sjm34 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Camden wrote:What an awful game from Thad. So bad.
Fuck yourself
I didn't know we had one of those types of boards.
You jumped on Thad Young super early in THIS game. And since a game is 48 minutes, he ended up with a decent (statistical) game. And your response to getting called out on it is "fuck yourself"?
Meh.
Has Young's recent uptick at least ended the logic that
"Thad Young is the worst player in the history of the league's 2nd worst franchise" right? The team is bad. It's terrible. Fucking horrible. Some of this is because of injuries. Some just because the talent isn't there.
Thad Young is part of the reason the Wolves suck. But, he's not the only reason. There is A LOT of blame to go around. His pariah status on this forum has reached absurd levels at this point.
[Note: Young seems to be a more willing passer. Is he becoming more comfortable in his role, gaining comfort with his teammates? In the first 29 games, he reached 5 assists only one time. In the last 14 games, he's reached at least 5 assists 6 times.]
This coming from the guy who posted on here a little more than a week ago whining about other posters skewing his comments. I guess I should expect this from someone who put words in my mouth and then later made a joke about those same words. Starting to see a pattern here Abe.
Is jumping "on Thad Young super early in This game" similar to jumping on Andrew Wiggins super early in his rookie year?
Btw, how does
"since a game is 48 minutes, he ended up with a decent (statistical) game" make any sense. One has nothing to do with the other. He could have maintained the same level of play, or even gotten worse over the course of the 48 minutes.
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
The (statistical) addition was meant to denote that "good" or "bad" based only on stats can be dicey. Young may have given up 83 points defensively, so saying he played a great game only based on stats can be deceiving. I was actually trying to be extra super duper cautious by adding the "statistical" disclaimer. Basically, I was walking on eggshells. Interestingly, I still get called on it...
As for the Wiggins stuff... for the 2,893th time, I simply stated he was playing mediocre or poor basketball at the time. There is NOTHING wrong with that. He's played MUCH much better since. That's been awesome. But I never said he couldn't improve. Nobody did. We simply said he was playing poorly and we hope he gets better. Meh. No big deal.
Look. Right now I'm being called to task for ripping another poster for saying "Fuck you" to another poster? Seriously? That's not what this forum has ever been about. I know we don't have real mods or anything but that's a slippery slope if we go that route. Or, if we keep this "Wiggins thread nonsense" alive and keep throwing it back and forth in people's faces... and skew original statement.s. This forum is on a dicey decline right now. And you know what? It's not because of me or q. Honestly. Go back and read our posts. We don't call people names. I think we both try to show respect to other posters.
Our initial comments about Wiggins have been blown entirely out of proportion. Ripping Thad Young has been blown entirely out of proportion. And Cool was called on it and responded in a very bad way. (I think he was being facetious in saying "fuck you" to me... but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt with that one.)