AbeVigodaLive wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:longstrangetrip wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Q12543 wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:Q12543 wrote:Wigs starts missing free throws at exactly the wrong time. Sigh.
Ya. He's tired he is on 25 consecutive game minutes
Wow, yeah, he and Tyus have had no break.
I think alot of our 4th q mishaps the last couple of years can be attributed to thibs' mismanagement of minutes.
35 minutes are doable, but thibs consistently puts guys out there for 15+ minute stretches.
I'm with you, c-c...I'm not willing to give thibs a break on this one, even with 3 players out. Yes, the bench was terrible last night, but I put that on Thibs too...his calling card as a coach has always been to ride his starters too much, and to have his bench underperform because he doesnt trust them or use them. Other coaches coach and develop their entire rosters, and as a result their reserves are ready to step up when called on.
Does anyone really think Terry Rozier would be as successful if he was coached by Thibs instead of Stevens? I never saw Rozier as a future pro when I watched him at Louisville, and he certainly would be languishing on Thibs' bench if he had drafted him. But Stevens drafts and develops him, and Rozier steps up when Irving gets hurt. Meanwhile, a guy like Bayless gets 23 minutes on a 52 win team last year, but can only get 5 on a night when 2 PGs are out hurt? I know the Thibs apologists will point out how ineffective Bayless was last night, but they have their cause and effect wrong...Bayless didn't get five minutes last night because he is a bad player, he got five minutes last night because Thibs doesn't trust him and preferred to run Tyus into the ground. Like he always does.
Playing 3 starters 43, 40 and 37 minutes while Boston plays nobody more than 32 minutes is a prescription for disaster both for the 4th quarter and the season. Many of us questioned why Thibs played Rose and RoCo 40 minutes coming back from injuries and, sure enough, now they are both out with injuries. I've held back this year on criticizing Thib's absurdly out-of-step rotations, but the last couple weeks have really pissed me off. This guy needs to go...today.
You are making up a false narrative this year. We have no player in the top 20 in minutes. Cov comes in 24th.
He was in a no win situation. We lose last night no matter what we did. Every single bench guy was trash. Kat was trash in the 1st half allowing a huge hole to dig out of in the 2nd half.
We weren't winning yesterday
The boy who cried THIBS!
Blaming Thibs for a horrible loss... when you missed the last three quarters is more than a bit over-the-top. The Celtics shot 59% for chrissakes. They were up by 18 points at halftime.
Bayless couldn't even execute calling a random timeout just beyond halfcourt without getting the ball stolen. James Nunnally came in for 3 minutes. In that time... a broken-down Gordon Hayward drove by him twice for easy buckets... not just for a layup. But he ended up ahead of Nunnally by several steps. It was alarming how bad the guy was defensively. I can't recall seeing another Wolves player beaten THAT badly... and obviously, that's saying something. The 3rd time Hayward got the ball vs. Nunnally, he drove by him again but passed out for a wide open three pointer.
Nunnally was unplayable. Literally... unplayable. But hey... Thibby Thibs Thibs THIBS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please point out where I blamed Thibs for last night's loss, Abe. I literally just finished typing the opposite right before I read your post!
Perhaps I didn't make my narrative clear and that's on me, but let's keep the discussion on topic. To summarize:
1) The Wolves were likely to lose last night regardless of Thibs' coaching.
2) That said, if that is true why does he continue to run his players into the ground...both in games where we are clearly going to lose as well as games where we are up 20 with 3 minutes to go?
3) I think Thibs' benches are generally awful because of his coaching, not because they are terrible players. I will continue to think this until someone gives me a rational supportable reason for why players like Aldrich, Tolliver and Bayless can play 20+ minutes on winning teams, and then not be able to get off the bench when they come here. Is it any wonder that they completely suck when Thibs finally has to play them out of desperation?
Those are the points I'm trying to make, and I apologize that I wasn't clear...haven't had enough coffee yet. Let's limit the discussion to my main question...do Thibs-coached reserves generally underperform compared to prior performance (Rose being the only meaningful exception I can think of) because they suddenly become bad basketball players, or do they underperform because Thibs both doesn't trust them and doesn't know how to coach them? I think you know what my position is.