TheFuture wrote:Q-was-here wrote:lipoli390 wrote:Q-was-here wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:I watched all of it without falling asleep.
It wasn't necessarily easy. The Wolves were depleted and the Thunder were... mostly bad.
But a nice win. Once again, Austin Rivers is ingratiating himself on yet another team. Year after year, team after team... the fanbase is treated to more and more Austin Rivers than they'd have ever expected.
He does play hard on defense and finally made some shots. I thought it was so Wolves-ian that he got called for all those travels. You absolutely know he would never be called for that if he played for the LA Clippers or Celtics. I'm not saying they weren't by-the-book travels, but c'mon, for that to be called so tight was such a joke.
Q - You are so right about the Wolvesian nature of those travel calls! And yes, Rivers plays really hard. If he makes shots, he's a net positive with his effort and toughness.
But kind of to Abe's point, you really don't want to HAVE to play Rivers 20+ minutes every night. He seems ideally suited to be a spot guy you put out there for very specific defensive matchups. Hopefully McLaughlin, DLO, and Prince get healthy soon so that he can go back to that role.
Rivers should be given Nowell's minutes. Either you're developing talent or you're trying to win. I thought they picked a course.
Nowell is in his 4th year so he's not longer green and they each offer a completely different set of skills. Nowell sucks on defense, but can create offense and Rivers (usually) sucks on offense but plays defense. I wouldn't call playing Rivers ahead of Nowell equivalent to trying to win more games versus developing talent. That seems odd to me that you see it that way. It's more of an offense/defense tradeoff.