lipoli390 wrote:monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:Q12543 wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:A guy from espn reporting wolves and Clippers after tony allen
Yeah....certainly would help with the defensive culture aspect of things and I'm pretty sure he can still defend the hell out of people in fairly limited minutes. But unlike Thabo, who is at least mediocre from beyond the arc, Allen is a total nonfactor. Not ideal of course, but we're looking between couch cushions at this point.....
The more I think about Thibs' moves after the Butler deal the angrier I get. We'd have about $15 million in cap room if we hadn't signed Butler. Guys like Patterson, Teo and CJ Miles have signed for round $6-7 million. Ilyasova will likely sign for something in that range if not lower. I also wish we had draft John Collins who I think can contribute rebounding and efficient scoring in close as a rookie off the bench. But here we are, hoping that the 35-year old, injury-prone Tony Allen will sign with us for the vet minimum rather than the Clippers. Taj had better be very, very good these next two seasons.
Let's remember that you are basically talking about bench players and there is no guarantee that you would have gotten 3 guys with that money. Let's let this play out more.
Yes, Miles, Patterson and Teo would probably be bench players, but that's exactly what we need. No guaranteed we would have gotten all three, but we know we would have gotten at least one, CJ Miles, for around $7.5 million per year because we had a deal worked out with him, but the Pacers declined to agree to a deal. Given that Patterson signed for less than $6.5 million per year, it would seem likely we could have gotten him for $7.5 million per year. That would be the $15 million we'd have if we hadn't signed Taj ($14 million to Taj and the $1 million remaining cap space we currently have). If we hadn't done the Ricky/Teague swap we'd have the $5 million per year cap space to match Utah's offer to Thabo. It seems reasonable to assume that Thabo would have come here for the same money over Utah given that we have a much better chance of winning. Or maybe the $5 million would have been enough for Teo or Ilyasova. And we still could have signed Crawford to the room exception. I'd feel a lot better with that kind of depth -- Patterson, Miles, Thabo and Crawford, then what we have now - Taj and Crawford. Going into next season with absolutly no two-way wings off the bench is a prescription for disaster.
Wolfson reported in his last podcast that the deal for miles was more than he got in Toronto. That makes sense because basically Toronto was up against the Lux tax and likely said that's all they were willing to do. The Wolves if they made that deal could have offered more and it would have been fair. We don't know if Thabo would have signed for that money or if he would have demanded more. If we hadN't spent spent 14 million on Gibson we likely would have gotten 2 players for that price but which players would they be and how much better would they be that what we end up with when the dust settles? We don't know a lot of information so we can't just assume we could have gotten guys for certain money because that's what they got elsewhere. It's all the information we have but it's not absolute info either if you get what ai mean.
There's no way any of us can know for certain who would have signed here and for what amount. But we can draw reasonable inferences based on what the Wolves have to offer as well as what players signed for elsewhere. So I think it's reasonable to assume that we could have used the roughly $15.7 million in cap space we would have had absent the Taj deal to sign CJ Miles and at least one of the following: Teodosic, Patterson, Ilyasova, Thabo or Afflalo. And I think (my opinion) that we'd be much better off with CJ and one of those five than we are with just Taj. I also think we'd be much better off with John Collins rather than Justin Patton because, injury aside, I think Collins could help this season with his rebounding off the bench. Again, I don't think any of Thibs' moves fall into the boneheaded category like so many moves of past Wolves executives. But I still disagree with his post-Butler moves.
Fair enough.
I'll add this tweet I just saw.
https://twitter.com/MikePradaSBN/status/885524599332589568
"As a general rule: the contracts that cost you aren't slight overpays for good players, it's slight (or more) overpays for so-so players."
I'd say we have avoided doing that for the most part although you could probably put Aldrich in that category. I think we can agree Taj regardless of fit is a pretty good player although you will argue we did more than a slight overpay. I'm glad we have avoided being locked into some "so-so"players for longer than a couple years.