Leondro Bolmaro Watch

[MikkeMan]

I found information that Bolmaro would be 6'6-6'7 and that his wingspan would be 6'8-6'9 depending on the source. So he is not super long but has still decent length even for shooting guard and great for point guard.

I already consider him better prospect than Hezonja was at same age. I like especially how much he has improved from last year. Maybe it would be good for him to stay little longer in Barcelona since typically young players stop improving when they will arrive to Wolves.

Actually I think if Wolves get him to team next off season it can be thought like they would get 1st round draft pick a between 15 and 20 as I think he would go around that range in next draft, had he not been drafted last year.

[Monster]

For the people that like multi sport athletes and also wonder about Bolmoro's athletic ability.

https://www.euroleague.net/news/interviews/euroleague-2020-21/i/bdhw6rrv5odsf6mx/leandro-bolmaro-barcelona-i-still-want-to-do-track-and-field-sometimes

[Lipoli390]

For the people that like multi sport athletes and also wonder about Bolmoro's athletic ability.

https://www.euroleague.net/news/interviews/euroleague-2020-21/i/bdhw6rrv5odsf6mx/leandro-bolmaro-barcelona-i-still-want-to-do-track-and-field-sometimes

Great article, Monster. Thanks for posting. I do think basketball players with multi-sport backgrounds tend to be good. I also liked the video. I haven't been a fan of the Bolmaro pick, but I'm warming up to him.

[Q12543 [enjin:6621299]]

Bolmaro with a huge game earlier today - 26 points with some really hot shooting in a big win for Barca. He has had a very solid season thus far when you put it in the context of a 20-year old in the more conservative ethos of a European powerhouse.

[Lipoli390]

Bolmaro with a huge game earlier today - 26 points with some really hot shooting in a big win for Barca. He has had a very solid season thus far when you put it in the context of a 20-year old in the more conservative ethos of a European powerhouse.

Interesting. That's for the info. I've been a big Bolmaro skeptic, but I'm beginning to open my mind a bit on him. In spite of the Culver pick, this front office does appear to have a pretty good eye for talent as evidenced by Naz Reid, JMac, McDaniels, Nowell and Edwards. So perhaps they've done it again with the Bolmaro pick. They've hit pay dirt if he turns out to be the second coming of Manu.

[Monster]

Bolmaro with a huge game earlier today - 26 points with some really hot shooting in a big win for Barca. He has had a very solid season thus far when you put it in the context of a 20-year old in the more conservative ethos of a European powerhouse.

Interesting. That's for the info. I've been a big Bolmaro skeptic, but I'm beginning to open my mind a bit on him. In spite of the Culver pick, this front office does appear to have a pretty good eye for talent as evidenced by Naz Reid, JMac, McDaniels, Nowell and Edwards. So perhaps they've done it again with the Bolmaro pick. They've hit pay dirt if he turns out to be the second coming of Manu.

Mike Schmitz seems like he knew what he was talking about when it came to Lamelo Ball. Remember Bolmoro was a guy in this draft Schmitz really was in on.

[Lipoli390]

Bolmaro with a huge game earlier today - 26 points with some really hot shooting in a big win for Barca. He has had a very solid season thus far when you put it in the context of a 20-year old in the more conservative ethos of a European powerhouse.

Interesting. That's for the info. I've been a big Bolmaro skeptic, but I'm beginning to open my mind a bit on him. In spite of the Culver pick, this front office does appear to have a pretty good eye for talent as evidenced by Naz Reid, JMac, McDaniels, Nowell and Edwards. So perhaps they've done it again with the Bolmaro pick. They've hit pay dirt if he turns out to be the second coming of Manu.

Mike Schmitz seems like he knew what he was talking about when it came to Lamelo Ball. Remember Bolmoro was a guy in this draft Schmitz really was in on.

I didn't remember that Schmitz was high on Bolmaro. That's another good sign. Schmitz is one of the best draft analysts in the media.

[kekgeek]

Highlights from that game. Curiosity of Mike Schmitz.

https://twitter.com/Mike_Schmitz/status/1386337595882295299?s=19

[kekgeek]

Also like he is playing with Pau Gasol and Mirotic. Great practice of PnP/PnR with elite scoring bigs. I hope he is good.

[Monster]

Bolmaro with a huge game earlier today - 26 points with some really hot shooting in a big win for Barca. He has had a very solid season thus far when you put it in the context of a 20-year old in the more conservative ethos of a European powerhouse.

Interesting. That's for the info. I've been a big Bolmaro skeptic, but I'm beginning to open my mind a bit on him. In spite of the Culver pick, this front office does appear to have a pretty good eye for talent as evidenced by Naz Reid, JMac, McDaniels, Nowell and Edwards. So perhaps they've done it again with the Bolmaro pick. They've hit pay dirt if he turns out to be the second coming of Manu.

Mike Schmitz seems like he knew what he was talking about when it came to Lamelo Ball. Remember Bolmoro was a guy in this draft Schmitz really was in on.

I didn't remember that Schmitz was high on Bolmaro. That's another good sign. Schmitz is one of the best draft analysts in the media.

I'll add that I certainly don't want to give Rosas and company a pass but that draft 2 years ago which included Culver isn't exactly teeming with guys to get excited about in the first round after they picked Culver. Basically guys I feel like have really shown something in that first round it's Herro and then Washington who is a nice player who seems to be a decent starter at this point. I'm not saying there aren't guys like NAW that I like but right now or have done some good things but the only guy I'm really upset we missed out on is Herro who I did really want. I was wrong on Coby White (I wouldn't have traded up for him though) and so far you got that one correct. Lets see where we are another year or 2 with players from that draft I assume a least one other player will step up and look like a player we missed. I mean how many players taken after Culver in the 1st round would you rather have than Nowell? Remember going into that draft we both kinda kicked around how much we were/weren't intrigued with Romeo Langford? Lol I don't think either of us were anywhere near being all in on him or anything but his stats look abysmal. Trading up in that draft doesn't look to be a great move but there is a chance we ended up with not much more value if we hadn't made that move depending on who we selected or what pick or asset we combined Saric with. I'll still say that while Saric would be useful on this team Rosas did make the right decision to cash in on him it just didn't end up being the right move. Hopefully making some mistakes can be a worthwhile learning experience.

I still believe Culver could be worthwhile rotation player for the right team especially if he is paid the right amount on future contracts. Ultimately the fit with the Wolves isn't too good with all the guards they have (plus Bolmoro at some point) who need/should have the ball more than Culver. If I was a team with a need for a decent wing and had quite a bit of shooting I would want to take a flyer on Culver if it wasn't too costly.