Wiggins extension

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by TheFuture »

lipoli390 wrote:He's going to get the 5-year max. Thibs has made that clear. I think that's the right decision unless you're ready right now to trade him. I'm not there.

But an interesting question for all of you is this: Who or what combination of assets would you be willing to trade Wiggins for right now within the realm of what's realistic? I'd trade him straight up for the Greek Freak, but that's not realistic, so that's an acceptable answer to this question. Paul George was probably a realistic possibility, but I'm really glad we didn't trade Wiggins for a likely 1-year rental like PG. Honestly, I can't think of a realistic trade I'd be willing to do at this point. OK, have at it!


KAT doesn't get the Greek freak. He is likely the most untouchable player in the league..

I'd trade Wiggins for LaVine, Dunn, and Our choice Back at #7...
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16263
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by Lipoli390 »

TheFuture wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:He's going to get the 5-year max. Thibs has made that clear. I think that's the right decision unless you're ready right now to trade him. I'm not there.

But an interesting question for all of you is this: Who or what combination of assets would you be willing to trade Wiggins for right now within the realm of what's realistic? I'd trade him straight up for the Greek Freak, but that's not realistic, so that's an acceptable answer to this question. Paul George was probably a realistic possibility, but I'm really glad we didn't trade Wiggins for a likely 1-year rental like PG. Honestly, I can't think of a realistic trade I'd be willing to do at this point. OK, have at it!


KAT doesn't get the Greek freak. He is likely the most untouchable player in the league..

I'd trade Wiggins for LaVine, Dunn, and Our choice Back at #7...


I thought about that scenario. I might do it if we used that pick to take Dennis Smith Jr.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by Monster »

TheFuture wrote:You don't reward someone before they've proven themselves to work without. That is my biggest gripe with an early signing. Like I posted before, KAT deserves an extension immediately. Wiggins does not. There is no benefit to signing him this season. None at all. If he flops this year, then maybe we get him for a lighter deal over 4 seasons. If he develops more, then we still keep him at a lower cost than signing him now. This isn't a bad move, but it still isn't the right move.


Basically all the coming off the rookie scale max deals you are paying for what the guy is gonna do not what he has already done. That's reality. The idea that Wiggins is just gonna flop is honestly a bit ridiculous. Injury? Well anyone could get injured during any contract. Lock the guy up for 5 years and see what happens. Its really a no-brainer Wiggins will be on one of the longest contracts in the entire league and that's a good thing. I have seen ZERO evidence that Wiggins doesn't put in the work if Thibs is looking to lock this guy up long term that probably means something about what Wiggins is doing to get better.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by Monster »

lipoli390 wrote:He's going to get the 5-year max. Thibs has made that clear. I think that's the right decision unless you're ready right now to trade him. I'm not there.

But an interesting question for all of you is this: Who or what combination of assets would you be willing to trade Wiggins for right now within the realm of what's realistic? I'd trade him straight up for the Greek Freak, but that's not realistic, so that's an acceptable answer to this question. Paul George was probably a realistic possibility, but I'm really glad we didn't trade Wiggins for a likely 1-year rental like PG. Honestly, I can't think of a realistic trade I'd be willing to do at this point. OK, have at it!


Lets look at it another way. Lets say Wiggins was on another team and he was available. What kind of assets would you be willing to give up to get him here?

Honestly I think the only deals that would bring back players for Wiggins would bring back role players and while thats nice and all you end up with a situation like what happened when OKC dealt Harden. They stuck with and added role players. It wasn't enough.

LST talked about the Harden deal earlier in this thread. His post makes me think he seems to forget that Harden hadn't exactly arrived at that point. There was still questions about how good he was really going to be. Personally I thought he was going to be a star player right away the first year in Houston but I had been pretty high on him even his freshman year in college when I thought he was actually a better prospect than supposed uber stud OJ Mayo. Some people thought he was just going to be an all-star level player not the star and MVP type player he turned out to be. You can argue right now that Wiggins has proven more than Harden had although Harden showed some impressive skills at the same age. In a couple years Wiggins when LST theorizes Wiggins could be dealt its possible he will have even more value than Harden did for OKC when they did that deal and Wiggins will have 3 years let on his deal which will be pretty big since he will not be a rental. I think Wiggins is gonna make whoever is writing the checks have no problem paying up to keep him around even if it means the Lux tax. Taylor wasn't interested in paying up for old farts at the end of their primes or fringe starter types etc etc. Heck he might even be wiling to pay up to keep Teague around if this team is really rolling. Glen has been willing ot pay money when players are actually worth paying for. Lets see what happens for like 2-40 games or something before wringing our hands about what will happen 2 years from now. There is plenty to enjoy and question about on the court before we get to that.
User avatar
MikkeMan
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by MikkeMan »

monsterpile wrote:
LST talked about the Harden deal earlier in this thread. His post makes me think he seems to forget that Harden hadn't exactly arrived at that point. There was still questions about how good he was really going to be. Personally I thought he was going to be a star player right away the first year in Houston but I had been pretty high on him even his freshman year in college when I thought he was actually a better prospect than supposed uber stud OJ Mayo. Some people thought he was just going to be an all-star level player not the star and MVP type player he turned out to be. You can argue right now that Wiggins has proven more than Harden had although Harden showed some impressive skills at the same age. In a couple years Wiggins when LST theorizes Wiggins could be dealt its possible he will have even more value than Harden did for OKC when they did that deal and Wiggins will have 3 years let on his deal which will be pretty big since he will not be a rental. I think Wiggins is gonna make whoever is writing the checks have no problem paying up to keep him around even if it means the Lux tax. Taylor wasn't interested in paying up for old farts at the end of their primes or fringe starter types etc etc. Heck he might even be wiling to pay up to keep Teague around if this team is really rolling. Glen has been willing ot pay money when players are actually worth paying for. Lets see what happens for like 2-40 games or something before wringing our hands about what will happen 2 years from now. There is plenty to enjoy and question about on the court before we get to that.


Big difference in first seasons between Harden and Wiggins has been how much they had improved. Harden advanced stats jumped dramatically between each year. For example his PER went from 14.0 to 16.4 and 21.1 in third season. Win shares from 4.5 to 7.1 and 9.3, BPM from 1.0 to 4.5 and VORP from 1.3 to 3.2. Wiggins has had PER 13.9, 16.5 and 16.5 and win shares 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2 in his three first seasons and in BPM and VORP there hasn't basically been any improvement (BPM: -2.1, -2.3 and -2.7 and VORP: -0.2, -0.1 and -0.6)

So giving Wiggins a huge contract based on expected improvement in future look like much bigger risk than giving similar contract to Harden based on future expectations was since Wiggins has shown much less improvement than Harden had shown at same point of their careers.

Still giving 5 year max contract to Wiggins might be the correct move. At least I feel much more comfortable to give that to Wiggins now when Wolves won't need to give 4 year max contract to Lavine at same time.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

longstrangetrip wrote:
SameOldNudityDrew wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:Wiggins and KAT are the decade long building blocks. They aren't going anywhere if you can keep them. Butler/Wiggins/Towns are the building blocks for the duration of Butler's next deal. Everyone else is expendable and can be replaced. You don't trade Wiggins so you can keep Teague. You can't complain that this offseason was full of short-sighted moves and then argue we should trade Wiggins at any point. He's 22. He's still 4 years away from hitting his prime. I just don't get the Wiggins attitude on most of this board. He's the premier iron man in the league behind Lebron at this point and he's already a good scorer at 22 in a league run by older, more experienced players. What's he gonna look like when he becomes that older more experienced player? A virtually unstoppable offensive force? He's really good for a 22 year old. Sorry he's not Durant or other top 3 players when they were 22, but his floor right now is a damn good #2 option which fits perfectly with Towns who is setup to be a #1 option.

Wait, did I write this? :d


Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen Khansy and Cool together at the same time? Hmm...

I also believe Butler/Wig/KAT are the building blocks of this franchise, and that Thibs won't want to trade him in the future. But does anyone think OkC wanted to trade Harden...of course not, they had to. And there is a scenario out there where Thibs might have to trade Wig. PG is a vitally important position in this league, and if Tyus doesn't convince Thibs that he can be given the reins, I think Thibs will be forced to keep Teague for 2019-20 (one of the reasons I still think Thibs blundered in making the Rubio deal...Ricky seems like the kind of guy who might have taken to home town discount in order to win a championship). We'll be over the cap, so there's no chance of picking up a good free agent PG, so I think in that situation Thibs would keep Teague over Wig. But I don't see this as the tragedy some here do, because I think Wig would be very marketable and would bring back some excellent lower-priced talent (and draft picks) to pair with KAT, Butler and Teague.


In case you were interested in what the guys at fivethirtyeight think Wiggins is worth:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/carmelo/andrew-wiggins/

These are just projections, in part based on Wiggins' past performance, and in part based on factors outside of his control. So they are not perfect, but they are usually fairly accurate on these. One example where they were somewhat wrong: last year they predicted a pretty nice step up for a certain former #1 pick, but that didn't happen. They're predicting another, somewhat smaller, step for that player next year, in part because the history of #1 picks suggests he's likely to improve. That player is Andrew Wiggins.

I get that Wiggins can score a lot of points. I get that he's crazy athletic. I get that he's young. I get that his perceived value in the league right now is way higher than how fivethirtyeight values him and that's what matters when it comes to his possible tradeability. For now.

But the advanced numbers are hard to ignore, and as analytics continues taking over the league, Wiggins' value is going to drop unless he makes huge steps toward becoming a more versatile, impactful player soon.

Right now, the numbers guys like fivethirtyeight see that he is not a net positive contributor on the floor. His total plus/minus has been a negative all three years he's been in the league. He's young, and part of that is a reflection of the team, but the trajectory for him in this area is not pretty. They don't project a positive plus/minus from him until 2020. And his WARP actually decreased to .1 games last year. In addition to the concerns about his hustle and competitiveness, to the worries about his defense, to the rumblings about his lack of production in anything other than scoring, these stats from number nerds are another bit of evidence that make me skeptical about Wiggins, as much as I really WANT him to pan out. He's a fun player to watch, and he's already such a great scorer at a young age. I'm really hoping the move to the 2 and playing alongside more vets will help him a lot.

His value is still high. He could have gotten us Paul George this offseason. He probably would have been enough to get Butler straight up. But when he's making 25 million, when he's a year older and we can't rely as much on his youth to keep people believing in his potential, unless he's made a big improvement, all of this evidence is going to make a 5 year contract look less like a tradeable asset and more like a liability and his trade value is going to go down. I'm not saying we shouldn't pay him what the market thinks. But I am saying that I would really expect to see some serious improvement from him this year to justify that money or I would start keeping an eye out about possible trades while we can still get something very good in return.


Reports are it's going to be closer to $30 million.


Holy balls, 30 million! Is that even possible on a second contract? That's 30% of our entire payroll right now! That sounds like supermax money, or at least what perpetual All-Stars get. Man, I'm regretting we didn't flip him for Paul George and go all in to win right now with KAT as the reliable cornerstone of the future.
User avatar
MikkeMan
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by MikkeMan »

longstrangetrip wrote: I also believe Butler/Wig/KAT are the building blocks of this franchise, and that Thibs won't want to trade him in the future. But does anyone think OkC wanted to trade Harden...of course not, they had to. And there is a scenario out there where Thibs might have to trade Wig. PG is a vitally important position in this league, and if Tyus doesn't convince Thibs that he can be given the reins, I think Thibs will be forced to keep Teague for 2019-20 (one of the reasons I still think Thibs blundered in making the Rubio deal...Ricky seems like the kind of guy who might have taken to home town discount in order to win a championship). We'll be over the cap, so there's no chance of picking up a good free agent PG, so I think in that situation Thibs would keep Teague over Wig. But I don't see this as the tragedy some here do, because I think Wig would be very marketable and would bring back some excellent lower-priced talent (and draft picks) to pair with KAT, Butler and Teague.


I think there is still another option. If our team is really good at point when we should give max contract to Butler and KAT's new contract starts, maybe Teague wants to opt out from final year of his current contract and he signs new one with clearly lower amount per year but more years added.
User avatar
MikkeMan
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by MikkeMan »

SameOldNudityDrew wrote:
Holy balls, 30 million! Is that even possible on a second contract? That's 30% of our entire payroll right now! That sounds like supermax money, or at least what perpetual All-Stars get. Man, I'm regretting we didn't flip him for Paul George and go all in to win right now with KAT as the reliable cornerstone of the future.


No it is just normal 25% max with maximum annual 8% raise. It starts from 25.5 million and the final year of contract will be 33.7 million. I picked those numbers from Hoopsrumors:

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2017/03/projecting-maximum-salary-contracts-for-201718.htmlHoopsrumors link
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

Mikkeman wrote:
SameOldNudityDrew wrote:
Holy balls, 30 million! Is that even possible on a second contract? That's 30% of our entire payroll right now! That sounds like supermax money, or at least what perpetual All-Stars get. Man, I'm regretting we didn't flip him for Paul George and go all in to win right now with KAT as the reliable cornerstone of the future.


No it is just normal 25% max with maximum annual 8% raise. It starts from 25.5 million and the final year of contract will be 33.7 million. I picked those numbers from Hoopsrumors:

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2017/03/projecting-maximum-salary-contracts-for-201718.htmlHoopsrumors link


Still, that's a boatload of money for Wiggins. He'll be making basically as much as Kevin Durant, since Durant took the regular max not the supermax he could have, right? That's 10 million more than Klay Thompson is getting paid. Is the max for a guy on his second contract the same as guys on their third? I thought older guys could get paid more.

I'm not comfortable giving Wiggins that much money. Butler and KAT, absolutely. But Wiggins, no. He'd really better step up big time this year or I'll start pushing the "trade Wiggins" train by hand if I have to! I really hope I'm wrong, but I'm seriously afraid he's not going to be worth 25% of any team's payroll.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wiggins extension

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

Mikkeman wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
LST talked about the Harden deal earlier in this thread. His post makes me think he seems to forget that Harden hadn't exactly arrived at that point. There was still questions about how good he was really going to be. Personally I thought he was going to be a star player right away the first year in Houston but I had been pretty high on him even his freshman year in college when I thought he was actually a better prospect than supposed uber stud OJ Mayo. Some people thought he was just going to be an all-star level player not the star and MVP type player he turned out to be. You can argue right now that Wiggins has proven more than Harden had although Harden showed some impressive skills at the same age. In a couple years Wiggins when LST theorizes Wiggins could be dealt its possible he will have even more value than Harden did for OKC when they did that deal and Wiggins will have 3 years let on his deal which will be pretty big since he will not be a rental. I think Wiggins is gonna make whoever is writing the checks have no problem paying up to keep him around even if it means the Lux tax. Taylor wasn't interested in paying up for old farts at the end of their primes or fringe starter types etc etc. Heck he might even be wiling to pay up to keep Teague around if this team is really rolling. Glen has been willing ot pay money when players are actually worth paying for. Lets see what happens for like 2-40 games or something before wringing our hands about what will happen 2 years from now. There is plenty to enjoy and question about on the court before we get to that.


Big difference in first seasons between Harden and Wiggins has been how much they had improved. Harden advanced stats jumped dramatically between each year. For example his PER went from 14.0 to 16.4 and 21.1 in third season. Win shares from 4.5 to 7.1 and 9.3, BPM from 1.0 to 4.5 and VORP from 1.3 to 3.2. Wiggins has had PER 13.9, 16.5 and 16.5 and win shares 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2 in his three first seasons and in BPM and VORP there hasn't basically been any improvement (BPM: -2.1, -2.3 and -2.7 and VORP: -0.2, -0.1 and -0.6)

So giving Wiggins a huge contract based on expected improvement in future look like much bigger risk than giving similar contract to Harden based on future expectations was since Wiggins has shown much less improvement than Harden had shown at same point of their careers.

Still giving 5 year max contract to Wiggins might be the correct move. At least I feel much more comfortable to give that to Wiggins now when Wolves won't need to give 4 year max contract to Lavine at same time.


Don't get me wrong...I'm not opposed to the Wolves extension. But Monster, Wig is nowhere near the player Harden was after each of their third seasons, and it was tremendously controversial in OkC when they had to trade him. Look at their comparative stats after their 3rd years:

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1_select=Andrew+Wiggins&y1=2017&player_id1=wiggian01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=James+Harden&player_id2_select=James+Harden&y2=2012&player_id2=hardeja01&idx=players

Wig has the higher usage number and thus is the more prolific scorer, but Harden's stats are far superior to Wig's in every other category. Just take a look at offensive and defensive ratings, win shares, PER and TS%. Wig is a great scorer after his third season, but he's not even in the same conversation as Harden as a complete basketball player. I support his max contract more on potential than past performance.
Post Reply