Wolves win the lottery!!!

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24065
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Monster »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I don't think, wait I'm positive, Simmons and Russell can't play together.


I disagree. Russell can playoff the ball.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

PorkChop wrote:We complain about a lack of shooting then champion for Ben Simmons? I'm confused.


You don't need 5 shooters on the court at all times and he fills a major hole we have on defense with literally nobody who can guard an elite wing right now. Towns loves the perimeter more than banging around in the post so he can chill behind the arc while Ben does the dirty work around the rim. He also speeds up the pace by being able to take a rebound and get the break going and we're gonna need to be a high pace team with the lack of defenders we do have. Simmons with Russell, Beasley and KAT as shooters is a lot of space to work with. Much more than he ever had in Philly.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I don't think, wait I'm positive, Simmons and Russell can't play together.


A lesser league, obviously, but they were just fine at Montverde Academy winning two national championships together. I'd say they're at least familiar with each other.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I don't think, wait I'm positive, Simmons and Russell can't play together.


I disagree. Russell can playoff the ball.

I'll amend my statement. They can't play together if Russell expects to be the lead guard when they're both on the floor.
User avatar
Porckchop
Posts: 2512
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Porckchop »

If a guy literally refuses to shoot from the perimeter it sinks defenses in or to the other shooters. We'll have the Rubio situation all over again.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24065
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Monster »

PorkChop wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:We complain about a lack of shooting then champion for Ben Simmons? I'm confused.

He's a great, not good defensive player. We need defense too.

The league is encouraging more scoring by the way it is officiated ,adding one good defensive player while sacrificing all of it's shooting isn't gonna stop the other teams from putting up a lot of points. Teams win by having bigtime scorers on the court these days.


Part of the idea of adding Simmons using this pick is you get a legit good player now not wait to find out 3 years later you have a dude or whatever. His shooting is a problem but he brings a lot of positives. Personally I think the problem with adding him is...do we add that guy as the 3rd max guy? Is that really gonna be enough? That's a massive chunk of money on Towns Russell and Simmons and none of them has proven to be max guys...well Towns is worth max money but is he THE guy?
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by kekgeek »

khans2k5 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:We complain about a lack of shooting then champion for Ben Simmons? I'm confused.


You don't need 5 shooters on the court at all times and he fills a major hole we have on defense with literally nobody who can guard an elite wing right now. Towns loves the perimeter more than banging around in the post so he can chill behind the arc while Ben does the dirty work around the rim. He also speeds up the pace by being able to take a rebound and get the break going and we're gonna need to be a high pace team with the lack of defenders we do have. Simmons with Russell, Beasley and KAT as shooters is a lot of space to work with. Much more than he ever had in Philly.


Don't think we can get Simmons without Beasley but I agree with your point.

You can have 1 non-shooter. Especially when Simmons is elite at everything else.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Just so there is no confusing my feelings on this, if you have a chance to get Ben Simmons you do it. I don't think we can land him, but you do everything you have to do short of trading KAT.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

monsterpile wrote:
PorkChop wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:We complain about a lack of shooting then champion for Ben Simmons? I'm confused.

He's a great, not good defensive player. We need defense too.

The league is encouraging more scoring by the way it is officiated ,adding one good defensive player while sacrificing all of it's shooting isn't gonna stop the other teams from putting up a lot of points. Teams win by having bigtime scorers on the court these days.


Part of the idea of adding Simmons using this pick is you get a legit good player now not wait to find out 3 years later you have a dude or whatever. His shooting is a problem but he brings a lot of positives. Personally I think the problem with adding him is...do we add that guy as the 3rd max guy? Is that really gonna be enough? That's a massive chunk of money on Towns Russell and Simmons and none of them has proven to be max guys...well Towns is worth max money but is he THE guy?


I think Ben Simmons has shown enough already to think he can be the guy. He just needs to stay healthy and be surrounded by shooters.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24065
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves win the lottery!!!

Post by Monster »

PorkChop wrote:If a guy literally refuses to shoot from the perimeter it sinks defenses in or to the other shooters. We'll have the Rubio situation all over again.


I'll take a 6'10" version of Rubio that can actually finish at the rim...at over 70%
Post Reply