I don't get why Deni, Halliburton, Vassel or Hayes are not in discussion for #1 pick.
I will say I am in the anyone but Ball camp that said Ball shot 22% on all jump shots, but just 3s but all jumpers. Then watch him with his terrible shot selection and some of the worst defense I've seen in a long time i want nothing to do with him at all
Who should the Wolves draft at number 1?
- AbeVigodaLive
- Posts: 10272
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Who should the Wolves draft at number 1?
kekgeek1 wrote:I don't get why Deni, Halliburton, Vassel or Hayes are not in discussion for #1 pick.
I will say I am in the anyone but Ball camp that said Ball shot 22% on all jump shots, but just 3s but all jumpers. Then watch him with his terrible shot selection and some of the worst defense I've seen in a long time i want nothing to do with him at all
I've seen Hayes mentioned multiple times in the past couple of days at #1.
- Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
- Posts: 13844
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Who should the Wolves draft at number 1?
kekgeek1 wrote:I don't get why Deni, Halliburton, Vassel or Hayes are not in discussion for #1 pick.
I will say I am in the anyone but Ball camp that said Ball shot 22% on all jump shots, but just 3s but all jumpers. Then watch him with his terrible shot selection and some of the worst defense I've seen in a long time i want nothing to do with him at all
I'm not necessarily against any of those guys eventually being on the Wolves. I think the question is whether we get maximum value by taking any of those names with the #1 pick straight-up. I'd rather see us trade down from #1 to get one of those guys + another asset. In fact, Lip has outlined a number of scenarios like this. Vassell especially intrigues me.