TRKO wrote:Tactical unit wrote:bleedspeed177 wrote:Tactical unit wrote:There is no case for Russell, he's a better version of C.J. Mccollum nothing to get excited over. Not enough athleticism, great in game smarts = limited upside. MN paid an above average backup PG a good sum of money though so what do I know.
Exactly!!!
Except Russell played in a better conference. Has a 6 inch higher reach and 4 inch longer wingspan. Better court vision and passer. Is younger and doesn't have injury history. He's the 10th one-and-done player with a WARP projection higher than 3.0. Of the previous nine, six developed into All-Stars. Nerlens Noel is too young to evaluate. Greg Oden was unable to live up to his potential because of injuries. The only non-injury disappointment in this group was Michael Beasley.
Looks like good company to me.
Some good statistical points and like I said he has great in game smarts. He changes gears to keep defenders off balance and has that no fear to shoot right in your face instinct. For me I watched some tape on him and worry quite a bit about how he will play against NBA competition. The athleticism is not there for me and his skill set might (not sold on that yet) be an upgrade over Rubio but that's more of a knock against Rubio isn't it.
Now Chad Ford tweeted that Russell had a max vertical of 39" which is pretty impressive and surprising. Now that hasn't shown up on tape as much as I would like. Maybe he is a underrated athlete.
Thats pretty much what the deal was with Roy too wasn't it? He tested better than what people thought he could do on the court? I'm not saying he is Roy just noting the similarity at least how I remember it. Lol