Camden wrote:With all due respect, SP, you're not understanding that once we give these second contracts to Dieng and the rest of the young guys, the wiggle room cap-wise to sign free agents that could significantly help this team will no longer be there like it is now. We'll be able to re-sign every single player we have regardless of what we do in free agency because of Bird Rights, which states that we can go above the cap to re-sign our own players. The question then will be about paying luxury tax, but that's even if it gets to that point. I'd love to have that problem, though. I'd love to have all this talent that's good enough to be maxed out. Right now, however, we need some surefire veteran help and we have the cap space right now and next year to add it with no problem at all. We need to take advantage of it while we can.
I'll be very surprised to see this team go into the tax and this starting five has the potential to put them there, or damn close, all on their own. I may be wrong, but I think it's far easier to build a contending bench with relatively inexpensive contracts when you have your contention quality starting unit in place and I personally would not risk that.
As I said in my original post, if they could get a 6th man of the year type then I'm good, but otherwise I'm looking for good bench players on 2-3 year contracts to maintain flexibility going forward. Flexibility is also why I'm not interested in trading the top 5 pick as we know Payne is going to cost us one already and cheap young talent is the key to a long window of contention that players like KAT, Wiggins, Lavine, and Rubio present.