Just a tidbit but Crawford has a career 3 pt percent of .349 and Beasley has a career 3 pt fg percent of .348. Just thought i would throw that out there.
crazysauce wrote:Just a tidbit but Crawford has a career 3 pt percent of .349 and Beasley has a career 3 pt fg percent of .348. Just thought i would throw that out there.
Fair, but volume matters and Crawford seems to take more threes above the break than in the corner.
I would argue shooting more you shoukd be better when you get in a better rhythm. I would take beas. He is in his prime and is a character and just feel he can do more than crawford at this point in their careers. I would take them both however as i do like crawford as well.