With all the negativity surrounding this team

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by kekgeek »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
mrhockey89 wrote:Pork, you're right it's a bit refreshing to know that it probably doesn't matter anyway. With that said, it'd stink to lose Butler for nothing in a year (I'm on board with trading him at the deadline because I think he and Kyrie have already made their minds up that they're going to NYK.

I think what's most disappointing though is that with all these young assets, Thibs basically traded half of them away to get us competing now, and it's likely to be gone in an instant. Mortgaged our future on guys like Rubio who wanted to be here (to get older with Teague), Lavine, Maarkinan, and Dunn, and we're going to have very little to show for it, outside of a taste of the playoffs. Perhaps there's a value in the team making the playoffs, but in a year or so when we're back at square 2 (not square 1 since we'll have Towns still), we will be back to the basement and wondering if Towns will walk after his 2nd contract or if he'll have the loyalty to stick it out while our younger guys improve.

Sad to say, but it looks like the 76ers did it right

Spot on post Hockey. When you can take the emotion out of having a taste of the playoffs you are left with basically nothing to show for this current rebuild. I agree totally.


See I don't necessarily disagree with you at the end of the day we are not looking like a title contender. I still don't blame thibs for going with it. I am a gambler so maybe this is why I still don't have a problem with it. Going back to last offseason in my head I was like, If Kat and Wiggins take the necessary steps that they are going to need to take no matter who is the coach or the surrounding players to win a championship we might be able to compete for a championship. If wiggins developed into an all star we would have had 2 all star wings that could make Durant and Thompson work on both ends. We had one of the only players in the NBA that owns Draymond and that is Kat, so the Warriors might of been forced to play big because of that. I also was fine with the Teague play because I think Teague would have made Curry work more on the defensive end than Rubio shown to that point. Also we got a future asset in the 1st round pick.

Now in the end things have went wrong and blame can go around in multiple ways. Wiggins has not developed even close to where he needs to be (I am still a wiggins backer), Kat has shown no improvement on defense what is huge in todays NBA being a big. One of the first round picks we got in the Butler trade has not played and is hurt again (poor luck).

Now in the end we cashed in some of our future assets to try and make a run at it but would we really be in any better spot if we didn't. We would have 47 million locked up in 2 players with potential but have not shown anything tangible of being above average NBA players in Lavine and Wiggins. Dunn is now fighting with his 2nd NBA coach in his 2nd year and the coaches are on the complete opposite spectrum in personality so it seems like it is more a Dunn problem. Also even when Dunn is playing he is a bottom 1/4th starting PG. Now Maarkanan looks good, now how good will he become is yet to see. Also people talk a lot about Rubio trade. Would you rather have Rubio and the 5 mil we had in cap space or Teague and Okoogie, also got to put in consideration Rubio will be a free agent next year when almost the whole league has cap space.

In the end things went wrong, the Gorugi contract is not dependable especially when he didn't have potential to be more than a role player and you shouldn't ever extend role players pre-free agency. In my opinion we are in a bad spot with the Butler trade or without the Butler trade, but we are mad because we are seeing how things are playing out so the unknown seems so much better ( a reason why I think this board has been more mad this year with a winning team than all the losses over the years because the unknown and hope of the lottery can change things.)

People also mention the Sixers a lot with us and I get it. But they also made terrible picks in Noel, Okafor, looking like Taytum for Fultz, MCW. But they didn't do it right, the reason they are better is because Embiid is a better 2 way player than Kat (Kat could end up better if he figures out defense) and Simmons is a top 25 player in the league while Wiggins at this moment is maybe a top 150 player. At the end of the day they play in the East and their 2 young studs are better than our 2 young studs.
User avatar
Wolvesfan21
Posts: 4115
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Wolvesfan21 »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:Then why is there so much unrest about how this past season turned out . Clearly the foreseeable future doesn't bode well for any team not named GS. Blame can be spread multiple ways with all kinds of solutions but the result is undeniable . Let's just field a competitive team. The NBA doesn't allow anything better than that for small market teams at this time.


GSW is a small market.

I think the negativity comes from Thibs. He's a negative person so it all starts up top.

WolvesFan, do you really believe GSW plays in a small market?


Yep. Oakland is ranked 46th in population size. Even if you throw in San Francisco you are still smaller then San Antonio. Market size is fairly overrated these days anyways. With TV exposure any market can become a large and popular market. Taxes is actually a harder thing to overcome. Of course with Texas, AZ and FL have none to little state income tax (more sales tax). Thus guys will make a lot more in those states.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

WolvesFan21 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:Then why is there so much unrest about how this past season turned out . Clearly the foreseeable future doesn't bode well for any team not named GS. Blame can be spread multiple ways with all kinds of solutions but the result is undeniable . Let's just field a competitive team. The NBA doesn't allow anything better than that for small market teams at this time.


GSW is a small market.

I think the negativity comes from Thibs. He's a negative person so it all starts up top.

WolvesFan, do you really believe GSW plays in a small market?


Yep. Oakland is ranked 46th in population size. Even if you throw in San Francisco you are still smaller then San Antonio. Market size is fairly overrated these days anyways. With TV exposure any market can become a large and popular market. Taxes is actually a harder thing to overcome. Of course with Texas, AZ and FL have none to little state income tax (more sales tax). Thus guys will make a lot more in those states.

Well, fact is the bay area is the 6th largest TV market. Then you factor in the desirability of the silicon valley and it is a monster market with few, if any peers.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
PorkChop wrote:Then why is there so much unrest about how this past season turned out . Clearly the foreseeable future doesn't bode well for any team not named GS. Blame can be spread multiple ways with all kinds of solutions but the result is undeniable . Let's just field a competitive team. The NBA doesn't allow anything better than that for small market teams at this time.


GSW is a small market.

I think the negativity comes from Thibs. He's a negative person so it all starts up top.

WolvesFan, do you really believe GSW plays in a small market?


Yep. Oakland is ranked 46th in population size. Even if you throw in San Francisco you are still smaller then San Antonio. Market size is fairly overrated these days anyways. With TV exposure any market can become a large and popular market. Taxes is actually a harder thing to overcome. Of course with Texas, AZ and FL have none to little state income tax (more sales tax). Thus guys will make a lot more in those states.

Well, fact is the bay area is the 6th largest TV market. Then you factor in the desirability of the silicon valley and it is a monster market with few, if any peers.


Gotta go with Cool on this one...everyone in San Francisco and San Jose claims the Warriors as their team along with Oakland, and that makes them easily a top 10 market. Leaving San Fran and San Jose out of the equation would be like leaving St. Paul out of our market.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

I'd feel a thousand times better about this team if we had drafted Jamal Murray instead of Kris Dunn, and then decided to keep Murray and not receive the draft pick used on Justin Patton in order to keep the balance in the Chicago Bulls trade. I still would have done the Ricky Rubio trade and I still would have drafted Josh Okogie, but I likely wouldn't have signed Jeff Teague in this scenario due to having Murray. We won't even get into the signing of Cole Aldrich, re-signing/overpaying Gorgui Dieng, or giving the max contract early to Andrew Wiggins -- all of these moves are mistakes, but they aren't truly crippling blows.

That one change in history -- Murray instead of Dunn, and then retaining him -- would have me feeling like the Wolves have the best of both worlds -- competing now and setting us up to compete in the future, and that's regardless of what happens with Jimmy Butler.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

From my perspective Thibs gave the young guys their shot to be mainstays on this team and they failed by winning only two more games in his first year coaching over the previous season. Lavine, Wiggins, KAT, Dunn, Ricky, Dieng. He ran with them in year one and they still finished 13th in the conference and whatever Thibs was selling wasn't working with them as a team. So year two he brings in some good vets and his guy Jimmy and would you look at that? We increase our win total 16 games. Do you guys understand how insane of a 1 year jump in wins that is? Now two of our more inconsistent players in Jamal and Belly are gone. Tolliver is brought in. Rose isn't great, but he is more consistent than Jamal at Jamal's advanced age. We continue to add youth to the roster and are right back to 6 guys under 25.

At the end of the day the bottom line of winning and losing matters. You have to win games. You can't just run on potential forever. For every Philly and GS there are two Sacramento Kings and Orlando Magic organizations that stay mired in the lottery for years and years. You don't go from lottery to contender overnight. Our ceiling may not be as high as Philly, but 2 of their 3 young guys meant to contend with can't stay on the court and that affects the bottom line. At some point you have to start winning and there was just no indication our young core could win games after back to back seasons basically winning the same amount of games even with a new voice in the locker room.
User avatar
Papalrep
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Papalrep »

If our destiny is 4 years hence, why did we trade zach Dunn and Markinnen for a 29 year old with a suspect knee?
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by kekgeek »

papalrep wrote:If our destiny is 4 years hence, why did we trade zach Dunn and Markinnen for a 29 year old with a suspect knee?


You hoped that Kat and Wiggins could take the neccessary steps forward to compete with the warriors last year or this year. They did not at this moment so at worst you get the young guys playoff experience that hopefully helps their development and makes a winning culture that makes Kat want to stay here and hopefully have players want to come and play with us. Not making the trade it would be more losing culture with all banking on potential.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24082
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Monster »

kekgeek1 wrote:
papalrep wrote:If our destiny is 4 years hence, why did we trade zach Dunn and Markinnen for a 29 year old with a suspect knee?


You hoped that Kat and Wiggins could take the neccessary steps forward to compete with the warriors last year or this year. They did not at this moment so at worst you get the young guys playoff experience that hopefully helps their development and makes a winning culture that makes Kat want to stay here and hopefully have players want to come and play with us. Not making the trade it would be more losing culture with all banking on potential.


Jimmy was 27 at the time of the trade and turns 29 in September. They also received #16 in a very deep draft. 4 years is a pretty long time in any pro sports league.

Personally I don't think this team is as far away as some people think it is if some players develop espcially Towns. He seemed to have no idea what was coming when playoff time came. I keep saying look at Houston it wasn't that long ago they looked like a pretty goood team built a good offensive player with no defense. They were a healthy CP3 from maybe winning a championship. They didn't give up they went for it and that Ryan Anderson contract which is huge and now a negative probably helped them get there.

As for the negatively around this team...some piece of it seems self inflicted. People can't seem to enjoy the team despite some of the positives. The other reality is if people enjoyed watching this team (some absolutely fair reasons for not enjoying it) I think they would be more happy with the idea of a good playoff team for the next 3 years. Since they don't really enjoy the team overall that's a much tougher sell. There were some very popular players moved last summer (people understandably haven't gotten over that) and some people perceive Butler as a problem now despite him doing a ton of stuff on the court we have been wanting to see for years. There is no guarantee they/we would have more enjoyment if the other scenarios were played out. That doesn't stop us all from hashing them out though! :)

We forget the human element in athletes and sometimes we forget or don't allow ourselves or each other to have a human element as fans. Subjectivity is great in theory but let's be honest it's only so realistic.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: With all the negativity surrounding this team

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

khans2k5 wrote:From my perspective Thibs gave the young guys their shot to be mainstays on this team and they failed by winning only two more games in his first year coaching over the previous season. Lavine, Wiggins, KAT, Dunn, Ricky, Dieng. He ran with them in year one and they still finished 13th in the conference and whatever Thibs was selling wasn't working with them as a team. So year two he brings in some good vets and his guy Jimmy and would you look at that? We increase our win total 16 games. Do you guys understand how insane of a 1 year jump in wins that is? Now two of our more inconsistent players in Jamal and Belly are gone. Tolliver is brought in. Rose isn't great, but he is more consistent than Jamal at Jamal's advanced age. We continue to add youth to the roster and are right back to 6 guys under 25.

At the end of the day the bottom line of winning and losing matters. You have to win games. You can't just run on potential forever. For every Philly and GS there are two Sacramento Kings and Orlando Magic organizations that stay mired in the lottery for years and years. You don't go from lottery to contender overnight. Our ceiling may not be as high as Philly, but 2 of their 3 young guys meant to contend with can't stay on the court and that affects the bottom line. At some point you have to start winning and there was just no indication our young core could win games after back to back seasons basically winning the same amount of games even with a new voice in the locker room.

You CAN go from lottery to contender overnight. In fact it's happened a lot. San Antonio hit the lottery and came up with Duncan - Result? Contender. The Celtics went from shit to adding KG and Ray Allen in one offseason - Result? Champion. The Sixers kept accumulating draft assets and went from shit to, you guessed it, contender. The Lakers sign Lebron, yes they will be a contender at least for a couple years.

Yes we increased our win total by 16 games. I can guarantee you we won't gain half that much this year. In fact we are going to have a helluva hard time making the playoffs. We're still the same dysfunctional group that took 82 games to make the last spot last year. Only now our best players aren't getting along. As far as I'm concerned we sold out too early to become an 8th seed, and now we've lost a couple rungs on the ladder. In a small market you can't make the mistakes this management team made and stay relevant.
Post Reply