monsterpile wrote:khans2k5 wrote:monsterpile wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:monsterpile wrote:Forgot about the game I guess it wasn't a bad thing. I said they were going to lose one of these "supposed to win" games. It's a little early for that to happen but I'm not that shocked it happens.
Ok I didn't watch the game (and I usually don't like to make much out of a game I didn't watch) but I'm gonna rip Thibs here. The bench guys that some never play brought that game back agains the Sixers and he sticks with them in a game that was shockingly within reach (even if it was garbage time situation) and then a couple nights later plays some 2 guys over 40mpg. That's ridiculous. Meanwhile Memphis played 11 players and won while the Wolves played 8 guys. Play MGH.
Yep, I have not ripped Thibs much this year. But Teague and Taj have both complained about their minutes being to high. Then Thibs plays 3 starters 44 minutes. When the wolves score 11 points and make 3 FGs in the fourth. It was real sad.
If the wolves get the 8th seed or miss the playoffs, right or wrong Thibs is on the hot seat. Players are starting to complain a little bit and that is the vets. And we are in cap hell with him being the GM.
I'm with Jon K on this one he says he doesn't have as much problem with the starters playing big minutes (ok maybe not 43 mpg) but it just doesn't give the bench guys a chance to get a chance to play. Look at the Clippers. They are playing guys from all over the place and somehow they stayed above .500. It does feel like Thibs with his stick to his rotation type style doesn't give some guys a legit shot of helping the team. It's either play a ton of minutes or get 10-15 minutes. That's a legit criticism of him even if you think some of those guys suck a guy like Dieng isn't as bad as he has looked this year. One thought I had was maybe Thibs wants player to speak up for others to get them shots but after Teague said something and the bench did some good things...nope. It looked like Teague was rolling for a lot of this game but...idk. I know I have an optimistic view of guys and I like seeing development and more players playing but...it's frustrating.
There will have to be a collossal failure the rest of the season for Thibs to be on the hot seat. Why? One reason is look around the league there isn't some awesome coach available. You aren't bringing in some hotshot assistant to coach this group. There isn't a great crop of guys to go out and get and starting over again probably wouldn't be the way to go. Maybe it ends up being the wrong move but I want to give Thibs another year to see if he can do his thing and keep building.
We have Butler, KAT and Wiggins. We don't need a stud of a coach. We just need someone who isn't stuck in 2008. Look at what Nate McMillan has done in Indiana. That's a guy who nobody would have thought was near the top tier in coaching who, given the right team and situation, is a coach of the year candidate. Even a retread might be able to take this team to another level that Thibs won't.
12 month's ago NOBODY thought Nate Mcmillian was the answer and the same thought when he was hired. He still might not be the answer but he has done a heck of a job this year no doubt and the GM who got torched for what he got for Paul George put together a nice roster in the offseason. Thibs likely isn't going anywhere but I'm still up for seeing what he can do with this roster for another year.
The rub is that we're left hoping for Thibs to improve as a coach... AND... as a GM.
I was on board with the hire at the time. And I was even fine with giving him both roles. That was the mini-trend at the time. That changed quickly.
Isn't it only Stan Van Gundy and Thibodeau left with the dual role? And Detroit is out of the playoffs after a few years of mediocrity... and Van Gundy might be without a job.