Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
ItsJustSoSab
Posts: 807
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by ItsJustSoSab »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:Can't explain this loss. I mean the defense wasn't good but it rarely is.


Tyus got abused. Really most of PG's did. KAT having to leave for a bit when he was on fire. Saric playing probably his worst game as a wolf. Wiggins reverting more to the Wiggins we all know and love(?). Strange rotations/subs. And the nail in the coffin: bone headed plays at the end of the game (Okogie, Rose, whoever slacked off Luka on that 3, Ryan Saunders for that terrible play that took so much time). Pretty straight forward
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by Duke13 »

longstrangetrip wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:mther fk

Bonehead play by Okogie. But Saunders encourages him when he comes off the court...that will pay off down the line


He never had the ball

That's what my honey is saying here too. Robson and I saw it differently...looked like he couuld have corraled the ball, but instead tried to make a behind the back hero play. I'll have to watch it again to see what happened.


He could of controlled it. Made a incredibly dumb play.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

monsterpile wrote:Josh Okogie ain't the reason we lost this game I will tell you that.


I don't disagree, but he needs to be smarter at the end of the game than he was tonight.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by kekgeek »

longstrangetrip wrote:
ItsJustSoSab wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Why didn't Rose take that open 3 for the win!?

Our players aren't too smart. Other team is making a lot of open 3's? Let's not guard them. We gotta shoot a 3 to win?!? Hell nah

Yeah, you gotta take the shot when it's there. We made 43.5% of our threes tonight and Dallas only made 34%, but they took 14 more of them. Credit Doncik for giving them good looks that Teague just didnt give our guys.


Hey Teague down the stretch, assist to towns, makes a floater, missed floater (Taj put back), teague sets up open 3 for saric who passed to rose for an open 3 he just didn't take it
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24079
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by Monster »

The worse thing I saw during the broadcast was the fan that couldn't guess the word "Park" with clues like swing set, paisley... it was hilarious seeing the hype guy having an exasperated look on his face when the guy didn't even make a guess. Lol
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by kekgeek »

Duke13 wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:mther fk

Bonehead play by Okogie. But Saunders encourages him when he comes off the court...that will pay off down the line


He never had the ball

That's what my honey is saying here too. Robson and I saw it differently...looked like he couuld have corraled the ball, but instead tried to make a behind the back hero play. I'll have to watch it again to see what happened.


He could of controlled it. Made a incredibly dumb play.


He should of caught the initial pass but I don't know after that. Klever was right there and they both going real fast
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

longstrangetrip wrote:
ItsJustSoSab wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Why didn't Rose take that open 3 for the win!?

Our players aren't too smart. Other team is making a lot of open 3's? Let's not guard them. We gotta shoot a 3 to win?!? Hell nah

Yeah, you gotta take the shot when it's there. We made 43.5% of our threes tonight and Dallas only made 34%, but they took 14 more of them. Credit Doncik for giving them good looks that Teague just didnt give our guys.


It's not just Teague though, it's Carlise's offense. Did you notice that the second Doncic got past the screen and headed down hill, there was always two guys planted in the corners and another guy flaring out for a 3 above the break, so if we sagged from any of those spots to help with the roll man, he had three different options to pass out to for 3's.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by Duke13 »

ItsJustSoSab wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Can't explain this loss. I mean the defense wasn't good but it rarely is.


Tyus got abused. Really most of PG's did. KAT having to leave for a bit when he was on fire. Saric playing probably his worst game as a wolf. Wiggins reverting more to the Wiggins we all know and love(?). Strange rotations/subs. And the nail in the coffin: bone headed plays at the end of the game (Okogie, Rose, whoever slacked off Luka on that 3, Ryan Saunders for that terrible play that took so much time). Pretty straight forward


JJ was a beast in PnR. They have shooters, were able to spread us out. I'd love to have a Powell and/or Kleber to play next to Kat.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by thedoper »

No surprising a HOF coach outsmarted Ryan a bit on this one. Fun game. Lots of missed contributions overall.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24079
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Saunders 2.0 - Game 2

Post by Monster »

longstrangetrip wrote:
monsterpile wrote:Josh Okogie ain't the reason we lost this game I will tell you that.


I don't disagree, but he needs to be smarter at the end of the game than he was tonight.


Kleber is a hustle actual athletic big it was not just an easy play to make to keep the ball.
Post Reply