Camden wrote:The *only* Rubio-to-Milwaukee deal that I would have done was...
MIN: R. Rubio = $12.7M
MIL: O.J. Mayo, G. Antetokounmpo = $9.95M
I think either Rubio for Giannis or Middleton are fair exchanges in isolation. The problem I have though is who the hell was going to play PG for us!?
This is yet another reason we need to go find a solid backup. Whether we keep Ricky or trade him eventually for equivalent value to help the roster elsewhere, we need someone that can run the damn team!
I guess the idea would be to run out LaVine/Miller/Jones for the rest of this season and address the PG position in the off-season. Or maybe we got MCW back in the trade and let him start games the rest of the year and delegate him to bench PG for the following year.
Yuck on the PG-by-committee, but OK, it's a throwaway year....again. What's the plan in the offseason? Another trade? A free agent signing? Who would we target?
Camden wrote:The *only* Rubio-to-Milwaukee deal that I would have done was...
MIN: R. Rubio = $12.7M
MIL: O.J. Mayo, G. Antetokounmpo = $9.95M
I think either Rubio for Giannis or Middleton are fair exchanges in isolation. The problem I have though is who the hell was going to play PG for us!?
This is yet another reason we need to go find a solid backup. Whether we keep Ricky or trade him eventually for equivalent value to help the roster elsewhere, we need someone that can run the damn team!
I guess the idea would be to run out LaVine/Miller/Jones for the rest of this season and address the PG position in the off-season. Or maybe we got MCW back in the trade and let him start games the rest of the year and delegate him to bench PG for the following year.
Yuck on the PG-by-committee, but OK, it's a throwaway year....again. What's the plan in the offseason? Another trade? A free agent signing? Who would we target?
As long as the new point guard has a jump shot, this team will be on easy street. Watch out Golden State.
Camden wrote:The *only* Rubio-to-Milwaukee deal that I would have done was...
MIN: R. Rubio = $12.7M
MIL: O.J. Mayo, G. Antetokounmpo = $9.95M
I think either Rubio for Giannis or Middleton are fair exchanges in isolation. The problem I have though is who the hell was going to play PG for us!?
This is yet another reason we need to go find a solid backup. Whether we keep Ricky or trade him eventually for equivalent value to help the roster elsewhere, we need someone that can run the damn team!
I guess the idea would be to run out LaVine/Miller/Jones for the rest of this season and address the PG position in the off-season. Or maybe we got MCW back in the trade and let him start games the rest of the year and delegate him to bench PG for the following year.
Yuck on the PG-by-committee, but OK, it's a throwaway year....again. What's the plan in the offseason? Another trade? A free agent signing? Who would we target?
Sticking with the hypothetical Rubio for Giannis trade, you still have options. We would have shed Mayo's 6M expiring. That leaves more than the max in cap space to fire away at a Conley, if we want to overpay. There's the draft where we could reach for Dunn. There's probably a handful of other young veteran PGs that you could trade for using that pick (Teague, Hill, Dragic, Bledsoe).
Look, any time you trade a good player at a position that you're already weak at, there's going to be some more moves that have to be made to cover up. All we did in that situation was trade our weakness at SF for a weakness at PG.
Camden wrote:The *only* Rubio-to-Milwaukee deal that I would have done was...
MIN: R. Rubio = $12.7M
MIL: O.J. Mayo, G. Antetokounmpo = $9.95M
I think either Rubio for Giannis or Middleton are fair exchanges in isolation. The problem I have though is who the hell was going to play PG for us!?
This is yet another reason we need to go find a solid backup. Whether we keep Ricky or trade him eventually for equivalent value to help the roster elsewhere, we need someone that can run the damn team!
I guess the idea would be to run out LaVine/Miller/Jones for the rest of this season and address the PG position in the off-season. Or maybe we got MCW back in the trade and let him start games the rest of the year and delegate him to bench PG for the following year.
Yuck on the PG-by-committee, but OK, it's a throwaway year....again. What's the plan in the offseason? Another trade? A free agent signing? Who would we target?
Sticking with the hypothetical Rubio for Giannis trade, you still have options. We would have shed Mayo's 6M expiring. That leaves more than the max in cap space to fire away at a Conley, if we want to overpay. There's the draft where we could reach for Dunn. There's probably a handful of other young veteran PGs that you could trade for using that pick (Teague, Hill, Dragic, Bledsoe).
Look, any time you trade a good player at a position that you're already weak at, there's going to be some more moves that have to be made to cover up. All we did in that situation was trade our weakness at SF for a weakness at PG.
Good points. It just feels like a wing is easier to eventually "solve" than PG, which requires a fairly specific set of skills. I also think that some folks are convinced that Wiggins is our SF of the future and LaVine is our starting SG. So why give up something valuable where you have no depth to get Middleton or Giannis if you're wings are theoretically set for the future?
The counter to that is that PG is a deeper position overall in the league and it's possible to go find an average-ish starter if you have the cap space and assets.
I like LaVine's potential as much as the next guy, but if we're being honest, that's all it is right now: potential. That's not to say that I don't believe in his future, but Giannis is already producing with ridiculous versatility and is still just one year older than LaVine I believe. Also, I don't think you can really have enough good wing players. You could potentially play three different affective combos between Wiggins, Giannis and LaVine and still give them all 30+ MPG if you needed to.
Camden wrote:The *only* Rubio-to-Milwaukee deal that I would have done was...
MIN: R. Rubio = $12.7M
MIL: O.J. Mayo, G. Antetokounmpo = $9.95M
I think either Rubio for Giannis or Middleton are fair exchanges in isolation. The problem I have though is who the hell was going to play PG for us!?
This is yet another reason we need to go find a solid backup. Whether we keep Ricky or trade him eventually for equivalent value to help the roster elsewhere, we need someone that can run the damn team!
I guess the idea would be to run out LaVine/Miller/Jones for the rest of this season and address the PG position in the off-season. Or maybe we got MCW back in the trade and let him start games the rest of the year and delegate him to bench PG for the following year.
Yuck on the PG-by-committee, but OK, it's a throwaway year....again. What's the plan in the offseason? Another trade? A free agent signing? Who would we target?
If could actually swap Rubio for Giannis and you can throw out Towns-Wiggins-Giannis and Lavine thrown in there, who cares?
Camden0916 wrote:I like LaVine's potential as much as the next guy, but if we're being honest, that's all it is right now: potential. That's not to say that I don't believe in his future, but Giannis is already producing with ridiculous versatility and is still just one year older than LaVine I believe. Also, I don't think you can really have enough good wing players. You could potentially play three different affective combos between Wiggins, Giannis and LaVine and still give them all 30+ MPG if you needed to.
It's nice to think about, but it will never happen. He is the guy the Bucks are building around. He is the only untouchable player they have (according to media reports). I think they can give us a fair trade for Rubio.
Camden0916 wrote:I like LaVine's potential as much as the next guy, but if we're being honest, that's all it is right now: potential. That's not to say that I don't believe in his future, but Giannis is already producing with ridiculous versatility and is still just one year older than LaVine I believe. Also, I don't think you can really have enough good wing players. You could potentially play three different affective combos between Wiggins, Giannis and LaVine and still give them all 30+ MPG if you needed to.
It's nice to think about, but it will never happen. He is the guy the Bucks are building around. He is the only untouchable player they have (according to media reports). I think they can give us a fair trade for Rubio.
Q and I were speaking hypothetically, but Giannis would be who I'd want from them in a Rubio trade. I like Middleton, he's a very good two-way player, but I'm not so sure I'd deal Rubio for him. I think Rubio impacts the game more than he does. Also, if they weren't wanting to include even Middleton in a trade offer, then to me they can NOT give us a fair trade for Rubio. No mas.
Camden0916 wrote:I like LaVine's potential as much as the next guy, but if we're being honest, that's all it is right now: potential. That's not to say that I don't believe in his future, but Giannis is already producing with ridiculous versatility and is still just one year older than LaVine I believe. Also, I don't think you can really have enough good wing players. You could potentially play three different affective combos between Wiggins, Giannis and LaVine and still give them all 30+ MPG if you needed to.
It's nice to think about, but it will never happen. He is the guy the Bucks are building around. He is the only untouchable player they have (according to media reports). I think they can give us a fair trade for Rubio.
Q and I were speaking hypothetically, but Giannis would be who I'd want from them in a Rubio trade. I like Middleton, he's a very good two-way player, but I'm not so sure I'd deal Rubio for him. I think Rubio impacts the game more than he does. Also, if they weren't wanting to include even Middleton in a trade offer, then to me they can NOT give us a fair trade for Rubio. No mas.
I still think they can give us a fair trade, it just may require a third team. They have good assets to move.
Camden0916 wrote:I like LaVine's potential as much as the next guy, but if we're being honest, that's all it is right now: potential. That's not to say that I don't believe in his future, but Giannis is already producing with ridiculous versatility and is still just one year older than LaVine I believe. Also, I don't think you can really have enough good wing players. You could potentially play three different affective combos between Wiggins, Giannis and LaVine and still give them all 30+ MPG if you needed to.
It's nice to think about, but it will never happen. He is the guy the Bucks are building around. He is the only untouchable player they have (according to media reports). I think they can give us a fair trade for Rubio.
Q and I were speaking hypothetically, but Giannis would be who I'd want from them in a Rubio trade. I like Middleton, he's a very good two-way player, but I'm not so sure I'd deal Rubio for him. I think Rubio impacts the game more than he does. Also, if they weren't wanting to include even Middleton in a trade offer, then to me they can NOT give us a fair trade for Rubio. No mas.
