The Case for Russell
- bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
Steph Curry is the league MVP. People questioned his athleticism, his is point guard skills; whether he was tough enough or could play defense in the NBA. Curry's skill level and work ethic were so high, he answered every question. And in a league where the rules make it almost impossible to guard crafty, versatile guards, there's a strong argument to make that having a player like Russell is more valuable than just a big.
Harden faced similar question marks when he entered the league. What position did he play? Is he athletic enough? Is craftiness and basketball IQ enough to lead to stardom?
In this league, at this time, the answer is yes. And the truth is that the Wolves have a talented point guard, Ricky Rubio, but he can't shoot. The Lakers' Kobe Bryant is aging and while Jordan Clarkson had a terrific rookie season, he's not the prospect the Russell is. The Sixers are devoid of shooting or playmaking in the backcourt. And the Knicks, despite all their talk about defense, they really need someone other than Carmelo Anthony who can put the ball in the basket.
The hardest thing to find in the NBA is scoring, virtually every GM will tell you. And Russell is the most versatile, lethal scorer in this draft.
"He's my favorite basketball player in this draft," one general manager said. "Maybe you have to take Towns because of his abilities at his size. But I don't think it's a given the way it was a decade ago, when Greg Oden went ahead of Kevin Durant. I think with success of Curry, Harden and Draymond Green, you'll see more guys focusing on skills and playmaking abilities. To have great size or jump-out-of-the-gym athleticism is great. But watch the most successful teams and you'll see they have talented playmakers who don't necessarily beat you with raw athleticism or size (LeBron's the exception to everything), but with knowing how to play the game. Bigs don't rule our game any more. Versatile guards do. And Russell is the best guard in this draft."
Underrated no more.
Harden faced similar question marks when he entered the league. What position did he play? Is he athletic enough? Is craftiness and basketball IQ enough to lead to stardom?
In this league, at this time, the answer is yes. And the truth is that the Wolves have a talented point guard, Ricky Rubio, but he can't shoot. The Lakers' Kobe Bryant is aging and while Jordan Clarkson had a terrific rookie season, he's not the prospect the Russell is. The Sixers are devoid of shooting or playmaking in the backcourt. And the Knicks, despite all their talk about defense, they really need someone other than Carmelo Anthony who can put the ball in the basket.
The hardest thing to find in the NBA is scoring, virtually every GM will tell you. And Russell is the most versatile, lethal scorer in this draft.
"He's my favorite basketball player in this draft," one general manager said. "Maybe you have to take Towns because of his abilities at his size. But I don't think it's a given the way it was a decade ago, when Greg Oden went ahead of Kevin Durant. I think with success of Curry, Harden and Draymond Green, you'll see more guys focusing on skills and playmaking abilities. To have great size or jump-out-of-the-gym athleticism is great. But watch the most successful teams and you'll see they have talented playmakers who don't necessarily beat you with raw athleticism or size (LeBron's the exception to everything), but with knowing how to play the game. Bigs don't rule our game any more. Versatile guards do. And Russell is the best guard in this draft."
Underrated no more.
- bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
You can read what Ford said or my summary on the first post of this thread to save yourself some time.
- TRKO [enjin:12664595]
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
bleedspeed177 wrote:You can read what Ford said or my summary on the first post of this thread to save yourself some time.
You have better credibility and are a much more efficient writer, so I pick you.
- bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
Man I would love to get Russell and Towns out of this draft. I would trade everything but Wiggins to make it happen.
Re: The Case for Russell
bleedspeed177 wrote:Man I would love to get Russell and Towns out of this draft. I would trade everything but Wiggins to make it happen.
I'm going to feel bad for you Bleed when the Wolves pick Okafor
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 13192
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
bleedspeed177 wrote:You can read what Ford said or my summary on the first post of this thread to save yourself some time.
Hahahahaha - Russell is awesome.
Still my favorite post.
Re: The Case for Russell
Thanks for posting that article Bleed it was a good read. Bottom line is skill and improving your game outweighs athletic ability and physical skills etc. Russell has plenty of the physical tools imo.
Re: The Case for Russell
The case for Russell...
The starting centers in the Finals
Andrew Bogut #1 overall pick
Timofey Mosgov undrafted
The starting centers in the Finals
Andrew Bogut #1 overall pick
Timofey Mosgov undrafted
- khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: The Case for Russell
monsterpile wrote:The case for Russell...
The starting centers in the Finals
Andrew Bogut #1 overall pick
Timofey Mosgov undrafted
Starting guards:
Steph Curry
Kyrie Irving
Re: The Case for Russell
khans2k5 wrote:monsterpile wrote:The case for Russell...
The starting centers in the Finals
Andrew Bogut #1 overall pick
Timofey Mosgov undrafted
Starting guards:
Steph Curry
Kyrie Irving
Preaching to the choir here. Gather star potential on the perimeter and piece in defensive specialists down low.