OT thread America

Discussion about general topics
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12109
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.


Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.


Riiiiight.

The point of the post is that I listen to many different voices on both sides and looney toons conspiracists like Bishop Larry Gaiters and dumbfuck Qanon guys.

FOX is just counter programming to NBC, both are partisan hack networks.

If you haven't watched Fox in a while, check out their daytime programming including Bret Baier. I think you might be surprised.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3010
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

Ok, good to see this thread get off the ground here.

Thanks for the tip on keeping things shorter Cool. I went back and highlighted what I think are the main points I wanted to make in my post earlier in this thread. Basically, I'm listing the evidence that would start to convince me I'm wrong, and asking others what evidence might do the same for them.

I think it's easier to have a more constructive conversation if we're developing our points fully. I read everything everybody writes and I think the shorter comments tend not to be as constructive, but I understand the need to make the content more digestible. I'll try to keep mine a bit shorter and use bold text to highlight the key bits.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3010
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

I'd still like to hear from everyone on all sides of this issue what evidence, if it existed, might get you to rethink your view on the question. I assume we can all agree that we need to draw a conclusion based on facts, and if so, we should all be able to identify what facts theoretically would change our minds, even if we haven't seen evidence of those facts and don't think they are out there.

The Media
In my post on page 1, one of the things I listed that would start to change my mind would be if major mainstream media outlets reported evidence of fraud. As we know, that hasn't happened, at least not yet. Based on the comments about the media here and the fact that the mainstream media has not reported evidence of fraud, it's clear that doesn't seem to have swayed those who believe the election was stolen. So a key question to ask is--why do some of us take the media as a legitimate source of information while some don't? It's definitely a key problem, and one we probably can't solve, but we should try to understand each others' views here.

I mostly read the websites of major newspapers and other news organizations--the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, LA Times, Chicago Tribune, the BBC, and the Independent and the Guardian (two British newspapers). Occasionally I'll go straight to the AP or Reuters websites. I also sometimes read German publicans like der Spiegel. I also regularly read articles on CNN and Fox News although I don't watch their videos or TV and I avoid their opinion folks like the plague. I think CNN and Fox News are sensationalistic, but I still think it's worth reading what they are reporting as they do both have news divisions and fact-checkers although I think you really have to stay away from the opinion personalities. I do also read political websites, though mostly for opinion rather than actual news, specifically Politico and the National Review (I'm not conservative, but I've always really liked reading their stuff and trying to at least be open to it--David French was one of my favorite writers there and he's at the Dispatch now).

I find those news organizations, the https://www.nytimes.comNYT, http://online.wsj.com/home-pageWSJ, https://www.washingtonpost.comWaPo, http://www.latimes.comLATimes, https://www.chicagotribune.comthe Trib, the https://www.bbc.com/newsBBC, the https://www.independent.co.ukIndependent, and https://www.theguardian.com/internationalthe Guardian, all to be trustworthy sources of information. They all have opinion sections and you need to keep that separate from the news divisions, and obviously you should always read everything with a relatively healthy dose of skepticism, but these media outlets are sources of fact-checked articles written by trained professional journalists and edited by professional editors for major institutions that would be (and sometimes are) seriously damaged by publishing falsehoods and therefore have additional motive to report the facts. Most of these papers also have public editors and/or other appointed officials outside the organization that act like watchdogs, and sometimes those watchdogs do catch problems (check out the Caliphate podcast controversy from the NYT last year). On the whole, that's pretty rare, and I do think I trust them more for having public editors and other watchdogs like that. When I compare what they report to primary sources of what they're reporting on--for example, you can read https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/03/us/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia.htmlthe NYTimes article describing the Trump-Raffensperger phone call and if you listen to https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/full-audio-call-between-president-trump-georgia-secretary-state-brad-raffensperger-election/6F7PDHDFDVCNTD3E76V7PIZWII/the actual call--I find the stories accurate. (To counterbalance Trump's claims of election fraud in that call, it's worth also listening to what the Republican election officials have said about it, which you can do in many places, including https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjKXvqSNIkkhere.) These mainstream news organizations have long histories of legitimate reporting that have helped us learn more about things like Watergate, or Vietnam, or the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, as well as a lot of other stuff. I know that a lot of upstart journalistic organizations have disparaged the mainstream media for years, and not always without cause, but I think a lot of that is more a result of them trying to compete or, frankly, to re-frame their partisan view as centrist. I'm also not swayed by politicians who disparage the media, whether it's liberals bashing Fox News or Trump bashing almost everybody. I think that's usually just scoring cheap political points or trying to undercut critical stories. I tend to have more faith in larger news organizations than smaller upstarts because I think they have more internal checks and are less likely to shift in a partisan manner. Basically, if a media organization has a long tradition, especially as a nonpartisan outlet, if they hire trained professional journalists, if they are fact-checked and edited by experienced editors, if they have public editors or other watchdogs, and if they have a high institutional incentive to the truth, I tend to find what they say more credible.

I wonder what those who are skeptical of the media think about those reasons. And I'd respectfully like to hear more specifically why they don't trust the media.

And going back to my original question for everyone on all sides of this issue, I wonder what evidence, if it existed, would change your minds.

(Ok, I failed the brevity test there, Cool, but at least I used bold text to highlight the key points! Thanks for anyone who reads all that.)
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 4593
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by FNG »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.


Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.


Riiiiight.

The point of the post is that I listen to many different voices on both sides and looney toons conspiracists like Bishop Larry Gaiters and dumbfuck Qanon guys.

FOX is just counter programming to NBC, both are partisan hack networks.

If you haven't watched Fox in a while, check out their daytime programming including Bret Baier. I think you might be surprised.


While my views of the 2020 election are 180 degrees away from those of CoolBreeze, I agree with him that the afternoon Fox programming is the gold standard in terms of reporting these days. I largely get my news from Morning Joe (which regularly includes noted Republicans in their cast, including the host) and afternoon Fox, although I do my best to research the validity of every comment I read or hear. I agree with Cool that Bret Baier is excellent, as well as Neil Cavuto and Dana Perino and Shep Smith before them. They all meet my first criteria for a favorable opinion...Trump dislikes them all! I only watch Fox and Friends and the evening programming for entertainment and laughs...it's basically 6 hours M-F of fellating the president.

As for the election, I still scratch my head at claims of widespread fraud, and have faith in the dedicated Republican and Democrat public servants to conduct a fair election. We're put in the position of having to decide whom to believe: 1)our election stewards from both parties, our Justice Department and largely Trump-appointed judges, all of whom have given their opinion that there is absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud, or 2) wild spit balled and unfounded conspiracy theories, mostly propagated by a president with a proven propensity to lie and the far right media and spokesmen like QAnon and One America Network (yes, I follow them sometimes too). And then there is the testimony of individuals who swore they saw fraud, but all the ones I have heard speak come off as credible as this woman sitting next to the disaster formerly known as America's mayor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19XOFuvkL3w

Look, I echo what Drew said in an earlier post...it has to feel awful to believe that your candidate had an election stolen from him or her. I don't discount how painful that must feel...I just question where the indisputable evidence is to support a very serious claim like that. Trump-loving friends of mine ask how Biden could have gotten so many more votes than Hillary did, and I tell them that it's easy for me to understand. First, Hillary was a terrible candidate with little appeal in Midwestern industrial states that Trump needed to win like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania...Biden obviously had much more appeal to that segment of the population. And second and even more important, Trump's disastrous 2020 results with educated white suburban women match my anecdotal experience...I knew a lot of women in that demographic, including my mom and my girl friend, who voted for Trump in 2016, but just couldn't stomach the idea of voting for him again.

It's easy for me to understand why Biden won by 7 million votes- frankly, I thought it should have been by much more given the two factors I cite above. Folks, it's time to move on.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12109
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

FNG wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.


Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.


Riiiiight.

The point of the post is that I listen to many different voices on both sides and looney toons conspiracists like Bishop Larry Gaiters and dumbfuck Qanon guys.

FOX is just counter programming to NBC, both are partisan hack networks.

If you haven't watched Fox in a while, check out their daytime programming including Bret Baier. I think you might be surprised.


While my views of the 2020 election are 180 degrees away from those of CoolBreeze, I agree with him that the afternoon Fox programming is the gold standard in terms of reporting these days. I largely get my news from Morning Joe (which regularly includes noted Republicans in their cast, including the host) and afternoon Fox, although I do my best to research the validity of every comment I read or hear. I agree with Cool that Bret Baier is excellent, as well as Neil Cavuto and Dana Perino and Shep Smith before them. They all meet my first criteria for a favorable opinion...Trump dislikes them all! I only watch Fox and Friends and the evening programming for entertainment and laughs...it's basically 6 hours M-F of fellating the president.

As for the election, I still scratch my head at claims of widespread fraud, and have faith in the dedicated Republican and Democrat public servants to conduct a fair election. We're put in the position of having to decide whom to believe: 1)our election stewards from both parties, our Justice Department and largely Trump-appointed judges, all of whom have given their opinion that there is absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud, or 2) wild spit balled and unfounded conspiracy theories, mostly propagated by a president with a proven propensity to lie and the far right media and spokesmen like QAnon and One America Network (yes, I follow them sometimes too). And then there is the testimony of individuals who swore they saw fraud, but all the ones I have heard speak come off as credible as this woman sitting next to the disaster formerly known as America's mayor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19XOFuvkL3w

Look, I echo what Drew said in an earlier post...it has to feel awful to believe that your candidate had an election stolen from him or her. I don't discount how painful that must feel...I just question where the indisputable evidence is to support a very serious claim like that. Trump-loving friends of mine ask how Biden could have gotten so many more votes than Hillary did, and I tell them that it's easy for me to understand. First, Hillary was a terrible candidate with little appeal in Midwestern industrial states that Trump needed to win like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania...Biden obviously had much more appeal to that segment of the population. And second and even more important, Trump's disastrous 2020 results with educated white suburban women match my anecdotal experience...I knew a lot of women in that demographic, including my mom and my girl friend, who voted for Trump in 2016, but just couldn't stomach the idea of voting for him again.

It's easy for me to understand why Biden won by 7 million votes- frankly, I thought it should have been by much more given the two factors I cite above. Folks, it's time to move on.

Biden didn't even campaign! They new they had it fixed on multiple levels:
- corrupt national and local politicians whether they were democrats or republicans in name only (RINO)
- Big Tech involvement skewing information and funding the corruption
- Corrupt media only delivering one side of the story for 4 years
- Testimony of Italian hack job and the switching of votes from Trump to Biden
- Mail-in ballot system wrought with fraud
- A virus created in a lab with implications similar to the common flu which served as a backdrop to all the coruption
- CCP influencing all items above.

Find a red/blue voting map and look at the number of counties Trump won. Then focus on the key swing states where everything was different in the large urban areas where the corruption was implemented.

Biden did not win by 7 million votes. The truth is he lost by at least twice that number. It wasn't close and don't let the mainstream media tell you anything different.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12109
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Drew, you can't say you find the New York Times and Washington Post to be trustworthy sources of information. To me, that ends our discussion. It tells me you've been brainwashed by the machine of the left, and anything else you have to say is tainted by that brainwashing.
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 4593
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by FNG »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
FNG wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Volans19 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.


Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.


Riiiiight.

The point of the post is that I listen to many different voices on both sides and looney toons conspiracists like Bishop Larry Gaiters and dumbfuck Qanon guys.

FOX is just counter programming to NBC, both are partisan hack networks.

If you haven't watched Fox in a while, check out their daytime programming including Bret Baier. I think you might be surprised.


While my views of the 2020 election are 180 degrees away from those of CoolBreeze, I agree with him that the afternoon Fox programming is the gold standard in terms of reporting these days. I largely get my news from Morning Joe (which regularly includes noted Republicans in their cast, including the host) and afternoon Fox, although I do my best to research the validity of every comment I read or hear. I agree with Cool that Bret Baier is excellent, as well as Neil Cavuto and Dana Perino and Shep Smith before them. They all meet my first criteria for a favorable opinion...Trump dislikes them all! I only watch Fox and Friends and the evening programming for entertainment and laughs...it's basically 6 hours M-F of fellating the president.

As for the election, I still scratch my head at claims of widespread fraud, and have faith in the dedicated Republican and Democrat public servants to conduct a fair election. We're put in the position of having to decide whom to believe: 1)our election stewards from both parties, our Justice Department and largely Trump-appointed judges, all of whom have given their opinion that there is absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud, or 2) wild spit balled and unfounded conspiracy theories, mostly propagated by a president with a proven propensity to lie and the far right media and spokesmen like QAnon and One America Network (yes, I follow them sometimes too). And then there is the testimony of individuals who swore they saw fraud, but all the ones I have heard speak come off as credible as this woman sitting next to the disaster formerly known as America's mayor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19XOFuvkL3w

Look, I echo what Drew said in an earlier post...it has to feel awful to believe that your candidate had an election stolen from him or her. I don't discount how painful that must feel...I just question where the indisputable evidence is to support a very serious claim like that. Trump-loving friends of mine ask how Biden could have gotten so many more votes than Hillary did, and I tell them that it's easy for me to understand. First, Hillary was a terrible candidate with little appeal in Midwestern industrial states that Trump needed to win like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania...Biden obviously had much more appeal to that segment of the population. And second and even more important, Trump's disastrous 2020 results with educated white suburban women match my anecdotal experience...I knew a lot of women in that demographic, including my mom and my girl friend, who voted for Trump in 2016, but just couldn't stomach the idea of voting for him again.

It's easy for me to understand why Biden won by 7 million votes- frankly, I thought it should have been by much more given the two factors I cite above. Folks, it's time to move on.

Biden didn't even campaign! They new they had it fixed on multiple levels:
- corrupt national and local politicians whether they were democrats or republicans in name only (RINO)
- Big Tech involvement skewing information and funding the corruption
- Corrupt media only delivering one side of the story for 4 years
- Testimony of Italian hack job and the switching of votes from Trump to Biden
- Mail-in ballot system wrought with fraud
- A virus created in a lab with implications similar to the common flu which served as a backdrop to all the coruption
- CCP influencing all items above.

Find a red/blue voting map and look at the number of counties Trump won. Then focus on the key swing states where everything was different in the large urban areas where the corruption was implemented.

Biden did not win by 7 million votes. The truth is he lost by at least twice that number. It wasn't close and don't let the mainstream media tell you anything different.


Frankly, I think I could have beaten Trump without campaigning, and I'm not that good! He's simply the least morally or intellectually qualified president in the history of this country and the country has four years to observe him, and many Republicans are privately (and now becoming more publicly) delighted and relieved that this dark national nightmare is over. (In fact, I would argue that most Republicans are happier Biden won than the far left that feel betrayed because he has totally ignored them in his cabinet selections). Heck, even a died-in-the-wool lifetime Republican like Chris Christie said on Sunday that he would vote in favor of impeachment if he were in the Senate.

Cool, I just took a drive across the country through those admittedly almost all red counties, and certainly saw almost exclusively Trump signs and flags, and the vote totals support my eye test. But there are hardly enough people in some of those counties to field an NBA roster. You gotta win the cities to win the popular vote, and there just aren't enough Trump voters once you get to any city or town with a stoplight.

But ultimately Dave Mason said it best: "there ain't no good guy, there ain't no bad guy, there's only your and me and we just disagree". Peace, brother.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12109
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Trump isn't morally qualified but Clinton was? Have you ever heard of Epstein Island? You won't find Trump on those flight logs. But you will find Clinton, CJ Roberts, and just about every celebrity who was openly against Trump. Obama was the most corrupt President in the history of the United States. Did you think that was monopoly money he sent over to Iraq on pallets?

Why wouldn't the Dems and Rinos allow a signature audit? What are they afraid of? If there was no fraud shouldn't that be an easy thing to agree to? I mean if you're so sure everything was legit, let us take a look. You know Goddam well why they wouldn't agree to this. If you don't agree the election was stolen, the only reason is you don't want to believe it.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3010
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:Drew, you can't say you find the New York Times and Washington Post to be trustworthy sources of information. To me, that ends our discussion. It tells me you've been brainwashed by the machine of the left, and anything else you have to say is tainted by that brainwashing.


I'm sorry you think that. I wish we could have a reasonable conversation. If you think that reading those two sources--among the many other sources I listed, including conservative news and opinion sources--means I'm so brainwashed that you can't even have a conversation with me then we really are in trouble.

I didn't expect that we'd necessarily change each others' minds, but at least try to understand one another's positions a bit better, think about our own views a little more clearly, and avoid the dehumanization that characterizes so many political discussions these days.

Dismissing the other person as completely brainwashed because of two mainstream sources they read is a very extreme position, one that reflects a lack of interest in a conversation let alone trying to figure out the truth. I know you wrote earlier that you weren't interested in a back and forth, but I was sort of hoping we could get something somewhat constructive going.


I'll just say this and you can reply or not.

If you're right that these elections were stolen as part of a long-running communist plot, I can't imagine how betrayed I would feel to think about all of the institutions and people that have been actively involved, complicit, or simply duped.

If you're right, it's not just Chinese communists or Democrats who betrayed you, but also elections officials in several states, including many Republicans, who must be complicit or guilty for pulling off one of the most logistically complicated frauds in the history of the world. All those Republicans who have accepted the legitimacy of the elections, now including Bush, Cheney, McConnell, Christie, Graham, and even Pence himself (basically all national Republican politicians except a handful of senators and--admittedly--over 100 House members), must at best be fools who deny irrefutable evidence, or worse, complicit in the overthrow of democracy in the country. You may even include Cruz or Hawley in that group as well, because even though both objected to certification, both have carefully avoided saying it was because the allegations of fraud were true, insisting that it was simply the existence of the allegations that was the reason they didn't want to certify.

If you're right that the presidential votes were fraudulent, then every Congressman elected in the recent election must also have been fraudulently elected since the same ballots were used to elect the President and Congress, making this an even more widespread fraud. If you're right, one-third of all senators and the entirety of the House were just fraudulently elected as well as Biden.

If you're right, then the fact that no major news outlet--including Fox--has reported that there was fraud despite the fact that it's their job to investigate the truth would be proof that basically the entire media is complicit in the fraud given the existence of irrefutable proof as you say. If you're right, the FBI and the courts, including many Republican and Trump-appointed judges, which have found no evidence of fraud or rejected cases on procedural grounds, must also essentially be complicit or negligent at best.

If you're right, the large majority of Americans who believe the elections were legitimate must also be involved, complicit, or duped into destroying our democracy. The vast majority of people outside the U.S. who believe Biden actually won--including basically every foreign leader in the world like Boris Johnson, Macron, Merkel, and others--must also have been duped as well. Basically, it must feel like almost the entire world has been fooled if they weren't actually in on the fraud themselves.

And if you're right that this election was irrefutably stolen, Trump's own admission that he would leave office on January 20th must feel like a final betrayal and surrender. If you're both right that the elections were stolen and he actually steps aside rather than standing his ground and refusing to leave even if it meant imprisonment or his own death, essentially he will have chosen his own freedom or his life over our democracy. I assume we both appreciate those who have served in the military and have sacrificed their lives for our country. If this fraud happened and if Trump actually leaves office on January 20th rather than standing his ground, arming himself if need be, and physically fighting to stay in office, then he will not only have failed to live up to their example, he will have betrayed their sacrifice. If you're right and if Trump doesn't go down literally fighting (which it looks like he won't), then in the face of the most shocking assault on the country in history, one that we agree would constitute the death of our democracy and of the nation itself, then Trump will have literally betrayed us by failing to sacrifice himself for the country.

If you're right, then on top of the realization of how deep and intricate this conspiracy has been, how widely it has undermined our democracy, how complicit so many people are, and how successfully this fraud has fooled the majority of the world, I can't even begin to imagine what that would feel like to be betrayed by Trump himself if and when he leaves office without a physical fight in a little over a week. I'm sincerely sorry for all of you who must feel that way.
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 4593
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: OT thread America

Post by FNG »

Thanks for that, Drew...very well written. I appreciate your attempt to be compassionate toward those who think the institutions of this country are broken and that the election was fraudulent, while also presenting the enormous hurdles those of us who believe in the strength of our wonderful democracy have to get over to understand the views of our brothers on the far right.

So what is in store for us now? I am a fan of the 2-party system, and see a Republican party that has to decide in the upcoming months who is their face...is it the true conservatives they have admired for decades like Romney, George Bush, Mattis, Colin Powell, Bill Kristol, George Will and Minnesota's own Dave Durenberger and Tim Pawlenty, or Donald Trump and his followers like Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan. I offer that if it is the latter, the party becomes a small tent party with no chance of success. Last month I asked my brother, a lifelong Republican who has become a Trumpublican, if he will welcome back to his party the conservatives I list above once Trump is gone, and he said absolutely not, and I told him his party may be dead. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I hope that the tragic events of the past week help the Trumpublicans recognize they have been following an emperor with no clothes, and help them return to the true conservative values that are the roots of the GOP.
Post Reply