The Case for Towns

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Camden wrote:You all realize that I don't care how you feel about me, right? If not, then there's your clarification. So, you as a group can continue to whine and be soft about the way I post, or you can move past it. The ball's in your court. What you do with it is up to you.

Why did it take so long for your true character to show through? Are you sure LST didn't slip something in your Shirley Temple today?
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by thedoper »

Camden wrote:You all realize that I don't care how you feel about me, right? If not, then there's your clarification. So, you as a group can continue to whine and be soft about the way I post, or you can move past it. The ball's in your court. What you do with it is up to you.


I don't believe it. Otherwise you wouldn't go to such great lengths to prove to us how much you know and comment on every post offering an alternative perspective. I think we're just trying to get you to try and be a bit more respectful if you're capable of it. If not then that is up to you. But the whining seems to be exclusively in your court from what I can tell, it's not whining to ask for more maturity.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8228
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by 60WinTim »

Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I seem to remember Cam being just as high on Stanley Johnson in the beginning as he was on Towns. Of course that doesn't need to be said, and it wouldn't be if he wasn't being such a putz over this.


I still do like Stanley. I just wouldn't draft him where I would have early in the college season. As the season continued (because it was early), we got a clearer sense of what the draft class looks like and Stanley moved down my big board. No shame in that.

Putz? Whatever you say old man.

The same is true with Towns. He was not the consensus pick early in the college season. But solid numbers, and growth, from Towns vaulted him ahead of Okafor.

I don't get all the griping. Most people have acknowledged Cam's early support for Towns. We are happy for you. But we shouldn't have to buy a ticket from Cam to join him in that support.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

60WinTim wrote:
Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I seem to remember Cam being just as high on Stanley Johnson in the beginning as he was on Towns. Of course that doesn't need to be said, and it wouldn't be if he wasn't being such a putz over this.


I still do like Stanley. I just wouldn't draft him where I would have early in the college season. As the season continued (because it was early), we got a clearer sense of what the draft class looks like and Stanley moved down my big board. No shame in that.

Putz? Whatever you say old man.

The same is true with Towns. He was not the consensus pick early in the college season. But solid numbers, and growth, from Towns vaulted him ahead of Okafor.

I don't get all the griping. Most people have acknowledged Cam's early support for Towns. We are happy for you. But we shouldn't have to buy a ticket from Cam to join him in that support.


Never said you did so don't create that narrative. Also, the debates I'm referring to took place late in the season and after it over. I won't begin to act like I know your stance, but just know the Towns/Okafor thing isn't the same as me lowering Stanley on my big board because there was still a half of basketball season left to play.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8228
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by 60WinTim »

Camden wrote:
60WinTim wrote:
Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I seem to remember Cam being just as high on Stanley Johnson in the beginning as he was on Towns. Of course that doesn't need to be said, and it wouldn't be if he wasn't being such a putz over this.


I still do like Stanley. I just wouldn't draft him where I would have early in the college season. As the season continued (because it was early), we got a clearer sense of what the draft class looks like and Stanley moved down my big board. No shame in that.

Putz? Whatever you say old man.

The same is true with Towns. He was not the consensus pick early in the college season. But solid numbers, and growth, from Towns vaulted him ahead of Okafor.

I don't get all the griping. Most people have acknowledged Cam's early support for Towns. We are happy for you. But we shouldn't have to buy a ticket from Cam to join him in that support.


Never said you did so don't create that narrative. Also, the debates I'm referring to took place late in the season and after it over. I won't begin to act like I know your stance, but just know the Towns/Okafor thing isn't the same as me lowering Stanley on my big board because there was still a half of basketball season left to play.

Well, I don't know the timeline on everything. I follow zippo college basketball. Once the season is done, I look start looking at stats, analytics, youtube video and scouting reports. I knew a month ago that Flip could only come to one conclusion. Towns.
User avatar
Volans19
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Volans19 »

Camden wrote:What's the point in debating with someone if there's not a winner and a loser? Are we just taking opposite views and arguing for funzies? That's never been how I operate. I like to be right.


I frequent this forum for "funzies," a way to kill some time and discuss my favorite franchise. I enjoy reading everyone's take and I can be swayed one way or another on almost anything if they have compelling evidence to back it up. Cam, Cool, Abe, LST, Lip, doper, TRKO, Mikkeman, and everyone else have made me a smarter basketball fan by posting on this forum. It's a shame that some of you take things on the internet so personally and place such importance on your opinions on basketball and the fact that people are offended on a Wolves forum is just plain silly. It is just a sport after all.
User avatar
A Friendly Flatulence [enjin:8907904]
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by A Friendly Flatulence [enjin:8907904] »

Cam if you don't care what we think about you why do you care so much that you were high on Towns first? I like a good portion of what you post, but why do you have to be so abrasive all the time? Is it not more enjoyable to talk about basketball in an amicable environment among fellow Wolves fans (even though we have different opinions) than it is to argue for the sake of saying look at me I was right I'm right I'm right.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

Kind of disappointing seeing the mud sling. It takes two to tango for things to escalate in such a fashion, but yeah, this was not Cam's finest hour. That being said....

- Cam is by far the top poster (volume wise) on this board. It's easy to cherry-pick something he said that ended up being wrong when there are 5,000+ opinions of his to choose from. Respect.

- He's also probably the most knowledgeable about college hoops. He's obviously a hoops junkie and I've gleaned a ton of knowledge from his takes. I bet we all have.

- Yeah, he comes on strong, but has mostly taken as much heat, if not more, than he's given out. He is also an equal opportunity shit giver-outer (yeah, I just made that up). He gives as much crap to the most amicable of posters, such as LST, as to those who tend toward being disagreeable or edgy at times.

- Cam, from my vantage point, your credibility was earned a long time ago. I don't even care if you are "right" or not all the time. You shouldn't care so much either. It's kind of off putting.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Q12543 wrote:Kind of disappointing seeing the mud sling. It takes two to tango for things to escalate in such a fashion, but yeah, this was not Cam's finest hour. That being said....

- Cam is by far the top poster (volume wise) on this board. It's easy to cherry-pick something he said that ended up being wrong when there are 5,000+ opinions of his to choose from. Respect.

- He's also probably the most knowledgeable about college hoops. He's obviously a hoops junkie and I've gleaned a ton of knowledge from his takes. I bet we all have.

- Yeah, he comes on strong, but has mostly taken as much heat, if not more, than he's given out. He is also an equal opportunity shit giver-outer (yeah, I just made that up). He gives as much crap to the most amicable of posters, such as LST, as to those who tend toward being disagreeable or edgy at times.

- Cam, from my vantage point, your credibility was earned a long time ago. I don't even care if you are "right" or not all the time. You shouldn't care so much either. It's kind of off putting.

That was a really politically correct assessment.
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3296
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Case for Towns

Post by Phenom »

If you guys dont play nice, Towns wont like us and he will force his way to LA.
Post Reply