Q12543 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:Q12543 wrote:We had Prince and KG last year - both with rings on their fingers - along with Miller for the first part of the year. Yet none of these guys could prevent the abysmal mid-season slide (I think we went 4-21 for that stretch?).
Granted, we did eventually turn things around to finish the season with - whoopee! - 29 wins. Ironically, by then the veteran mentors were largely out of the rotation, if not completely out of the picture.
I mocked the "Garnett as mentor" narrative, but I think those guys actually helped a bit considering their brief stints and marginal on-court roles. I know the team added Towns, who played better than expected. But it was a 16-win team previously. And the coach/architect of the team died days before the start of the season.
I think those veterans helped steady the ship. And as we know, the team did show progress as the season went on. 29 wins was a nice step from 16 wins.
Was less than one season... and minimal roles... enough to create a team built on accountability and professionalism or whatever? Apparently not. This season, all that responsible falls on a chubby, loud 50+ year old guy who probably has next to nothing in common with any of these players. Assumption here: But do you think any of the young guys are seeking out Thibodeau to just discuss the game? Are they actively avoiding him when they can?
I think that's the #1 thing we're going to learn from this season. Hopefully, Thibodeau learns (already knows) it, too.
Don't forget another huge difference between '14-15 and '15-16 is that we had a healthy Ricky Rubio and we (eventually) ended the LaVine at PG experiment. Again, that had nothing to do with veteran mentorship or leadership, yet I would argue it was a big reason we won more games (along with KAT).
As for Thibs, it's a very valid question as to how he is connecting with his young charges. One of the things I felt was going to be a really positive factor heading into the season was that from the get-go, we were going with the same 5-man starting group that we ended last season with. And to this day, Thibs continues to stick with that group. Yet they have taken a fairly large step backwards from last year. I never would have expected that. I mean, that has GOT to not reflect well on Thibs, right?
Um, yeah. Most of us are probably in the business world in some fashion, and let's liken this to that world. Let's say you were hired at a salary quadruple that of your predecessor to lead a struggling but clearly improving company with great potential. Initially your arrival was met with great acclaim, but 1/4 of the way into your first year, the company is performing markedly worse than it was before you arrived under a reputed worse CEO. You don't think there would be a lot of discussion behind your back by your stakeholders? Well, this long-time stakeholder is attributing the lion's share of this early season failure to the only substantial difference from last March/April...the coaching staff. And I can assure you that this is a cntral topic of conversation when the ownership meets (most recently last week). I can't find any other reasonable explanation for the dramatic change.
I haven't watched much of this underperforming team the past two weeks except for the final 10 minutes in Charlotte (very impressive, BTW), but I am going to the game tonight. One of the things I will be focusing on is the difference in coaching styles between Pop and Thibs...like Lip, I'm lucky to have seats that let me easily observe the coaches, although I'm closer to the opposing team. I'm still holding on to hope that Thibs is smart enough to see the things he is doing that aren't working. I hope to see a much different Thibs than I watched in the last Knicks game I went to.