lipoli390 wrote:Excerpt from Souhan article:
The "three stars'' blueprint for playoff success is no longer valid, nor is the "one dominant player'' model.
The Warriors are loaded with talent, but Klay Thompson is a lesser version of his former self. The other three teams rely on one star -- Jimmy Butler, Jayson Tatum and Luka Doncic -- and a cohesive group of non-stars.
The top four vote-getters in the NBA MVP Award -- Nikola Jokic, Joel Embiid, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Devin Booker -- did not make it to the conference finals. Kevin Durant, LeBron James and James Harden didn't come close.
In today's NBA, coaching, cohesiveness, defense and three-point shooting mean as much as star power.
Mmmmm. I have a few nit picks here, but I kind of agree with his overall conclusion.
First, he's absolutely wrong that Tatum is the Celtics "one star". What about Jaylen Brown!?! Granted, he's a notch below Tatum on the pecking order, but the difference between him and Tatum is a hell of a lot more narrow than the difference between Butler and Adebayo or Doncic and Brunson.
Second, what is a star? I consider Marcus Smart a star. He was the DPOY and can create his own shot in a pinch, as we saw him do multiple times against Miami. Draymond Green is a star too. He is also a perennial DPOY candidate and he is integral to the ball movement offense at Golden State.
But overall I agree with his conclusion and it sort of relates to the DLO thread I started. I think we want to become
more reliant on Ant and KAT offensively, while continuing to surround them with defenders, shooters, and high IQ type players.