AbeVigodaLive wrote:Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Yea I am also missing the old Rubio flair that so many fell in love with. I often wonder if it can be recaptured? Is it a Ricky issue? A coaching issue? Did the league figure him out? Probably all of the above. Maybe this team should hire Mike D'Antoni.
Sure. Peterson says some dumb things. But I liked his comment about Nash. Nash is smaller than Rubio. And he wasn't the most athletic guy. But he knew how to use angles near the hoop so much better... whether to finish, or to set up others. We can all picture Nash cycling through looking for cutters... and even using the defense's attention on everybody else to employ a crafty little move for an easy layup when they're not expecting it.
That was an A+ comment from Jim Pete...completely right on. What I don't know is whether Ricky can improve in this area or not. My initial thought is no...while I think jump-shooting can be taught, I think that success around the basket is more instinctive. Just like Ricky instinctively sees passing angles that most PG's can't see, he doesn't instinctively know how to be effective around the basket. Heck, he lags way behind Barea in this particular area! Too bad, because it lowers his ceiling.
As for the Rubio "flash" comments, I thought about this during the Portland game, and posted about it later. My first reaction when he made that spectacular fast break bounce pass to Wiggins was "Wow!", but my second thought was "where has that been?". But after thinking about it, and about how effective Ricky was in that game, I concluded the absence of flash wasn't a bad thing...maybe bad from an entertainment perspective, but not from am effectiveness perspective. Ricky could not have been any more effective than he was against Portland, even though he only had one Wow play. I described his play that night as surgical rather than spectacular, and I would take it every night.