Josh Richardson question

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

BizarroJerry wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:
BizarroJerry wrote:
secret agent man wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Richardson, Whiteside and 1st for Butler and Dieng



This is the exact offer I would do if I were the Wolves. It seems fair or in Miami's favor to me. I wonder if this something they would do.

As much as we would maybe have match up problems with Whiteside and Towns on the floor wouldn't other teams have problems guarding towns at the power forward spot?


I like this too.


I will be sick to my stomach if this is what the Wolves trade Jimmy Butler for.


Remember we're talking 60 cents, not dollar for dollar.


That isn't $0.60 nor should the Wolves feel forced to take a deal that isn't appropriate value. It's not this board's fault, but I'm tired of hearing about how the Wolves don't have leverage or that they will be forced to take an offer that's lower than what is expected in return of a star player.

Even the Clippers received more [than these hypothetical Heat offers] from the Rockets for Chris Paul and that situation was even more dictated by the player involved.

Maybe it's just the loser Minnesota mentality that fans have become accustomed to. I, however, can't adjust to that.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15305
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Lipoli390 »

KG4Ever wrote:We should focus on Richardson and move on from Bam. Richardson is the real deal and he's on a great contract. Bam is all hype and he's not even at Whiteside's level, at least yet.

Richardson, Winslow and 1st for Butler OR
Richardson, Whiteside and 1st for Butler and Dieng

I'm ok either way. Riley is not giving up both Richardson and Bam and a 1st, so we are just delaying things by being inflexible. The fact we are talking to the Clippers who don't have much to offer is telling and I am less excited by the possibility of landing Tobias Harris than JR as he will be an UFA and is a high risk of walking.


The Richardson, Winslow 1st deal doesn't meet the salary match requirement. Even adding McGruder doesn't get salaries to match, so the deal doesn't even work under the CBA without including Bam.

The Richardson/Whiteside deal would be a big mistake in my view. Pat Riley has been trying to get rid of Whiteside for over a year now and he can't find any takers. There's a reason Riley wants him gone and it's the same reason he can't find any takers. Whiteside clearly has attitude issues. Think of it this way. If Whiteside is such a cancer on a solid team with a terrific well-established head coach like the Heat, imagine his negative impact on the chemistry of a team like the Wolves, which is currently in disarray with a head coach teetering on the edge of being fired. Then you have to consider Whiteside's difficulty staying healthy and whether he'd mesh with KAT on the court. You don't want to tie up $25 million in cap space for two years on a guy like Whiteside. That's what bad organizations do.

Bam is more than hype. If he were just hype, Pat Riley would readily include him in a deal for Butler. The fact that Riley would have to be pushed to include him, assuming he ever would, tells us all we need to know. But you can look further at Bam's stats last season. As a 20 year old rookie with only 1 year of college, Bam averaged 5.5 rebounds and 6.9 points on 51% shooting in 19.8 minutes per game. Extrapolate those numbers to the 33.3 minutes Taj played and Bam averages 9.25 rebounds and 11.6 points, compared to Taj Gibson's 7.7 rebounds and 12.2 points. And again, Bam was a 20 year old rookie. Yes, he's not a proven player. That's the point. He's a prospect. But unlike a draft pick, he's already shown he can play and produce at a pretty high level in the NBA. It would be a coup to get him included in a Butler deal with Miami - and it's a coup worth holding out for.

At the end of the day, I'm convinced that Pat Riley would give up Richardson AND Bam if that's what it took to get Butler, but he'd probably refuse to include the 1st round pick. I'd be ok with that because the pick would likely be lottery-protected and the Wolves will likely have their own lottery pick. To make salaries match, we'd have to also get Winslow back and that could be a show-stopper although I'm not sure. If so, then we could broaden the deal to include Dieng and Tyler Johnson. I think Pat Riley would be thrilled to start the season with a starting five of Butler, Dragic, Waiters, Olynyk and Whiteside, backed up by Dwayne Wade, Wayne Ellington, James Johnson and either Tyler Johnson or Justise Winslow. Getting Butler to join the rest of that cast would make Miami the instant favorite for the 4th seed in the East and, with some luck, they could break into the top 3.

If we give up Butler for Richardson or Bam but not both, we will have failed to fully appreciate the value Jimmy Butler likely has to Pat Riley. He desperately wants to be relevant again, but he has neither the draft picks nor the cap space to make that happen without a major trade. And Jimmy is the only difference-maker available.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15305
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Lipoli390 »

Camden wrote:
BizarroJerry wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:
BizarroJerry wrote:
secret agent man wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Richardson, Whiteside and 1st for Butler and Dieng



This is the exact offer I would do if I were the Wolves. It seems fair or in Miami's favor to me. I wonder if this something they would do.

As much as we would maybe have match up problems with Whiteside and Towns on the floor wouldn't other teams have problems guarding towns at the power forward spot?


I like this too.


I will be sick to my stomach if this is what the Wolves trade Jimmy Butler for.


Remember we're talking 60 cents, not dollar for dollar.


That isn't $0.60 nor should the Wolves feel forced to take a deal that isn't appropriate value. It's not this board's fault, but I'm tired of hearing about how the Wolves don't have leverage or that they will be forced to take an offer that's lower than what is expected in return of a star player.

Even the Clippers received more [than these hypothetical Heat offers] from the Rockets for Chris Paul and that situation was even more dictated by the player involved.

Maybe it's just the loser Minnesota mentality that fans have become accustomed to. I, however, can't adjust to that.


Cam - I see your point and share your frustration. The issue is Butler's market value. To determine that, we have to try to get inside the minds of individual NBA GMs and try to see how they are likely valuing Butler right now given their particular team's circumstances. The teams that value Butler the most are likely those (1) with a near term focus who (2) have good reason to believe that adding Butler will instantly make them take them to the next level. I see two teams who fit that profile: Miami and Memphis. Miami fits for all the reasons I discussed on my other post a few minutes ago. Memphis fits the profile based on the age of their core veteran stars - Gasol and Conley. Adding Butler in Miami would instantly make the Heat the favorite for 4th seed in the East and an all-important home court advantage in the opening playoff round. Adding Butler to the Grizzlies would ensure they make the playoffs assuming Gasol and Conley stay healthy and they could finish as high as 3rd or 4th.

So in my view, those are the two teams - Miami and Memphis - who are likely willing to give up the most for Butler in spite of his contract situation, issues with teammates, injury history and the Wolves relative lack of leverage because of the timing. Washington might put a higher value on Butler now out of frustration over the ceiling they appear to have hit with their current core three - Wall, Beal and Porter. If we can get Beal or Porter for Butler that would be my first choice. I think the Sixers probably value Butler higher than a lot of teams as someone who can take them to that next level and beat the Celtics. The fact that they pursued KL suggests they should have a lot of interest in Butler. And since the Sixers have so many assets, giving us good value for Butler wouldn't be a high risk proposition for them. Would they be willing to give us Covington, Saric and a lottery protected 1st? Not sure.
User avatar
KG4Ever
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by KG4Ever »

Wiggins being MVP this year has as much chance of happening as Wolves getting Richardson, Bam and a 1st for Butler.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15305
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Lipoli390 »

KG4Ever wrote:Wiggins being MVP this year has as much chance of happening as Wolves getting Richardson, Bam and a 1st for Butler.


Miami will give up both Richardson and Bam for Butler. I agree they probably won't include their 1st rd pk with that deal.
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by worldK »

Will the kings take whiteside?

Butler and dieng and wcs to miami.

Richardson, bam, koufus and mclemore to wolves.

Whiteside and miami first round pick to kings.

Most agree miami wont trade richardson, bam AND a first for butler. Getting WCS might make miami consider trading away a future protected first. Wcs fits the playstyle of the heat.

Kings has 3 young bigs that they need to develop in bagley, labisierre and giles. Wcs is up for an extention and they might not want to sign hom long term with 3 young bigs with potential on the roster. They also have randolph and whiteside is signed for two more years and gives scoring that they need now.

For the wolves, we get richardson and bam and salary cap relief.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Monster »

worldK wrote:Will the kings take whiteside?

Butler and dieng and wcs to miami.

Richardson, bam, koufus and mclemore to wolves.

Whiteside and miami first round pick to kings.

Most agree miami wont trade richardson, bam AND a first for butler. Getting WCS might make miami consider trading away a future protected first. Wcs fits the playstyle of the heat.

Kings has 3 young bigs that they need to develop in bagley, labisierre and giles. Wcs is up for an extention and they might not want to sign hom long term with 3 young bigs with potential on the roster. They also have randolph and whiteside is signed for two more years and gives scoring that they need now.

For the wolves, we get richardson and bam and salary cap relief.


Maybe the Kong's don't know what they are going to do with WCS but there is no reason to give up an additional asset AND take on Whiteside for just a non lottery first round pick. That's a terrible deal for the Kings. I'm not even sure if they would take on Whiteside for that pick.
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by worldK »

monsterpile wrote:
worldK wrote:Will the kings take whiteside?

Butler and dieng and wcs to miami.

Richardson, bam, koufus and mclemore to wolves.

Whiteside and miami first round pick to kings.

Most agree miami wont trade richardson, bam AND a first for butler. Getting WCS might make miami consider trading away a future protected first. Wcs fits the playstyle of the heat.

Kings has 3 young bigs that they need to develop in bagley, labisierre and giles. Wcs is up for an extention and they might not want to sign hom long term with 3 young bigs with potential on the roster. They also have randolph and whiteside is signed for two more years and gives scoring that they need now.

For the wolves, we get richardson and bam and salary cap relief.


Maybe the Kong's don't know what they are going to do with WCS but there is no reason to give up an additional asset AND take on Whiteside for just a non lottery first round pick. That's a terrible deal for the Kings. I'm not even sure if they would take on Whiteside for that pick.


If that is the case then whiteside really has no value around the league. I see him as a better player than wcs or dieng. They will also get first in that deal and dump koufus and mclemore(both are not going to play much for them this season).

Kings have cap room this year and next few seasons. They are not likely able to sign any top free agents. Whiteside has 2 more seasons including this season. He contributes if given minutes and is a placeholder for them for two seasons. They get a pick out of their troubles and get something out of koufus and mclemore whom they are not going to retain after this season. I dont see this as a terrible deal for them.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by Monster »

worldK wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
worldK wrote:Will the kings take whiteside?

Butler and dieng and wcs to miami.

Richardson, bam, koufus and mclemore to wolves.

Whiteside and miami first round pick to kings.

Most agree miami wont trade richardson, bam AND a first for butler. Getting WCS might make miami consider trading away a future protected first. Wcs fits the playstyle of the heat.

Kings has 3 young bigs that they need to develop in bagley, labisierre and giles. Wcs is up for an extention and they might not want to sign hom long term with 3 young bigs with potential on the roster. They also have randolph and whiteside is signed for two more years and gives scoring that they need now.

For the wolves, we get richardson and bam and salary cap relief.


Maybe the Kong's don't know what they are going to do with WCS but there is no reason to give up an additional asset AND take on Whiteside for just a non lottery first round pick. That's a terrible deal for the Kings. I'm not even sure if they would take on Whiteside for that pick.


If that is the case then whiteside really has no value around the league. I see him as a better player than wcs or dieng. They will also get first in that deal and dump koufus and mclemore(both are not going to play much for them this season).

Kings have cap room this year and next few seasons. They are not likely able to sign any top free agents. Whiteside has 2 more seasons including this season. He contributes if given minutes and is a placeholder for them for two seasons. They get a pick out of their troubles and get something out of koufus and mclemore whom they are not going to retain after this season. I dont see this as a terrible deal for them.


If Whiteside opts into his deal next year (that's my assumption) that's 27 million bucks for 1 pick. There will be cap space next year but there will still be teams that are looking to get out of money including the Wolves and...Miami. I thought part of the deal was opening up chances for younger bigs to develop for the Kings I think whiteside could be a useful player but the King's don't need another big. Koufus is a solid player some team would probably gladly have either in a minor deal or as a buyout guy. He is still a plus defensive player and not a guy you have to play big minutes. He would be a nice guy for a team wanting sort of an Aaron Baynes type guy (when the Celtics initially signed him) to start and then not finish games. They don't gain anything by moving him now. Ben M...yeah definition of salary filler. I saw a tweet yesterday the Kings are wanting a ton for their cap space and have since the offseason started.
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3035
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Josh Richardson question

Post by WildWolf2813 »

worldK wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
worldK wrote:Will the kings take whiteside?

Butler and dieng and wcs to miami.

Richardson, bam, koufus and mclemore to wolves.

Whiteside and miami first round pick to kings.

Most agree miami wont trade richardson, bam AND a first for butler. Getting WCS might make miami consider trading away a future protected first. Wcs fits the playstyle of the heat.

Kings has 3 young bigs that they need to develop in bagley, labisierre and giles. Wcs is up for an extention and they might not want to sign hom long term with 3 young bigs with potential on the roster. They also have randolph and whiteside is signed for two more years and gives scoring that they need now.

For the wolves, we get richardson and bam and salary cap relief.


Maybe the Kong's don't know what they are going to do with WCS but there is no reason to give up an additional asset AND take on Whiteside for just a non lottery first round pick. That's a terrible deal for the Kings. I'm not even sure if they would take on Whiteside for that pick.


If that is the case then whiteside really has no value around the league. I see him as a better player than wcs or dieng. They will also get first in that deal and dump koufus and mclemore(both are not going to play much for them this season).

Kings have cap room this year and next few seasons. They are not likely able to sign any top free agents. Whiteside has 2 more seasons including this season. He contributes if given minutes and is a placeholder for them for two seasons. They get a pick out of their troubles and get something out of koufus and mclemore whom they are not going to retain after this season. I dont see this as a terrible deal for them.

They already had Whiteside before. I don't think they wanna deal with him again.
Post Reply