Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Duke13 »

monsterpile wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
Duke13 wrote:I agree Taj is a useful player, but not a starting caliber player on a top 10 team, and not an ideal fit to play next to Kat if you really want to maximize his talents. On a good team he's a back up center. So Tibs used 30 million on Taj and Dieng, terrible roster construction.



The Wolves have been a Top 10 team exactly 4x in 30 years.

The Wolves were the 24th best team the season prior to Gibson joining the squad. Baby steps.


It's fairly easy to make a case against Thibs job as a GM even if you give him credit for signing Gibson who was and is a good player for the Wolves while here.

Meanwhile...it looks to me like Thibs was right about Rubio after all. You can see articles and various stuff on Twitter about him not being good enough plus look at this stats. That doesn't mean Rubio sucks but he wasn't the answer here and Thibs traded him for a 1st round pick and cap space! Teague hasn't been a good signing but moving Rubio for a draft pick and being able to select another guy was actually a good move. Meanwhile the Jazz after spending two first round picks to bring in PGs probably don't have their guy AND they are still a pretty good team. Ugh

Saying Thibs as a GM was decent...that's not exactly high praise. Eh whatevs. Actually decent would be pretty good for this franchise who hasn't seen much of that from the front office in its 30 years. Hopefully we get better this next go around.


I agree, we received good value for Rubio.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by kekgeek »

Duke13 wrote:I'll sum it up in 1 sentence. Tibs used considerable resources (cap space, player trades and draft picks) to construct this roster for minimal returns. Now we have cap issues, no young assets, with no realistic way to improve. He fucked us, sorry that was two sentences.


Honestly though what could of happened to make us realistically better for the future. We could of drafted better no doubt but every organization can say that. You are taking an educated guess at a player and hoping the player turns out.

You mention Taj is overpaid and not a good fit next to Towns, but who was the better option there. Millsap we didn't have the cap space to obtain him. We could of gotten Patterson the cheaper option at the time what a lot of this board wanted, but he has been terrible and Taj has been so much better than him. Was it Gorgui he was coming off his best year as a pro did you want him to be the starting PF and not spend the money at all for Taj. Now lets go to Teauge, now I agree he has been up and down but he is still a middle of the pack starting PG in todays game. Now is he overpaid probably but who did you want to fill that spot. You agree that Rubio trade was a good one. So who did you want our PG to be, we could of went for Collison who has been good for Indiana and is cheaper but that goes back to the Taj vs Patterson thing not all cheaper options are going to work out well, the Collison vs Teague one probably did but once again that is using hindsight and it doesn't mean that Collison would of fit as nice with the Wolves as the Pacers.

Now lets go to Wiggins, of course the Wiggins contract sucks but 99 out of 100 GMs would have done that same thing as Thibs, you don't not obtain the 5th youngest scorer to X amount of point in NBA history. Now it sucks Wiggins has regressed and it is a killer to our franchise but no GM was going to let him just walk for nothing. Not taking a shot here but Lip said that Thibs mistake was not trading Wiggins when his value was the highest, 1st off think that is pretty unrealistic to ask a GM to do with such a young player in Wiggins but shouldn't Thibs get credit for getting rid of Lavine when his value was at his highest. Lavine couldn't obtain an All NBA guy right now.

You mentioned, that we had young assets, and cap space and Thibs fucked it up. Well that cap space would of been gone because Lavine and Wiggins were up for an extension and Towns was hitting his now. So we would even be in the Lux tax more than we currently are. Once again it sucks that the players didn't live up to their potential but is that really on Thibs fault or the players. I mean its not like Lavine has lit it up under his other 2 NBA head coaches with the Bulls.

Is Dannie Angie a bad GM then if Kyrie walks in the offseason. They had all that cap space and all those picks but if Kyrie walks, they have a core going forward of Hayward, Tatum and Brown. Hayward is the Wiggins of this situation, Tatum is the Kat (Kat is better of course) and Brown is sort of the Lavine he has regressed this year but still a good young player but is he still as valuable making 20 million a year. They have Smart who is like the Taj, they Rozier who is a RFA like Tyus who knows how much they are actually worth on the open market. They have Horford but he is getting older and can opt out. So with all those assets Boston, cap space and picks they could be stuck with a terrible cap situation and not as good of a star talent as Kat. So does Dannie Angie suck now. I don't think so he just got unlucky with the Kyrie situation ala the Butler situation.

Thibs wasn't perfect, no doubt, he drafted bad, got unlucky with the Patton injuries (who knows if he would have ever turned out good) and things could of all been different if he would of selected Collins over Patton in hindsight. But once again Thibs put us in a situation to be a damn good team. We were the 3 seed before butler got hurt and went into the last day of the regular season with a chance to be a 4 seed.

Thibs was not perfect no doubt but I just think sometimes you get unlucky, and there isn't this magical path to championship basketball. We needed Wiggins to develop and he didn't so at the end of the day Wiggins killed us. Now that doesn't mean Thibs gets no blame but sometimes it is what it is and we didn't get lucky. But that doesn't mean that Thibs plan was stupid it just didn't work out because of a ton of factors involved. There was not a single path I could see that would of made us a contender for years to come that would have been realistic.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Duke13 »

Lol. I don't think I've ever seen a worse comparison is my life. Not trying to be passive aggressive, comparing Ainge and the Celtics situation to the Tibs and the Wolves is insane. Very player you compared in your fantasy world is heavily in the favor of the Celtics and Ainge, you've made this comparison before and it's completely insane. Even if Kyrie leaves this offseason the Celtics have been conference final contenders prior to acquiring him and the two years with him, and most likely will be even if he leaves. Ainge acquired Kyrie for less then Butler, and Kyrie is younger and better then Butler. Comparing Smart to Taj makes no sense. Every GM in the would take Smart over Taj, Rosier over Tyus. Please stop with this comparison. Smh. Not one GM in the league would trade Heyward for Wig, I mean the guy has a career threatening injury, has struggled a bit coming back and still has more value then Wig. And not every GM would of signed Wig, that's just not true.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Monster »

I'll say this about Thibs and Layden. They screwed up signing Dieng to that contract and Wiggins deal is going to hold the team back BUT generally speaking they have not signed anyone else for long contracts. They mostly signed guys for short term deals with a bit more money. Teague was the longest free agent deal they gave out during their tenure and it was 3 years with a player option. They did keep some flexibility in mind. Even the Butler deal they got back guys in Saric and Covington that cost what like 15 million combined next year and those guys are going to be starting for this team? Not bad.

What I'm saying is a good GM is really only about 2 off seasons from being able to do pretty much anything they want to. A good GM would find a way to move on from Wiggins and another year from now Dieng is an expiring deal. It couldhabe been much worse.
User avatar
BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520] »

Camden0916 wrote:
BizarroJerry wrote:Remember just a few years ago when we had the best young talent in the league?


Well, there's a decent argument that we did considering Towns is in a league of his own, but the other young pieces around him were greatly overrated by fans and the rest of the league. Wiggins, Dunn, Jones, Dieng, and Muhammad are okay-to-replacement level, at best. Then there's LaVine who had already shown and proven an elite skill in the league -- perimeter shooting -- and he was shipped away.

To recap, we had one generational talent, a budding offensive star, a disappointing No. 1 overall pick, and a handful of "meh" guys who had yet to show just how "meh" or "ugh" they really were.


But it was still top 3 for sure. And i keep going back to the Dunn pick. You liked Murray. I liked Buddy. Had we grabbed either of those two we wouldn't have traded Butler, well probably not. And passing on the Wiggins max, we'd be in such great shape now.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Duke13 »

Well how many more bad contacts can you possibly hand out in 2.5 years besides Dieng and Wig???

I mean there is a salary cap.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Monster »

Duke13 wrote:Well how many more bad contacts can you possibly hand out in 2.5 years besides Dieng and Wig???

I mean there is a salary cap.


Well...the Blazers signed more guys to bad contracts in just 2016. Lol
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Do the Clippers have more talent than us?

Post by Duke13 »

That's true, the Blazers spent poorly that year.
Post Reply