Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
MikeAz wrote:It sounds like Ricky could still be moved. I sure hope not.

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2017/06/wolves-still-looking-to-move-ricky-rubio.html

Trade him to Utah for #24 and draft Bell


Rubio is more valuable than the 24th pick, although I get the point would be to try to sign George Hill?

If we were looking for a PG in the draft, I like the Colorado guy, Derrick White.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24086
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by Monster »

SameOldDrew wrote:There are some good players who may be sliding down here tonight. I hope Glen has an extra pile of cash laying around that he lets Thibs use to buy us a second rounder.

I'm still not feeling great about Patton. I guess it's a bit of a home run swing. His mobility could make him useful on defense, and I like his ability to run the floor, but other than that . . . I just don't see much there. His horrific FT% suggests we shouldn't hold out any hope for his shot. Maybe he turns into a Hassan Whiteside kind of guy, who sucks for years and then blows up, but . . . meh. There are other guys who would have served a role for us.


Patton has some actual skill that he showed at creighton. He showed shooting ability, has some actual post moves and has some handles for a guy that big. I'm not saying he has all that for sure but he showed some stuff in one year of college. It's not just what he did in a workout like The Verticle guys have said this weak "against some chairs". Lol

Here is a long highlight real.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mzZUNYTNGeQ
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8239
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by 60WinTim »

Q12543 wrote:
SameOldNudityDrew wrote:There are some good players who may be sliding down here tonight. I hope Glen has an extra pile of cash laying around that he lets Thibs use to buy us a second rounder.

I'm still not feeling great about Patton. I guess it's a bit of a home run swing. His mobility could make him useful on defense, and I like his ability to run the floor, but other than that . . . I just don't see much there. His horrific FT% suggests we shouldn't hold out any hope for his shot. Maybe he turns into a Hassan Whiteside kind of guy, who sucks for years and then blows up, but . . . meh. There are other guys who would have served a role for us.


I think Patton is exactly that and someone Thibs is investing in for the long haul. He'll probably get D-League reps and we will try to develop him properly. I can't possibly see him being part of the regular rotation next year. Good. This is exactly what I wanted - No rookies in the main 9-man rotation!

We do have to work the free agent market though....we've got a couple holes to fill still!

The interesting thing is the addition of Butler makes the Wolves a much more attractive FA destination than they would be without Butler!
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

If/when Hayward leaves Utah, do we pass them?
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by TAFKASP »

monsterpile wrote:
SameOldDrew wrote:There are some good players who may be sliding down here tonight. I hope Glen has an extra pile of cash laying around that he lets Thibs use to buy us a second rounder.

I'm still not feeling great about Patton. I guess it's a bit of a home run swing. His mobility could make him useful on defense, and I like his ability to run the floor, but other than that . . . I just don't see much there. His horrific FT% suggests we shouldn't hold out any hope for his shot. Maybe he turns into a Hassan Whiteside kind of guy, who sucks for years and then blows up, but . . . meh. There are other guys who would have served a role for us.


Patton has some actual skill that he showed at creighton. He showed shooting ability, has some actual post moves and has some handles for a guy that big. I'm not saying he has all that for sure but he showed some stuff in one year of college. It's not just what he did in a workout like The Verticle guys have said this weak "against some chairs". Lol

Here is a long highlight real.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mzZUNYTNGeQ


That video makes him look like the kind of guy Rubio could make rich! Not sure what he has on his own though.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:If/when Hayward leaves Utah, do we pass them?


Still comes down to Towns' commitment to defense. Butler helps. He's not the crucial piece defensively though.
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by WildWolf2813 »

Just announce the pick live so I can go home happy
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

monsterpile wrote:
SameOldDrew wrote:There are some good players who may be sliding down here tonight. I hope Glen has an extra pile of cash laying around that he lets Thibs use to buy us a second rounder.

I'm still not feeling great about Patton. I guess it's a bit of a home run swing. His mobility could make him useful on defense, and I like his ability to run the floor, but other than that . . . I just don't see much there. His horrific FT% suggests we shouldn't hold out any hope for his shot. Maybe he turns into a Hassan Whiteside kind of guy, who sucks for years and then blows up, but . . . meh. There are other guys who would have served a role for us.


Patton has some actual skill that he showed at creighton. He showed shooting ability, has some actual post moves and has some handles for a guy that big. I'm not saying he has all that for sure but he showed some stuff in one year of college. It's not just what he did in a workout like The Verticle guys have said this weak "against some chairs". Lol

Here is a long highlight real.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mzZUNYTNGeQ


I've seen it. I'm such a loser I've seen all these videos of these guys. I'm not broken-hearted, I'm just not excited either.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

I'm surprised OG is sliding this far. I thought of him as a top 10 player in this draft.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24086
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Draft Dodgers Need Not Apply - GDT Wolves@Adam Silver

Post by Monster »

TheSP wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
SameOldDrew wrote:There are some good players who may be sliding down here tonight. I hope Glen has an extra pile of cash laying around that he lets Thibs use to buy us a second rounder.

I'm still not feeling great about Patton. I guess it's a bit of a home run swing. His mobility could make him useful on defense, and I like his ability to run the floor, but other than that . . . I just don't see much there. His horrific FT% suggests we shouldn't hold out any hope for his shot. Maybe he turns into a Hassan Whiteside kind of guy, who sucks for years and then blows up, but . . . meh. There are other guys who would have served a role for us.


Patton has some actual skill that he showed at creighton. He showed shooting ability, has some actual post moves and has some handles for a guy that big. I'm not saying he has all that for sure but he showed some stuff in one year of college. It's not just what he did in a workout like The Verticle guys have said this weak "against some chairs". Lol

Here is a long highlight real.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mzZUNYTNGeQ


That video makes him look like the kind of guy Rubio could make rich! Not sure what he has on his own though.


He is a local kid so this is fun for me but I really don't have any significant pull towards him. We could have picked a bunch of bigs and I would have been just as happy. Like I said in an earlier post pick a guy's name out of a hat I'm not sure one guy is significantly better overall than another.

However I do think Patton did show some versatile offensive game especially early on. Earlier in the he year he was considered a lottery pick. One thing some guys will like is he wasn't a top prospect type so he isn't entitled been hyped for years. He improved so much and he looks like he can add to his frame he used to be a toothpick. How does he fit into the new NBA? He may have some aspect of his offensive game to be a factor or hurt a team that goes small against him and Whateber other big is on the floor with him like Towns.
Post Reply