Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
TeamRicky [enjin:6648771]
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by TeamRicky [enjin:6648771] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:I'm watching film on Zach Collins, both his strengths and weaknesses. In the strengths film he blocked Lauri Markannen three times (which made me less excited about Lauri). I worry that Zach Collins got a lot of blocks against inferior competition, so I'm not sure how well his shot blocking translates. In his weakness film, he didn't seem to get much elevation on his shots or even his shot block attempts (anybody know what his vertical is), so I think he'll have to thrive in the perimeter. I think his outside shooting looks fine. The best comparison I can come up with is Channing Frye. By the way, his face reminds me of a young Jim Petersen (when he used to have hair).

You're totally off base here. Did you watch the final 4? That was against good competition wouldn't you agree? He thrived on the interior. Today's Channing Frye is a terrible comparison for Zach's game. Swing and a miss here Ricky.


I'm not negative on him, but I'm not sold on him either. I wasn't scouting him in the Final Four game so I was relying on highlight films to form an opinion. But after watching DraftExpress video on him, I'm less sure of taking him at 7. I hope Isaac or Tatum falls to us, so it won't come to that. Right now to be honest, I think Frank gets me a little more excited than Zach.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

TeamRicky wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:I'm watching film on Zach Collins, both his strengths and weaknesses. In the strengths film he blocked Lauri Markannen three times (which made me less excited about Lauri). I worry that Zach Collins got a lot of blocks against inferior competition, so I'm not sure how well his shot blocking translates. In his weakness film, he didn't seem to get much elevation on his shots or even his shot block attempts (anybody know what his vertical is), so I think he'll have to thrive in the perimeter. I think his outside shooting looks fine. The best comparison I can come up with is Channing Frye. By the way, his face reminds me of a young Jim Petersen (when he used to have hair).

You're totally off base here. Did you watch the final 4? That was against good competition wouldn't you agree? He thrived on the interior. Today's Channing Frye is a terrible comparison for Zach's game. Swing and a miss here Ricky.


I'm not negative on him, but I'm not sold on him either. I wasn't scouting him in the Final Four game so I was relying on highlight films to form an opinion. But after watching DraftExpress video on him, I'm less sure of taking him at 7. I hope Isaac or Tatum falls to us, so it won't come to that. Right now to be honest, I think Frank gets me a little more excited than Zach.

Living in the Pacific Northwest I probably have an advantage in that I saw a ton of Zag games last year. I'm not sure he's going to be the best option at #7, but I think he can play inside and out. What I really like about him is his competitive aggressiveness. He really engages on both ends of the floor and you notice him out there. I can't see him disappointing at the next level.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24086
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by Monster »

Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


I just watched his workout video on draft express and his shooting all around the floor looked pretty legit. I don't want to put too much stock in those videos but it wasn't like he didn't show some shooting ability in his limited time in college. Because he played limited time I feel like considering what he might show in a workout could have a little more value than a guy that played 30+ games 30mpg etc.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by kekgeek »

monsterpile wrote:
Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


I just watched his workout video on draft express and his shooting all around the floor looked pretty legit. I don't want to put too much stock in those videos but it wasn't like he didn't show some shooting ability in his limited time in college. Because he played limited time I feel like considering what he might show in a workout could have a little more value than a guy that played 30+ games 30mpg etc.


Thing I love about Collins is he dosen't need the ball to be successful. Also he played the off the bench role in college so he dosen't need to adjust in that role.

He seems like another dog also and the wolves don't have many of them. Him and KAT have the potential to kill teams that go small.
User avatar
BloopOracle
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by BloopOracle »

Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


how exactly is a prolific 7 foot 3 point shooter not going to be able to punish smaller players when he can just shoot over the top of them? You tried to say anyone could just stick a wing on him like Pop did to Ryan Anderson but putting a little guy on a legit 7 footer in Markkanen is drastically different than 6'9 Ryan
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16263
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:I'm watching film on Zach Collins, both his strengths and weaknesses. In the strengths film he blocked Lauri Markannen three times (which made me less excited about Lauri). I worry that Zach Collins got a lot of blocks against inferior competition, so I'm not sure how well his shot blocking translates. In his weakness film, he didn't seem to get much elevation on his shots or even his shot block attempts (anybody know what his vertical is), so I think he'll have to thrive in the perimeter. I think his outside shooting looks fine. The best comparison I can come up with is Channing Frye. By the way, his face reminds me of a young Jim Petersen (when he used to have hair).

You're totally off base here. Did you watch the final 4? That was against good competition wouldn't you agree? He thrived on the interior. Today's Channing Frye is a terrible comparison for Zach's game. Swing and a miss here Ricky.


I'm not negative on him, but I'm not sold on him either. I wasn't scouting him in the Final Four game so I was relying on highlight films to form an opinion. But after watching DraftExpress video on him, I'm less sure of taking him at 7. I hope Isaac or Tatum falls to us, so it won't come to that. Right now to be honest, I think Frank gets me a little more excited than Zach.

Living in the Pacific Northwest I probably have an advantage in that I saw a ton of Zag games last year. I'm not sure he's going to be the best option at #7, but I think he can play inside and out. What I really like about him is his competitive aggressiveness. He really engages on both ends of the floor and you notice him out there. I can't see him disappointing at the next level.


Thanks for weighing in on this, Cool. To be fair, I had the same take as Ricky after watching the weaknesses video of Collins on draft express. He looked like he's seriously lacking in fast-twitch muscularity as video footage showed him getting stuffed or stifled trying to score down low and struggling to guard guys on the perimeter. On the other hand, he has a 9'3 overhead reach, which is definitely NBA caliber length for the center position. His rebounding stats on a per minute basis are outstanding and that's a stat that tends to tranfer to the NBA. His shot-blocking stats are so good on a per minute basis that I can't imagine him not being a decent shot-blocker in the NBA. He also looks like he has a really nice, fluid shot. I think he's going to be a terrific outside shooter. I also liked his interview. Sounds like a smart and hard-nosed kid who's going to be very coachable and determined to improve.

All in all, Zach Collins remains my consolation prize if Isaac, Jackson or Tatum doesn't fall to us. All the prospects look pretty bad in their draftexpress weaknesses videos. But I have to admit that Zach Collins looked worse than most. Of course, he looks great in his strengths video. So hard to know. That's why I'm inclined to defer to you as someone who's seen him play a lot.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16263
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

BloopOracle wrote:
Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


how exactly is a prolific 7 foot 3 point shooter not going to be able to punish smaller players when he can just shoot over the top of them? You tried to say anyone could just stick a wing on him like Pop did to Ryan Anderson but putting a little guy on a legit 7 footer in Markkanen is drastically different than 6'9 Ryan


Markkenan does look like a very good perimeter shooter. I don't put too much stock in his purported height in light of reports that he has short arms and, therefore, isn't very long. The fact that he declined to participate in the combine measurements supports the reports that he comes up short in the length department. I wouldn't be surprised if he has an 8'8 or 8'9 overhead reach. His pedestrian rebounding and poor shot-blocking college stats give us and additional window into lack of length or explosiveness. And reports on him certainly don't praise his defense. Statistically, he looks like a one-trick poney -- a perimeter scorer. Given his lack of length or athleticism and the much greater abundance of long athletes in the NBA, I can also see where NBA PFs and SFs might frustrate his shooting. I'm not totally down on Markkenan and I haven't seen enough of him to have a lot of confidence in my opinion of him. The good news is that Thibs has probably watched the full video of every college game Markkenan played this past season. So if Thibs likes him a lot, he should take him.
User avatar
MikkeMan
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by MikkeMan »

BloopOracle wrote:
Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


how exactly is a prolific 7 foot 3 point shooter not going to be able to punish smaller players when he can just shoot over the top of them? You tried to say anyone could just stick a wing on him like Pop did to Ryan Anderson but putting a little guy on a legit 7 footer in Markkanen is drastically different than 6'9 Ryan


Pop has used Bruce Bowen against Nowitzki as well with some legit success. So going with small against big that is really good shooter is not anything new. And Nowitzki had a legit post game compared to Markkanen. I watched some Instagram clip with Markkanen shooting 18 straight corner three pointers in minute. His shooting form was really good but I was little disappointed that his release looked little slow. Worst thing about his shooting was that he started always shooting motion by lowering the ball to waist level. If he does same in game situation, much smaller players are able to hack the ball away from him, when he is shooting. Luckily Lauri is still so young that he can hopefully get rid of that habit.

Personally I still think that Markkanen is the closest thing to Nowitzki as a prospect that we have seen. They have almost identical size as both are legit 7 footers with not that long wingspan. (7 foot in case of Markkanen) and neither has elite athleticism or was taught much as a defender or rebounder as draft prospect. Since Nowiztki didn't play any college basketball, it is little difficult to compare those two players but I still try.

Both players played in junior European championship games against other best players in their age. Here are stats from Markkanen against competition that generally one year older than he:

24.9pts, 8.6rbs, 1.0asts, 2.3stls, 1.3blks, FG% 50.4 3P% 39.4 FT% 83.3 in 26.4 minutes per game

When Nowiztki was draft prospect they didn't organize u20 championship games but just U22 championship games. Nowitzki played there at age 20. Here are his stats:

18.0pts, 7.2rbs, 0.5asts, 1.8stls, 0.0blks, FG% 41.5 3P% 39.5 FT% 87.9 in 32 minutes per game

With limited sample size statistics, it looks like Lauri is actually ahead Nowitzki as a prospect at same age. That matches comments from former German national team coach that has had opportunity to coach both players at same age. (he is currently Finnish national team coach)

Still even if I think Markkanen is better prospect than Nowitzki was at age 20, I wouldn't probably draft him for Wolves with 7th pick since I think Wolves need defense much more than offense. Comparing prospects to Nowitzki is problematic since he actually wasn't that good when he was 20, so many players have looked better than Dirk as draft prospects but they end up being busts or just mediocre players. What made Nowitzki so special is that he was able to improve so much after he entered to league. He is one of those rare players that has really reached his ceiling. Also I think that in addition of his elite shooting, Nowitzki has another elite skill; his mental strength that has been visible in several clutch plays. Many of his clutch plays have not even been related to his smooth jump shot at all. He has won critical play off games for Dallas by scoring on offensive rebounds, getting to free throw line and driving to hoop. He has even blocked Duncan's game winning lay-up attempt.
User avatar
MikkeMan
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves 2017 Draft Thread

Post by MikkeMan »

lipoli390 wrote:
BloopOracle wrote:
Q12543 wrote:The thing I like about Collins is that unlike Markkanen, he really will punish guys that go small on him. He is adept with either hand in the post and has a great touch around the hoop. And he will aggressively rebound the ball.

He needs to add a little weight and I'm not sure about his ability to defend on the perimeter - which is critical - but I like a lot about him if he's the consolation prize to Isaac.


how exactly is a prolific 7 foot 3 point shooter not going to be able to punish smaller players when he can just shoot over the top of them? You tried to say anyone could just stick a wing on him like Pop did to Ryan Anderson but putting a little guy on a legit 7 footer in Markkanen is drastically different than 6'9 Ryan


Markkenan does look like a very good perimeter shooter. I don't put too much stock in his purported height in light of reports that he has short arms and, therefore, isn't very long. The fact that he declined to participate in the combine measurements supports the reports that he comes up short in the length department. I wouldn't be surprised if he has an 8'8 or 8'9 overhead reach. His pedestrian rebounding and poor shot-blocking college stats give us and additional window into lack of length or explosiveness. And reports on him certainly don't praise his defense. Statistically, he looks like a one-trick poney -- a perimeter scorer. Given his lack of length or athleticism and the much greater abundance of long athletes in the NBA, I can also see where NBA PFs and SFs might frustrate his shooting. I'm not totally down on Markkenan and I haven't seen enough of him to have a lot of confidence in my opinion of him. The good news is that Thibs has probably watched the full video of every college game Markkenan played this past season. So if Thibs likes him a lot, he should take him.


Lip, Markkanen's overhead reach with shoes was measured to 279cm in summer 2016. It is about 9'2 in feet and inches. His wingspan was measured to 212cm, which is 6'11.5.
Post Reply