lipoli390 wrote:monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:Here's a report from the New York Daily News earlier today.
"The belief among both league and player circles is that Irving is gone and the Seven-Eleven Era is over before it ever began. Irving only appeared in 103 regular-season games in Brooklyn, a three-year run ravaged in Year 1 by a nagging shoulder injury; in Year 2 due to absences for personal reasons; and in Year 3 due to Irving's unwillingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a city that didn't create a professional athlete exemption in its vaccine mandate until weeks before the NBA playoffs began." - via Kristian Winfield @ New York Daily News
Here's a report not long after the prior report:
"Kyrie Irving: Brooklyn Nets star Kyrie Irving is opting into his $37 million player option for the 2022-23 season, @TheAthletic @Stadium has learned. Irving is bypassing on multiple opt-in and trade scenarios to fulfill his four-year commitment to the Nets and Kevin Durant." - via Twitter ShamsCharania
This is such a great example of how unreliable NBA reporting is these days. The New York Daily News report above was typical of all the reporting from reporters and news agencies. Just about everyone was reporting that Kyrie Irving would be leaving the Nets. And they there was the growing swell of reports that Durant would force a trade too. But what actually happened? Kyrie opted in to the final year of his contract with the Nets. And of course, Kevin Durant will stay with the Nets as well.
Bottom line is that you really can't believe much of anything you read in the media about what's happening or going to happen in the NBA. It's a bunch of uninformed speculation in an echo chamber. The vast majority of NBA reporters no nothing more than we do. There are a few like Woj who are really well plugged and reliable sources of information. But there are very few.
Sources of reports certainly matter. I wouldn't trust the New York Daily news about anything related to sports. They seem about as reliable and a guy like Ben Platte a guy that watch's all the games, has a video podcast and writes his own articles...also he doesn't exist I made him up but I still might trust his info over the NY Daily News.
Also it's possible like Cam said there weren't exactly a lot of options so Kyrie opted in. Also just because he opted in doesn't mean he will stick around. Stay tuned...actually don't. lol
Yes, the source definitely matters. But in this case it wasn't just the NY Daily News reporting that Kyrie was on his way out of Brooklyn; it was just about everyone. The problem in today's media goes beyond just a few unreliable sources like Doogie and the NY Daily News. There's a tendency towards mass group-think in the media, and a single-minded undisciplined drive to get viewership combined with laziness and indifference to truth.
It's pretty amazing how Rubio ended up playing all those years with the Knicks right? :)
Lip you got me going on media...
There are few reliable sources out there when it comes to sports. I think we can all share a little bit of the blame for where we are. I'm absolutely not giving the media a pass but there are a lot of people that are simply clamoring for any shred of info. You see it on Twitter @XXXXX tell me______ about player XYZ" Some people are to willing to give it out. There is a reason people can be referred to as consumers.
What's great about the times we live in is I can choose to enjoy the type of content I want to listen to. Obviously this can also be bad. I can enjoy Wolfson's chats with various people on his podcast and fun tidbits of information on local MN people and not pay attention to the other stuff that may or may not be legit. I can enjoy Dane Moore and Britt Robson's banter and thoughts on the Wolves and the league even if maybe neither guy has any awesome insider information. I don't agree with all of either of their basketball takes but they watch all the games are truly passionate about the Wolves and are both reasonably insightful. I think they each bring interesting perspectives especially combined together. I'm not gonna listen to all of anyone's podcasts it usually gets to be too much.
I can skip all the meaningless chatter from ESPN or other media outlets shows that talk about everything and nothing. Often unlike years ago I can watch video of people saying what they say and make a judgement myself instead of reading a quote out of context in an article which MAY have not been intended to sway a certain way but did. I'm not picking and choosing looking to insulate myself to confirm what I think it's right...ok sure we all do to some extent but more than ever I've tried to seek out stuff that's meaningful to me and also look at views that are different than mine to try and understand them.
I'll say this that as Wolves fans we are quite fortunate to have a pretty good local media here covering the Wolves. Chris Hine took over for Jerry Zgoda who I think was/is a good dude in the wrong job and Hine is a solid sports beat writer that also does some worthwhile stories on players etc. I can't think of anyone that covers the team regularly that isn't worthwhile. Ok if Wolfson is the worst guy that covers your team you are probably doing well. Wolfson should get some credit for being a guy that does find out some lower level stuff and put its out there and it's nice to know sooner like who teams have worked out or have signed to the summer league etc. Dane Moore has moved from being more of a blogger type to being a true independent media guy. There are also solid fan sites like Canis Hoopus that aren't total homers and essentially worthless wastes of time to click on almost every time you go there.