Official 2016 Draft Thread

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by Monster »

TeamRicky wrote:
TheFuture wrote:I'd rather have Bazz than McLemore. Even if he can be extremely frustrating to watch.

I would like the idea of trading down for 2 picks and a vet/role player type, or for 1 pick and a better vet. Yet drafting 3 rookies is extremely unlikely for this team, and likely means we are trading completely out of the lottery. I'm not a fan of that. I also think Maker is trash, and would prefer to draft many players late in the draft before him.

Cole Aldrich and Luol Deng have been talked about here a lot, and I would love to get both of them. Chalmers is okay, though i'd be more inclined to just let Jones play more this next season if Chalmers was the choice.

I'd love for us to just make a decision on Pekovic. Just get it over with. But I fully expect to see him on the bench next year in a jersey or a suit.


My reasons for McLemore is that he was a very good college player (better than Bazz) that was super efficient scorer (42% on threes, 55% on twos, and 87% free throws) and had the athleticism to a be a good defender. He has the quiet demeanor of Wiggins but under the right coaching I think he could be a pretty good player. He's a better defender and passer than Bazz and based on his college numbers he has the potential to be a more efficient scorer. Since we are trusting Thibs to bring out the best in Wiggins, I think its worth taking a shot that Thibs could get McLemore (a similar tempermented guy) to play at a high level.


Just to be clear Bazz has been a more "efficient scorer" his whole career than Ben. Other than shoot 3's and have some physical traits what exactly makes Ben a good player? On the defensive side of the ball I'm not sure Ben's upside is too significant. It's been a very mixed bag there and the guy isn't that big either. If we can't get something better than Ben if rather just keep Bazz and hope he learns from Thibs how to play D and also improves his 3 point shot.
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8161
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by bleedspeed »

I was looking at McLemore and Murray seem to be pretty simular at least in size and as shooters. I would give Murray the slight edge as a shooter and ball handler, but McLemore maybe a better athlete.

I am cooling off fast on Murray for some reason.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 13468
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by kekgeek »

TeamRicky wrote:My Blue Print:
Sign Cole Aldrich, Luol Deng and Mario Chalmers
Trade #5 with Celtics for three picks and draft Luwawu, McCaw and Thon Maker
Trade Bazz for McLemore
Buyout Pek
Cut Smith, Payne, Rudez
Incoming: Deng, Aldrich, Chalmers, McLemore, Luwawu, McCaw and Maker
Outgoing: Payne, Smith, Rudez, Pek, Prince, Bazz & OpenSpot

PG: Rubio, Chalmers, Jones
SG: LaVine, McLemore, McCaw
SF: Wiggins, (Deng/Bjelica) Luwawu
PF Deng, Dieng, Bjelica, KG
C: KAT, (Dieng) Aldrich, Maker

That gives us good positional versatility and lots of two way players who can defend, pass and shoot 3s. Plus the rookies all are hardworking high upside guys who could payoff big down the road.


There is no way in hell that glen taylor is going to pay 2 guys to just get rid of them and why would pek agree to a buyout and we would have to cut payne so we still would be paying him. There is no way taylor agrees to that
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by Monster »

kekgeek1 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:My Blue Print:
Sign Cole Aldrich, Luol Deng and Mario Chalmers
Trade #5 with Celtics for three picks and draft Luwawu, McCaw and Thon Maker
Trade Bazz for McLemore
Buyout Pek
Cut Smith, Payne, Rudez
Incoming: Deng, Aldrich, Chalmers, McLemore, Luwawu, McCaw and Maker
Outgoing: Payne, Smith, Rudez, Pek, Prince, Bazz & OpenSpot

PG: Rubio, Chalmers, Jones
SG: LaVine, McLemore, McCaw
SF: Wiggins, (Deng/Bjelica) Luwawu
PF Deng, Dieng, Bjelica, KG
C: KAT, (Dieng) Aldrich, Maker

That gives us good positional versatility and lots of two way players who can defend, pass and shoot 3s. Plus the rookies all are hardworking high upside guys who could payoff big down the road.


There is no way in hell that glen taylor is going to pay 2 guys to just get rid of them and why would pek agree to a buyout and we would have to cut payne so we still would be paying him. There is no way taylor agrees to that


It's likely he is gonna have to pay them either way.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 13468
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by kekgeek »

monsterpile wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:My Blue Print:
Sign Cole Aldrich, Luol Deng and Mario Chalmers
Trade #5 with Celtics for three picks and draft Luwawu, McCaw and Thon Maker
Trade Bazz for McLemore
Buyout Pek
Cut Smith, Payne, Rudez
Incoming: Deng, Aldrich, Chalmers, McLemore, Luwawu, McCaw and Maker
Outgoing: Payne, Smith, Rudez, Pek, Prince, Bazz & OpenSpot

PG: Rubio, Chalmers, Jones
SG: LaVine, McLemore, McCaw
SF: Wiggins, (Deng/Bjelica) Luwawu
PF Deng, Dieng, Bjelica, KG
C: KAT, (Dieng) Aldrich, Maker

That gives us good positional versatility and lots of two way players who can defend, pass and shoot 3s. Plus the rookies all are hardworking high upside guys who could payoff big down the road.


There is no way in hell that glen taylor is going to pay 2 guys to just get rid of them and why would pek agree to a buyout and we would have to cut payne so we still would be paying him. There is no way taylor agrees to that


It's likely he is gonna have to pay them either way.


Correct but he has to pay them to go away then has to pay more money to whoever we replace them with.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by Monster »

kekgeek1 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:My Blue Print:
Sign Cole Aldrich, Luol Deng and Mario Chalmers
Trade #5 with Celtics for three picks and draft Luwawu, McCaw and Thon Maker
Trade Bazz for McLemore
Buyout Pek
Cut Smith, Payne, Rudez
Incoming: Deng, Aldrich, Chalmers, McLemore, Luwawu, McCaw and Maker
Outgoing: Payne, Smith, Rudez, Pek, Prince, Bazz & OpenSpot

PG: Rubio, Chalmers, Jones
SG: LaVine, McLemore, McCaw
SF: Wiggins, (Deng/Bjelica) Luwawu
PF Deng, Dieng, Bjelica, KG
C: KAT, (Dieng) Aldrich, Maker

That gives us good positional versatility and lots of two way players who can defend, pass and shoot 3s. Plus the rookies all are hardworking high upside guys who could payoff big down the road.


There is no way in hell that glen taylor is going to pay 2 guys to just get rid of them and why would pek agree to a buyout and we would have to cut payne so we still would be paying him. There is no way taylor agrees to that


It's likely he is gonna have to pay them either way.


Correct but he has to pay them to go away then has to pay more money to whoever we replace them with.


Sure but I bet he would be willing to pay up for someone if Thibs and Layden convinced him it was worth it to spend a couple extra million. Glen ain't getting younger. If there is enough injuries they may have to pay a guy they get for an injury exception anyway. I don't blame Glen for maybe not wanting to pay some decent amount of money if the team might not make the playoffs or the upgrade is very marginal but in Pek's case a player over nothing would be an upgrade. I still don't think anything happens on him until he proves he can't play for a few months.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by Monster »

bleedspeed177 wrote:I was looking at McLemore and Murray seem to be pretty simular at least in size and as shooters. I would give Murray the slight edge as a shooter and ball handler, but McLemore maybe a better athlete.

I am cooling off fast on Murray for some reason.


It's easy to go both ways on players when we compare to players who were disappointments or failures. McLemore has been a major disappointment thus far. Maybe there was a reason he slipped to #7 in an underwhelming draft. He had concerns about passivity/too unselfish and skills to create for himself...so far seem pretty legit. His shooting hasn't even been all that impressive. Even his FT% dropped below what it was in college. I'd actually compare him more to Wayne Ellington than anything which...um isn't quite fair because McLemore is still just 23 but he just hasn't been that good so far. Did anyone really see him only achieving Wayne Ellington status 3 years into his career? That's a surprise. Will Murray fail that badly offensively?

Contrast a bit between Murray and McLemore and see where we go.

McLemore is a better athlete than Murray and longer but Murray has more chance of being a combo guard so that helps his measurables a bit. That ability to handle the ball helps Murray's case quite a bit even if you don't think he is able to play PG it's better than Ben. Murray I think is a bit of an underrated athlete.

Ben scored just under 16ppg compared to Murray at 20ppg and both guys played off the ball on good teams. Murray for better or worse is a more aggressive player as a scorer.

Ben was supposed to be a solid defender but it sounds like a complete mixed bag every time I read about him. Murray...well how bad will he be or will be buck the trend and somehow be the Delly, Reddick or Curry who ends up being a quality defender at the next level despite underwhelming physical characteristics? I'm not betting on that but we are also talking about a guy that turned 19 three months ago his physical profile isn't set yet.

I wrote a lot here and I've said Murray is my pick of the guards that may be available but I'm not all in on him because there are some legit concerns about him. I do think it should be fair to recognize what he can and could bring to the table as a prospect and there is some potential there.
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8161
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by bleedspeed »

Great post Monster.
User avatar
TeamRicky [enjin:6648771]
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by TeamRicky [enjin:6648771] »

monsterpile wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:
TheFuture wrote:I'd rather have Bazz than McLemore. Even if he can be extremely frustrating to watch.

I would like the idea of trading down for 2 picks and a vet/role player type, or for 1 pick and a better vet. Yet drafting 3 rookies is extremely unlikely for this team, and likely means we are trading completely out of the lottery. I'm not a fan of that. I also think Maker is trash, and would prefer to draft many players late in the draft before him.

Cole Aldrich and Luol Deng have been talked about here a lot, and I would love to get both of them. Chalmers is okay, though i'd be more inclined to just let Jones play more this next season if Chalmers was the choice.

I'd love for us to just make a decision on Pekovic. Just get it over with. But I fully expect to see him on the bench next year in a jersey or a suit.


My reasons for McLemore is that he was a very good college player (better than Bazz) that was super efficient scorer (42% on threes, 55% on twos, and 87% free throws) and had the athleticism to a be a good defender. He has the quiet demeanor of Wiggins but under the right coaching I think he could be a pretty good player. He's a better defender and passer than Bazz and based on his college numbers he has the potential to be a more efficient scorer. Since we are trusting Thibs to bring out the best in Wiggins, I think its worth taking a shot that Thibs could get McLemore (a similar tempermented guy) to play at a high level.


Just to be clear Bazz has been a more "efficient scorer" his whole career than Ben. Other than shoot 3's and have some physical traits what exactly makes Ben a good player? On the defensive side of the ball I'm not sure Ben's upside is too significant. It's been a very mixed bag there and the guy isn't that big either. If we can't get something better than Ben if rather just keep Bazz and hope he learns from Thibs how to play D and also improves his 3 point shot.


I looked up their true shooting percentages and Bazz has had a better TS% but its not by a very wide margin. Ben has been a better three point shooter and free throw shooter over his NBA career. Because Ben had such a stellar TS% at Kansas, I wonder if playing in Sacramento has stifled his development playing with guys like Cousins and Gay.

On reason I consider this trade is that Ben is not a liability on defense like Bazz. He was 22nd of 81 SGs two years ago and 54th of 98 in RPM. Ben is a good athlete and has shown flashes on the defensive end and I think his potential as a defender under Thibs is greater than Bazz's potential under Thibs. Ben is far from a must have for me, but I think he is someone who was in a bad situation in Sacramento and still could blossom under the right coach. At the same time, I have pretty much given up on Bazz as ever getting it. I'm sure there are better options than both of them, but Batum will be too expensive and Bazemore will be on everyone's target list. I like Fournier, but he could be expensive and Orlando could match. Courtney Lee could be a good veteran option especially for a few years while we groom a young two way wing like Luwawu, McCants or Prince.
User avatar
JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Draft Thread

Post by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157] »

longstrangetrip wrote:
JasonIsDaMan wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:I want a guy who has the following trifecta of skills: good perimeter defense, ability to shoot 3s and good passer. There are a handful of guys that fit the bill that are projected to go in the 10-25 range. That is why I hope we acquire a second first rounder in the top 25 either by trading back a little or trading Bazz.


If Bazz is worth a top 25 pick, why not keep him?
If Bazz is not worth a top 25 pick, then who is trading a top 25 pick for him?
I know you're bored, but you don't need to post EVERY random thought.


Jason, would you say the same thing about Adreain Payne and Chase Budinger? Flip Saunders, a fairly well regarded NBA mind, thought both of these guys were worth a first round pick...and we don't know if he was the only one who thought so. Would you have advised Phoenix and Atlanta not to trade Bud and Payne for first round picks? Anyway, the value of a player is determined both by his natural ability and his fit on a particular team, and different PBOs might value players differently. I like a lot about Bazz...his non-stop motor and relentless offensive rebounding, his explosive vertical, and his quick release. But he also has a lot of flaws, as we all know. Thibs is going to come in and view everyone with fresh eyes, not as someone trying to justify keeping someone because he dealt for or drafted him. If he sees someone he thinks might be available later in the first round that fits better than Bazz, and someone is willing to trade a suitable pick for Bazz, I would be in favor.


1. Really? Payne? Payne was having a horrible year/career and Bazz is not. As far as Bud, he had some injury issues and that is why his career fell off the table. If the Wolves know something in that area, then fine, trade him. But that is in NO WAY what the poster meant.
A little bit of revisionist history in regards to Flip and his "prowess". I'm sure when he called ATL they didn't say "Oh my gosh, it's Flip. If we answer it, he'll rip us off, and if we don't, we'll seem rude. What do we do?" I don't remember the whole NBA stopping time to hire Flip when he was on "Sportscenter".

2. Bazz isn't a baseball card. He's a human being. He has overcome his, lets say, uninspiring start to become a good player and a good person. And he has made no public statements about wanting to leave. To say you would offload him for any pick between #10 and #25 is kind of a slap in the face. There is a lot of talk about players not wanting to play for MIN. Well, I don't think offloading guys for basically no reason is going to help that.

3. This happens every year. From the Tues. after the NCAA championship until 5 minutes before the draft starts, from 2005 until present, there is a thread like this on BSPN or here that basically becomes "Let's trade our 15 players for the other 435 players and lets trade our 2 picks for the other 58 {sic}" Don't get me wrong. On one level, the math is solid. If the other teams don't have enough players to play a game, they'll have to forfeit, and the NBA will have no choice but to declare MIN the champs. And it's easy to say "just ignore it", but I am afraid that someone from the Wolves see this and says "Well let's give the fans what they want" and I would like to make it clear that no, no it is not want all the fans want.
Bazz is not the reason they won only 29 games. No, trading the #5 pick for Ibaka will not fix it. No, trading down with SAC and getting one of their crap players (not Casspi, Cousins, or Collinson) will not fix it. No, trading down with MIL and getting a PG who can't get off the bench won't fix it (If Flip is well regarded, then Kidd, a HOF PG who has taken two teams to the playoffs since the last time Filp was there, is definitely well-regard, and if he's not playing the guy, that tells me something).

4. I stand by the "bored" comment. The Wolves didn't make the playoffs. The Wild were there a week. The Twins....ugh. And the Vikings are about 8 weeks away from starting camp. I mean, to literally say that ALL 16 of those players are ALREADY better than Bazz, well, that's boredom or a deficiency of some sort.
Post Reply