KAT and Wiggins

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:Is anybody really debating that Wiggins was the right choice at #1 that year? Why is anybody upset about that?

For me the point is that the guy was not a "sure thing" 3 years ago when others here kept telling us to be patient that there's no way he wasn't going to be a superstar... and more importantly, when Glen Taylor/Tom Thibodeau mortgaged the next half-decade by doubling down on his potential...

It's not ok to debate whether Wiggins was #1 worthy... it is ok to rip him every single day for playing at an average level (at best) 5 years into his career without any sort of meaningful and tangible improvement. And... it's ok to rip the two people responsible for falling for his promise "to play hard."

Go ahead and rip him every day if you like. Knock yourself out. I for one was wrong about him. I thought he might be a late bloomer. But I think it's safe to now say he isn't going to be the guy we needed him to be. We needed him to fulfill his promise so badly, I just couldn't admit to what he has become until giving him every chance. Congrats to all the Wig bashers who were able to come to that realization sooner. It really matters in the grand scheme of things.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Duke13 »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Excerpts from the Draft Express scouting report after his season ended at Kansas, but before the draft:

Yellow Flag #1
"He's for the most part a straight-line ball-handler, as the ball slows him down and doesn't do a great job changing speeds or directions, particularly with his off hand, but is capable of getting inside the paint effectively regardless thanks to his exceptionally quick first step".

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

Yellow Flag #2
"As a shooter, Wiggins is somewhat of a mixed bag. His mechanics are very good and he's a capable shooter with both his feet set or off the dribble, even if the results are inconsistent at this point—as he converted just 34% of his 3-point attempts on the year. His shot-selection leave something to be desired at times, he has a tendency for settling for long contested jumpers, but should be able to develop into a very solid outside shooter in time as long as he puts the work in."

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

Yellow Flag #3
"To reach his full potential, NBA teams will want to see Wiggins become more aggressive with the way he approaches the game. He has somewhat of a laid-back demeanor on the floor, which can be seen in the way he finishes around the basket at times, his tendency for shying away from contact, and his propensity for settling for long jumpers. He looks reluctant at times to just explode down the lane and dunk on people, which his physical tools suggest he should be able to much more frequently than he does. Part of that might have to do with his youth, lack of experience and strength."

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

So that's it? You found one source to support your point so now it's gospel? I did a quick search to see how many scouts labeled him can't miss, and spoiler alert, there was a lot of them. But all this aside, as this board often does it takes one item out of context and misses the real point. That real point was that the Wolves needed Wig to become an all star level player. Either that happened or this rebuild was going to fail like the others. And the travesty was that it didn't happen. Now he's been paid and we're stuck. Who gives a fuck at this point what he was labeled coming out of school?


Draft express is considerable pretty credible, Cool you started with the "labeling". I still have no problem with the trade. No doubt Wig had upside and potential, I'd take the risk again in a heart beat for with the situation we were in with Love.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Duke13 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Excerpts from the Draft Express scouting report after his season ended at Kansas, but before the draft:

Yellow Flag #1
"He's for the most part a straight-line ball-handler, as the ball slows him down and doesn't do a great job changing speeds or directions, particularly with his off hand, but is capable of getting inside the paint effectively regardless thanks to his exceptionally quick first step".

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

Yellow Flag #2
"As a shooter, Wiggins is somewhat of a mixed bag. His mechanics are very good and he's a capable shooter with both his feet set or off the dribble, even if the results are inconsistent at this point—as he converted just 34% of his 3-point attempts on the year. His shot-selection leave something to be desired at times, he has a tendency for settling for long contested jumpers, but should be able to develop into a very solid outside shooter in time as long as he puts the work in."

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

Yellow Flag #3
"To reach his full potential, NBA teams will want to see Wiggins become more aggressive with the way he approaches the game. He has somewhat of a laid-back demeanor on the floor, which can be seen in the way he finishes around the basket at times, his tendency for shying away from contact, and his propensity for settling for long jumpers. He looks reluctant at times to just explode down the lane and dunk on people, which his physical tools suggest he should be able to much more frequently than he does. Part of that might have to do with his youth, lack of experience and strength."

Source: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Andrew-Wiggins-6191/ ©DraftExpress

So that's it? You found one source to support your point so now it's gospel? I did a quick search to see how many scouts labeled him can't miss, and spoiler alert, there was a lot of them. But all this aside, as this board often does it takes one item out of context and misses the real point. That real point was that the Wolves needed Wig to become an all star level player. Either that happened or this rebuild was going to fail like the others. And the travesty was that it didn't happen. Now he's been paid and we're stuck. Who gives a fuck at this point what he was labeled coming out of school?


Draft express is considerable pretty credible, Cool you started with the "labeling". I still have no problem with the trade. No doubt Wig had upside and potential, I'd take the risk again in a heart beat for with the situation we were in with Love.

Yes, I called him can't miss. But c'mon, it had very little to do with my post. And yes, it was a good trade at the time. That's what makes it so disappointing.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by thedoper »

I think the biggest mistake with Wiggins was that they didn't let him go to RFA. That extra time would have been a healthy dose of reality for him.

Whether that was on Taylor or Thibs will have to wait for the book: "Losers: the Pathetic History of The Seattle Timberwolves Time in Minnesota."
User avatar
Wolvesfan21
Posts: 4115
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Wolvesfan21 »

thedoper wrote:I think the biggest mistake with Wiggins was that they didn't let him go to RFA. That extra time would have been a healthy dose of reality for him.

Whether that was on Taylor or Thibs will have to wait for the book: "Losers: the Pathetic History of The Seattle Timberwolves Time in Minnesota."


I can write it, BUT Not sure how well it would sell. lol
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24079
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Monster »

WolvesFan21 wrote:
thedoper wrote:I think the biggest mistake with Wiggins was that they didn't let him go to RFA. That extra time would have been a healthy dose of reality for him.

Whether that was on Taylor or Thibs will have to wait for the book: "Losers: the Pathetic History of The Seattle Timberwolves Time in Minnesota."


I can write it, BUT Not sure how well it would sell. lol


People love to fantasize about Wiggins going to RFA but the guy was gonna get a bunch of money from some team last offseason. The upside would have been him being locked into fewer years (like 1)...or gone for nothing. The reality is Wiggins came off a season he put up nearly 24ppg even if it was on a bad team and all that...he looked primed to be more than he was. He didn't. 2-5 million less he would have got probably isn't going to change the franchise's trajectory if he isn't anything more than what people feel he is now. If that's the case (he isn't very good) we can deal him this summer either for something of value or probably for nothing and people get what they want anyway.

It's kinda like the whole Pek contract people got all upset about that extra year Pek got. It turns out it didn't matter that salary didn't have any negative effects including Glen as insurance likely covered a big part of the money. I think ultimately if the Wolves have to move on from Wiggins someone is gonna be willing to take a chance on him. He is gonna play well enough this year to make a team interested.

One thing Wiggins has going for him in a trade to another team is even though he is maddening as in what you are gonna get out of him he seems like a guy that doesn't have any other issues off the floor or with teammates etc.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16263
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Lipoli390 »

monsterpile wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
thedoper wrote:I think the biggest mistake with Wiggins was that they didn't let him go to RFA. That extra time would have been a healthy dose of reality for him.

Whether that was on Taylor or Thibs will have to wait for the book: "Losers: the Pathetic History of The Seattle Timberwolves Time in Minnesota."


I can write it, BUT Not sure how well it would sell. lol


People love to fantasize about Wiggins going to RFA but the guy was gonna get a bunch of money from some team last offseason. The upside would have been him being locked into fewer years (like 1)...or gone for nothing. The reality is Wiggins came off a season he put up nearly 24ppg even if it was on a bad team and all that...he looked primed to be more than he was. He didn't. 2-5 million less he would have got probably isn't going to change the franchise's trajectory if he isn't anything more than what people feel he is now. If that's the case (he isn't very good) we can deal him this summer either for something of value or probably for nothing and people get what they want anyway.

It's kinda like the whole Pek contract people got all upset about that extra year Pek got. It turns out it didn't matter that salary didn't have any negative effects including Glen as insurance likely covered a big part of the money. I think ultimately if the Wolves have to move on from Wiggins someone is gonna be willing to take a chance on him. He is gonna play well enough this year to make a team interested.

One thing Wiggins has going for him in a trade to another team is even though he is maddening as in what you are gonna get out of him he seems like a guy that doesn't have any other issues off the floor or with teammates etc.


Monster- I agree that letting Wiggins become a RFA wouldn't have made much of a difference. It certainly woudn't have changed the way Wiggins plays. He is what he is and it's what some analysts warned about when he was coming out of college. The big mistake the organization made with Wiggins was not trading him before last season. What was apparent to many Wolves fans who watched him closely should have been even more apparent early on to the Wolves coaching staff and management - namely Wiggins' poor ballhandling, relatively low basketball IQ and lack of intensity to go with inconsistent shooting. There was also the lack of improvement. The best organizations know when to move on from players by seeing their weaknesses earlier and more clearly than other teams. Wiggins' trade value was at its peak after his rookie season. It's declined ever since then. The last chance to get good value for him would have been before last season - before the max extension.

Another lesson in all of this is the fact that you can't count on a draft pick, even a top pick, panning out. That's why the best organizations in rebuilding mode load up on young talent and future picks.

It's what the Sixers did. They hit pay dirt on Simmons and Embiid, although they had to show a lot of patience waiting out injuries to those two players. The Sixers also did well picking Saric and being patient in the face of uncertainty over whether and when he'd come over from Europe. They also took a chance on Covington when he was young. As a result, they were able to easily overcome what's happened with Fultz. And they still have two extra 2nd round picks next June and Miami's unprotected 1st round pick in 2021.

The Celtics are another example, drafting Smart, Brown and Tatum while still having a high lottery pick to use in acquiring a still young star in Kyrie Irving. And they're still going to have Sacramento's lottery pick next June as a result of the Fultz deal last summer.

The Lakers have been loading up on young talent through the draft and free agency, landing in just the last three years the following: Lonzo Ball, Kyle Kuzma, Josh Hart, Brandon Ingram, Moritz Wagner, Ivica Zubac, Svi Mykhailiuk and even Alex Caruso. All of those young players are currently on the Lakers' roster. That young talent was part of what attracted LeBron to sign there. And in spite of signing LeBron, the Lakers will still have cap room to sign another star next summer.

The Wolves made bad picks, taking Bazz over the Greek Freak, Dunn over Murray or Hield and Patton over Collins or Anunoby. Even worse, the Wolves sold a first round pick for cash - a pick that could have been used to take Rudy Gobert. As those who've been on this board and its ESPN predecessor know, I'm not relying on hindsight in criticizing these draft decisions. If the Wolves had made smart draft decisions that many rubes like me would have made, the Wolves could have flourished in spite of the miss with Wiggins. Imagine a Wolves team with KAT, Giannis, Gobert and LaVine. Because of the impact Giannis and Gobert would have likely had, I'm not sure we would have drafted high enough to get Murray. But who knows. In any event, it wouldn't have mattered that much. KAT, Giannis, Gobert and LaVine wiht Rubio would leave been a contender. Moreover, with Giannis here, the Wolves could have traded Wiggins two years ago and gotten really good value for him. Any number of things could have happened. But the bottom line is that the Wolves not only made draft mistakes, but also did a half-ass rebuild by failing to amass enough young talent and draft assets to withstand the inevitable failure of one of their picks - in this case Wiggins.

As I see it, the Wolves are still in rebuild mode. KAT just turned 23 and is under contract for five more years after this season. So the Wolves need to use players like Teague, Rose and Taj to acquire young high-upside players and/or first round/high second round picks. We already have a nice start with young talent like Okogie, Tyus Jones and Dario Saric. Covington is in the heart of his prime on a team-friendly contract.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

Agree with your last paragraph there Lip, but Wiggins and his contract is a massive impediment. They need to do whatever it takes to unload that contract this offseason in order to truly rebuild around KAT.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24079
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by Monster »

Lip the idea that Wiggins wasn't improving before they gave him his extension is a little unfair. He out up 23 ppg before that along with shooting a promising looking 35% from 3. Sure some of the things that were a problem was still there but remember that doing in on a bad team or whatever he was doing that as a 21 year old guy for most of the season. Teams lock up those types of players.

In your litany of bad moves what about trading Thad Young in a pointless season for KG. Look up what Thad Young made when he resigned and what the Nets got for him when they dealt him. Meanwhile Thibs and Layden inherited a guy that refused to play for the team and took up 8 million in salary. Bringing back KG if Flip hadn't passed probably would have been an overall positive but...overall if we are being honest it worked out VERY poorly. Meanwhile people rip on Thibs for ALWAYS doing win now moves bringing in his guys instead of getting more potential...
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT and Wiggins

Post by thedoper »

monsterpile wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
thedoper wrote:I think the biggest mistake with Wiggins was that they didn't let him go to RFA. That extra time would have been a healthy dose of reality for him.

Whether that was on Taylor or Thibs will have to wait for the book: "Losers: the Pathetic History of The Seattle Timberwolves Time in Minnesota."


I can write it, BUT Not sure how well it would sell. lol


People love to fantasize about Wiggins going to RFA but the guy was gonna get a bunch of money from some team last offseason. The upside would have been him being locked into fewer years (like 1)...or gone for nothing. The reality is Wiggins came off a season he put up nearly 24ppg even if it was on a bad team and all that...he looked primed to be more than he was. He didn't. 2-5 million less he would have got probably isn't going to change the franchise's trajectory if he isn't anything more than what people feel he is now. If that's the case (he isn't very good) we can deal him this summer either for something of value or probably for nothing and people get what they want anyway.

It's kinda like the whole Pek contract people got all upset about that extra year Pek got. It turns out it didn't matter that salary didn't have any negative effects including Glen as insurance likely covered a big part of the money. I think ultimately if the Wolves have to move on from Wiggins someone is gonna be willing to take a chance on him. He is gonna play well enough this year to make a team interested.

One thing Wiggins has going for him in a trade to another team is even though he is maddening as in what you are gonna get out of him he seems like a guy that doesn't have any other issues off the floor or with teammates etc.


I think Wiggins for 20 mil would have been a lot more palatable. And I think that's probably what the contract would have been in RFA. We're stuck with him for a couple more years, unless Toronto unravels in the off-season which could happen quite easily depending on Kawhi. I really don't think it's that big of a problem for now. When KAT starts getting frustrated with the lack of success that's when I would start to worry, but I personally don't feel that yet. I think most of the players are probably thinking of getting rid of Thibs first.
Post Reply