kekgeek1 wrote:lipoli390 wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:KG4Ever wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Only in the NBA. LOL. Time for my idea of a separate league with competitive balance?
Enjoy the D-League or WNBA if you want that. The NBA has always had dynasties and that is not a bad thing.
Other than San Antonio, what dynasties have happened in small markets? I've seen Boston (4 times), the Lakers (3 Times), Chicago, and Golden State. If dynasties are only going to happen in major markets, what's the point? Show me Milwaukee vs Utah in the finals 4 straight years and I'll agree with you.
I don't expect the Wolves to necessarily win championships even though I'd love it if they did. I simply expect the Wolves to be in the running for an extended period (several yrs at least). By that I mean the Wolves as a team that other teams and observers consider a legitimate title contender. When you look at it that way, the list expands well beyond LA, Chicago, Boston and Golden State to include non-iconic franchises and even smaller markets. It includes San Antonio (several iterations over many years), Utah (in the Stockton/Malone era), Phoenix (Barkley era), Indiana (Reggie Miller era), Atlanta (Dominique Wilkins era), Cleveland (2 different LeBron eras and the Daugherty/Nance/Price era), Houston (Hakeem era), Dallas (Nowitski era, which included a championship), Miami (Wade/Shaq era, then Wade LeBron era), Portland (Walton era, Drexler era), Seattle (Gary Payton/Kemp era), OKC (Durant/Westbrook era). Note also that the Golden State Warriors has never had anything close to the same history or mystique as franchises like the Lakers, Celtics and Knicks. They build their own brand from scratch.
What do all those teams you mentioned have in common they have players who are top 50 to ever play the game. So how do you suggest we get that player. Kat needs to dramatically improve but he is probably the one guy on the roster who has any chance to get there or we should blow it all up and do the 76ers process and take our shots. Even the sixers made some really shitty draft picks during their process. So if you suggest tanking again, I can respect that but I just don't think that is realistic.
Duh. You win with great players. So what should the Wolves do? They should keep attempting to augment the team's talent and build a team of similar vintage talent paired with the right head coach. KAT is definitely good enough to envision becoming a great player. So you keep drafting and signing players until you land another elite player or two who can grow and peak at the same time as KAT. You won't hit on every move, probably not on most moves. But you keep trying. We were lucky to get the top draft pick a few years ago, which landed KAT. Wiggins in incredibly gifted. Maybe there's the right coach out there to develop him. Thibs doesn't seem to be. Get the right head coach -- someone in tune with the modern game and able to relate to young players or players generally. As for getting more talent, you don't need to tank. The Warriors got Klay Thompson with the 11th pick and Draymond Green in the second round. Draft a Donovan Mitchell with the 14th pick. Draft Murray instead of Kris Dunn and stick with him. Be patient with Zach LaVine like the Sixers were patient with Joel Embiid. I don't have specific answers, but there's an approach that has proven to work well for non-iconic franchises over the years. That's the model for success. My specific path for the Wolves at this juncture was what I suggested a month ago. Trade Butler to Memphis for the 3rd pick and draft Doncic who could be a franchise players. Or draft Bamba or Jackson with that pick along with Okogie and Bates-Diop.
Who knows, maybe Thibs drafted one or two gems in Okogie and Bates-Diop. If so, perhaps this team is actually on the right track already. We'll have to see.