these two wins.
Randle - A+
Rudy - A
DDV - A
Jaden - A
Conley - B
Naz - A-
Dilly - C
Clark - C
Shannon - C
Bones D
I try to grade folks vs. what we expect from them in their role and the fact is Conley starred in his role tonight. And keep in mind those 9 points and 7 assists came in only 24 minutes.FNG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:40 pmLipoli390 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:23 pmI agree with you on TSJ and Clark as well as Bones. But I’m going to stick with Q’s grades on Julius and Naz. An A for Conley doesn’t make sense to me. I’d give him a B. Here are my slightly less generous grades:FNG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:15 pm Wow, if you had been one of my profs in college, maybe I would have done better than a 2.3 GPA!
That said, after a slow start, it was a good team win...so most of the high grades are deserved. I would downgrade both Clark and TSJ to C's though...Clark's 0-4 at the line alone downgrades him, and I hardly noticed Shannon except for the one dunk. I want to knock Ju and Naz down a little because of that horrible run in the 3rd when they couldn't stop anyone, but I won't. Hyland actually played some real minutes, and I would give him a D.
Really good to win two games on the road without our highest scorer. It gets much more difficult Wednesday night against the Knickerbockers, so we needed these two wins.
Randle - A+
Rudy - A
DDV - A
Jaden - A
Conley - B
Naz - A-
Dilly - C
Clark - C
Shannon - C
Bones D
Yeah, I understand Q's A grade for Conley...7 assists and only 2 TOs, and 9 points on 5 shots ain't bad. Plus he was very active and disruptive in the passing lanes on D. But I'd probably give him a B also.