Camden wrote:JasonIsDaMan wrote:Q12543 wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Butler questionable tonight.
Og also sitting for no apparent reason.
Maybe masai is making a last minute move.
Butler/Leonard is a nightmarish wing pairing for opposing teams and they can switch everything. I'm surprised there hasn't been more buzz around Toronto.
LOVE IT!!!
JB/JP/TJ/KBD to TOR for DG/NP/DW/PS/3 1sts/3 swaps/7 Seconds (assuming TOR is 21-30 this year, if not, then 5 2nds)
I know this more me being nitpicky and argumentative than anything else, but it's hard to take some of your posts seriously -- mainly because of your incessant need to include unrealistic pick swaps and ridiculous amount of second-round picks flying everywhere. Find me one deal in basketball history where a team traded seven second-round picks, or even five.
Here's how I got to this. See if you can follow. If you can't, go ahead and print it out to reread later.
HOU offered 4 1sts. That's called an offer. You then ask for more, which is called a counter-offer. Is a three 1st's/ three swap REALLY that much different than the BKN/BOS trade? Also in every trade I have mentioned, JB is clearly the best player, so why wouldn't MIN get something back? And why aren't you going the people who think 4 1st is "not enough" for a guy WHO IS GOING TO LEEEEEEEEEAVE!?!?!
I have a job-slash-life, so I'm not going to go through all these threads, but if I did, are you ABSOLUTELY sure I couldn't find some of your that I find "hard to take seriously"? Weren't you one the guys who thought Aaron Aflalo was the next Bernard King? Or on the strength 3 good playoff games against second teamers that Bismarck Biyombo was the new Ben Wallace?
Don't like the 2nd rounders? Fine, not a dealbreaker. But if HOU is wlling to part iwth four first rounders, and that STILL NOT ENOUGH for some, then why wouldn't I suggest more?
And while I'm busy researching, find me a deal with FOUR firsts, FROM ANY SPORT! Leaf, Gretzky, A-Rod, wherever.