Minnesota Sports Forum

Donte: C+
Ant: A-
Jaden: A-
Randle: B
Rudy: A
Naz: C
Conley: C
Clark: C-
Dilly: C

I didn't love Julius's game today aesthetically, but he really stuffed the stat sheet and ended up with a team-best +22. He also cashed in on 12-13 FTAs, which helped us fend off a number of Utah runs. I'd give him at least an A-.

I'd downgrade Conley to a C-.

Agree that Clark and Dillingham were very mediocre.

I love your grading, kek! I usually don't have much to nitpick. Randle might have started slow, but he was really good in this game. He was a team best +22 and it has been such a luxury to have a guy that can bully his way in for an easy bucket, and yet can also generate great shots for teammates. He deserves another "A" in my book.

60WinTim wrote: ↑Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:50 pm I love your grading, kek! I usually don't have much to nitpick. Randle might have started slow, but he was really good in this game. He was a team best +22 and it has been such a luxury to have a guy that can bully his way in for an easy bucket, and yet can also generate great shots for teammates. He deserves another "A" in my book.

Yeah, I generally agree with Kek's grading also, but I agree with you guys that Ju needs an upgrade.

It's amazing how much better we play when Rudy gets more shots. I think we may be 6-1 when he gets at least 6 shots and 1-3 when he doesn't.

This was a tough game to grade because outside of Rudy I don’t think anyone brought it the whole game.

Big improvement from the team that they locked in the second half. I think Ant and Jaden both had big flurries of offense. And looking at the box score Julius probably deserves a higher grade. I do think, Randle and Ant especially played bad habits basketball in the first half.

Got no big argument against it though.

Q-is-here wrote: ↑Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:49 pm I didn't love Julius's game today aesthetically, but he really stuffed the stat sheet and ended up with a team-best +22. He also cashed in on 12-13 FTAs, which helped us fend off a number of Utah runs. I'd give him at least an A-.

I'd downgrade Conley to a C-.

Agree that Clark and Dillingham were very mediocre.

I landed the same place - upgrading Randle to an A-and downgrading Conley to a C-. I was temped to push Conley down to a D+. He was a minus 13 and brought nothing positive.

I think Clark could have been a D this game.