Based on ---
The NBA had 55 players earning at least $10 million annually two seasons ago. The total this season: 107. With all this big money, who has been worth it? We made six rounds of cuts based on performance and value, using 2016-17 numbers as of April 1. End result: the one player that's hands-down delivering the most bang for his buck. Think you know who it is?
Ricky Rubio made it to top 15.
Article below: (click link to see)
http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/19055821/narrowing-nba-10-million-club-find-best-bargain
Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
-
bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
-
bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
SO NOBODY GIVES A SHIT? WE HAVE ONE OF THE 15 BEST CONTRACTS IN THE NBA!
-
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
bleedspeed177 wrote:SO NOBODY GIVES A SHIT? WE HAVE ONE OF THE 15 BEST CONTRACTS IN THE NBA!
Who really does give a shit about contract value? Great. Our hugely rich owner is properly or underpaying one of his millionaire players. Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
khans2k5 wrote:Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
What else is there?
-
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
TheSP wrote:khans2k5 wrote:Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
What else is there?
Draft coverage. Closing out the season strong. Playing arm chair GM. There's plenty. Good contract on a bad team. Who cares?
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
khans2k5 wrote:TheSP wrote:khans2k5 wrote:Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
What else is there?
Draft coverage. Closing out the season strong. Playing arm chair GM. There's plenty. Good contract on a bad team. Who cares?
Maybe that's my problem, I don't at the moment.
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
Isn't Towns the best bang for the buck right now?
-
TeamRicky [enjin:6648771]
- Posts: 2736
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
thedoper wrote:Isn't Towns the best bang for the buck right now?
Of course but the article isn't looking at players on rookie deals, just those making 10 million plus.
-
bleedspeed
- Posts: 8173
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
khans2k5 wrote:
Who really does give a shit about contract value? Great. Our hugely rich owner is properly or underpaying one of his millionaire players. Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
When I see comments like this I think someone needs a hug. :-)
Re: Best Bang for Buck Players - Hint we have a top 15
bleedspeed177 wrote:khans2k5 wrote:
Who really does give a shit about contract value? Great. Our hugely rich owner is properly or underpaying one of his millionaire players. Why should the common fan care that we have a top 15 contract on a team missing the playoffs yet again?
When I see comments like this I think someone needs a hug. :-)
I'm imagining Bleed as Buddy from the movie Elf and Kahns as the Raccoon he tries to give a hug when they cross paths.