The Playoffs

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 10633
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by thedoper »

Vince Carter found a time machine.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Monster »

@daldridgetnt: Cavs announce surgery, 4-6 month rehab for Kevin Love.
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 2199
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Phenom »

monsterpile wrote:@daldridgetnt: Cavs announce surgery, 4-6 month rehab for Kevin Love.


I hate how Love gave up on this team but quickly made peace with it since it brought Wiggins in the fold. I feel kind of sorry for Love and was intrigued to see how he performed in the playoffs. Part of me still wants to see him walk this summer.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12119
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

I think you're seeing why CJ McCollum was the guy I wanted in the draft a couple years ago.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12119
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

And he's just another example of why you don't just write off a rookie because of a bad first season.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:And he's just another example of why you don't just write off a rookie because of a bad first season.


Three nice playoff games is enough to sell you on him? Now, I'm not one to throw sample size in someone's face nor do I have a problem with McCollum, but I think it's advantageous for you to say this at this moment in time.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12119
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:And he's just another example of why you don't just write off a rookie because of a bad first season.


Three nice playoff games is enough to sell you on him? Now, I'm not one to throw sample size in someone's face nor do I have a problem with McCollum, but I think it's advantageous for you to say this at this moment in time.

At this point, would you like him on our team? I'm guessing yes.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:And he's just another example of why you don't just write off a rookie because of a bad first season.


Three nice playoff games is enough to sell you on him? Now, I'm not one to throw sample size in someone's face nor do I have a problem with McCollum, but I think it's advantageous for you to say this at this moment in time.

At this point, would you like him on our team? I'm guessing yes.


I'm good with having Muhammad + Dieng over him. McCollum isn't exactly special.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15295
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Lipoli390 »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I think you're seeing why CJ McCollum was the guy I wanted in the draft a couple years ago.


You and me both, Cool. Flip's deal makes even less sense knowing that we sold the 27th pick for cash. We still might have gotten Dieng at 27 and if not we would have been able to take Gobert.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The Playoffs

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Forget sipping the McCollum Kool-Aid, you gentleman are chugging it an intense pace! Wowza.
Post Reply