FNG wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:I look at the Toronto deal but then I look at their record and they won an amazing 4 more games then the Wolves did last season. The Wolves were also without DLO and KAT for much of the season. If I'm Toronto I'm in rebuild mode, I can't be giving up 1st rounders in order to acquire Simmons. My core simply isn't good enough for me to contend with Simmons/Siakim. I'm probably a .500 team at best at that point.
You may have come up with the reason Toronto is reported to be not willing to make the deal. But I see it differently. Covid had more of an impact on the Raptors than any other team with the NBA shutting them down for a couple weeks. And yet still they finished the season with a +25 point differential. Basketball Reference said they were the unluckiest team in the league last year, and should have finished 34-32. That said, Toronto still isn't biting on Philly's offer.
Yep. I'd say the Raptors season was an anomaly.
They were 53 - 19 the previous season with four of the same starters. That's better than any Wolves team in history. Do we really think they dropped off THAT much THAT quickly without other factors? A major difference was that each of those starters missed between 16 and 29 games.
They also played in Tampa for chrissakes. They basically played an entire season on the road. And they went full tank to finish the season, losing 10 of their final 11.
Look at this late-season Toronto starting lineup without its top 6 scorers:
Stanley Johnson
Malachi Flynn
Khem Birch
Jalen Harris
Yuta Watanabe
... and DeAndre Bembry and Freddie Gillespie played 30+ minutes off the bench.
[Note: I chose the Toronto deal as the best one. I think Sacramento is 2nd. I think any deal with the Wolves is an "eye of the beholder" type of thing. There are definitely teams that would not look twice at acquiring Beasley or Russell as the key get in a trade... whether they're smart or not is another argument entirely.]