Carlos Danger wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:Wolves in a ducking weird spot now. Garza pretty much out of NBA games. So they can cut someone and give Garza a contract but if it's one year deal that lose his RFA rights. If they give him a multi year deal that might stop them from resigning Naz next year
I offer Garza a 3 year 12 (something in that cheap 3 year ballpark) and just let Naz go. Garza has shown me enough on offense that I think he could become as good as Naz is right now. Both are terrible defenders but Garza has a little more upside being younger and more raw.
With all the money going to Kat and Rudy a cheaper third/fourth big is more appetizing.
I had to double check, but Naz is actually younger than Garza by like 9 months. That said, I sort of agree with your take because I'm not sure they would want to pay Naz what he's worth to bring him back as a third center next year.
It seems like Naz has been in the league for a long time so I thought he had to be a year older.
It'd be cool to have both back but I think Garza can be had for way less as he is unproven. Garza is a little more roll of the dice obviously, but I think for the money he will get offered compared to Naz. I think I go Garza and hope he pans out. I am converting him now too so he can start filling in. Maybe we can get him for 4 years 11-12 million even. I was looking at comparable backups and it seems 2.5-3 mill per is in the ballpark for end bench guys. But we could also win big if he pans out.