Min vs Oak

A place for Twinscentric Discussion
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Min vs Oak

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

longstrangetrip wrote:
Camden wrote:Classic Burton. Gives away the game on a HR.

Yeah, I mentioned in an earlier game thread that I'm worried about him. At the end of last year his slider seemed to have lost its bite, and he's even worse this spring. We need somebody else in the 8th inning role.


I vote Theilbar.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Min vs Oak

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

Camden wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
Camden wrote:Classic Burton. Gives away the game on a HR.

Yeah, I mentioned in an earlier game thread that I'm worried about him. At the end of last year his slider seemed to have lost its bite, and he's even worse this spring. We need somebody else in the 8th inning role.


I vote Theilbar.

My first thought too, although Tonkin will be the guy soon I think.
User avatar
Jester1534
Posts: 3538
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Min vs Oak

Post by Jester1534 »

longstrangetrip wrote:
Camden wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
Camden wrote:Classic Burton. Gives away the game on a HR.

Yeah, I mentioned in an earlier game thread that I'm worried about him. At the end of last year his slider seemed to have lost its bite, and he's even worse this spring. We need somebody else in the 8th inning role.


I vote Theilbar.

My first thought too, although Tonkin will be the guy soon I think.


This is just another reason why to just give the keys to the young guys. There's no reason why Tonkin shouldn't be on this roster.
Post Reply