Q12543 wrote:It seems to me that Thibs is putting more play making responsibility on Wiggins. He wants him to be Jimmy Butler 2.0 - but potentially even more potent. He also runs a lot of two-man action with Wiggins + KAT and LaVine + Dieng. All of this takes the ball out of Ricky's hands and forces him to be more of a floor spacer, which is not his ideal role.
The problem is that Ricky's heir apparent - Kris Dunn - is also not a floor spacer. Now, perhaps he develops a 3-point shot, but right now that seems a ways off.
The way Thibs is building this offense requires more of a 3 & D point guard like Derek Fisher was with the Lakers or Mario Chalmers with the Heat. The problem is Wiggins isn't nearly the play maker Kobe or LeBron were. And none of our current point guards have both the "3" and "D" as strengths.
We'll have to see how things evolve, but I'm pretty confident that Rubio is going to get traded eventually based on how Thibs is running the offense. The problem is we basically have a worse version of Rubio (worse for now at least) behind him.
Yes.
A lot of blame for Rubio's ineffectiveness/lack of impact. But let's not forget that Rubio was only about an average starting-level PG even when the ball was in his hands all the time. We know his awesomeness... and his flaws. Add them up and you have the Rubio we've seen for 5+ seasons now. Should Thibs be obligated to stay the course?
We've always acknowledged that he's an extremely polarizing player. Many teams wouldn't even look twice at "that type" of PG.
The question with the new regime was always about what kind of PG they wanted. Shouldn't be earth-shattering to anybody that a new regime has a different opinion of what needs to be done... especially if it's to enhance the value of players considered by almost everybody to be the future of the team.
Sans his stinkbomb last night, we've seen Wiggins appear to make a bit of a leap thus far. That's worth the trade-off, right?
[Note: That being said. Dunn looks terrible on offense.]