CoolBreeze44 wrote:Q12543 wrote:LST, I guess I have a more comprehensive perspective on our performance than wins and losses. I look for example at some of our wins. REALLY close games that could have easily gone the other direction if not for some ridiculous shots (the Crawford corner 3 that he literally couldn't see upon release and the Wiggins game winning heave are two examples). Yes, credit is due to those two for actually making those shots, but these are 50/50 type games and in my opinion we simply got the karmic coin flip to go our way.
Also, SAS was missing Leonard; Golden State was missing Durant. These are literally their best players! And both teams pretty easily handled a full strength Minnesota team. I mean, we couldn't even keep it close? Really? These are teams we should be getting totally pumped up for.
I stand by my assertion that what I see on the floor is a 38-42 win team. I hope I'm wrong.
I guess I would ask if this team can't win half their games, what would it take to get there. We have stars, we have vets, we have a better bench. New coach? More shooters? Move to Seattle?
While I say this in a state of calm (i.e. I reserve the right to ask for Thibs head in the future!), I think if we end up around .500, as I suspect we will, he should probably be given one more year with this core. He'll have another shot at upgrading the bench (they need better wing depth) and the KAT/Wig will be one more year older.
I would also quibble with the "we have stars" piece. I think we have
a star in Butler, and frankly, he's not having the best year himself. KAT I hesitate on because he's now anchoring one of the league's worst defenses for the third year in a row. That was easy to overlook in Year 1, a little less less easy in Year 2, and now a lot less easy in Year 3. I just can't bring myself to calling someone a star that is so clumsy defensively, no matter how gifted he is on offense.